• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe Military the tactics used by both USA and the Vietcong forces in Vietnam in the 1960's

Extracts from this document...


Describe Military the tactics used by both USA and the Vietcong forces in Vietnam in the 1960's Different tactics were used by the USA and the Vietcong forces in Vietnam. The Vietcong used what they had in the jungle as there main weapon and fought a very tactical war. They used Guerrilla Warfare, ambushing US patrols and setting booby traps. They mingled with the local villagers so were very difficult to detect. On the other hand the USA fought a very hi-tech. They used B52 bombers, helicopters and napalm, a newly discovered sticky substance that can burn through skin. They killed many innocent civilians and did not stop the Vietcong guerrilla. Although at the start of the conflict both teams were using conventional pitched battles. These were what the Americans were trained at doing and what they were the best at. ...read more.


All the entrances to the tunnels were concealed either underwater or under floorboards in houses. They also used booby traps and made their own mines. They took apart unexploded bombs and used the explosives to create their own bombs against the US. In one year, American bombers could leave 20,000 tons of unexploded bombs scattered around the Vietnamese countryside. Then on the 31st January 1968, the Vietcong troops launched a massive attack on towns and cities in South Vietnam to try and defeat the Americans with a quick attack hoping the US would be surprised and not expecting the attack. The Americans were caught by surprise and half of the soldiers were on TeT holiday leave. This unfortunately did not go well for the Vietcong and they started fighting pitched, conventional, battles which they struggled in and the Americans thrived and effectively won the battle. It was known as the TeT Offensive. ...read more.


A bomber would then come in and blow the area to smithereens. The Vietcong quickly caught onto this tactic and when they thought they saw an American troop and then he would disappear they would also run away. American troops soon caught on that they were being used as bait so started to get demoralised. When the Vietcong changed their tactics at the TeT Offensive the US started to get on top again. Unfortunately, this now meant people could see the fighting happening back in the USA and they turned against the war. Although both sets of tactics were best suit to there respective armies, the Vietcong were best suited to the battlefield. The American tactics were based on hi-tech and that's really all they had which was not an advantage in the battlefield area. Consequently, the Vietcong tactics were superior fro this war and were extremely well thought out. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. How Were The Roman Army Superior In Weaponry, Armour And Tactics To The Celts?

    would be very difficult to accurately strike a Roman on a small section of his head that was not protected by the helmet. (see picture) Roman body armour (Cuirass) was built up of overlapping metal scales which meant penetration was quite difficult.

  2. To what extent was Ho Chi Minh(TM)s leadership of North Vietnam the reason why ...

    This also caused an outcry in America, where opposition soon grew as the number of killings increased. Although Ho Chi Minh was successful in leading the Vietcong against the US Army to win the Vietnam War, there are other reasons which can be suggested as the main reason why the US Army lost the war.

  1. What were the motives of the terrorists who carried out the 9/11 attacks on ...

    Known as the six day war, the Israelis attacked their Arab neighbours; Jordan, Egypt and Syria, without warning. In 1973 the Arab states hit back, attacking Israel on the day of Yom Kippur (A Jewish festival). The Americans and United Nations supported Israel, this caused the Palestinian Arabs to distrust

  2. US military History - A long telescope allows us to see how warfare evolved ...

    In between this artic hell and desert inferno lays the steppe proper, divided into a high and low steppe. It was from this area the Sythians came, followed by the Huns, the Turks and the Mongols. These people were not territorial but nomadic.

  1. To Some People, The 1960s Were The Best Of Times, To Others It Was ...

    We wouldn't have these beautiful rhythms that have evolved from sixties music. More over, we wouldn't even have such incredible vocal artists such as Leona Lewis and Beyonce as they wouldn't have been allowed to sing or have the opportunity to become such successful singers because of their colour of their skin.

  2. History Vietnam War

    I believe that source C differs from A and B because it is a first-hand report whilst A and B are political views whose aims are to persuade the public that the war is justifiable, this could mean that it was used as a piece of propaganda.

  1. To some people the 1960s were the best of times, to others it was ...

    loss of life would have been significantly less, as the classrooms were on the side of the building nearest the landslide. This was a real downside to the 1960s and even now seems such a sad thing to learn about.

  2. Evaluatethe Vietnam war and why the Americans lost.

    the Americans strategists had come up with a better strategy the Americans of winning the war wouldn?t have been so exposed and wouldn?t have had to deal with such morale and mental issues nevertheless it would have helped if they were more experienced as they could fight back more effectively

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work