• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did Haig deserve his reputation

Extracts from this document...


4th December 2009 Does Haig deserve his reputation as 'Butcher of the Somme'? Sir Douglas Haig, was the leader of the British army throughout world war one. The most famous battle being: 'The Battle of the Somme'. Sir Douglas Haig soon got a reputation for being the butcher of the Somme, however did he actually deserve this name, or was it all a misunderstanding? The battle of the Somme began at 7.30 a.m on July 1st. Its main objective was to relieve the pressure from Verdan to help assist the French army, and consequently wear down the strength of the German forces. The Battle of the Somme saw the most death, out of the whole war. In the first day, 19,000 soldiers were killed and a further 60,000 were injured. This devastated the British army and many people place the blame soundly upon Haig's shoulders. Even due to the total devastation on lives, caused on the first day, of the battle of the Somme, Haig carried on fighting it for a further 5 months! Throughout this time, Haig never once visited the frontline and could not empathise with the soldiers. Instead he spent the whole time in a county ch�teau whilst his men were being 'butchered' on the frontline. He had extremely poor tactics and even used horses in battle. He started to use cavalry as a form of attack for over the top. ...read more.


This made a lot of people wonder, is he the correct person to be in charge of the British army if people are too afraid to tell him what is really going on in the war he is meant to be leading? A final point to make about Haig, he didn't once consider a change of tactics. Even the government were getting concerned about him. Throughout all the life loss, and devastation to the British army, he never considered a different approach. In source 3 'French soil criticise the cost of the way he did without offering alternative methods.' This source proves my point, and I do believe that it can be trusted, as out of the three sources this is the only one that creates a balanced argument and is not biased in any way. Earlier in this source it also mentions that Haig did not consider his soldiers' moral. However, I also feel that Haig was not as bad as some people suggest. For example, this was the first case of French warfare in trenches. And so he had no battles to look upon for ideas, he could not see the mistakes that other wars had caused and built off those, instead he had to come up with all the methods himself. He also had no other alternatives to sending his men over the top. ...read more.


Haig was an experienced soldier and there was never as much life loss as with the French, this suggests that Haig was a better leader than the leader of the French army. Every person in Britain at the time knew of someone who had died, this could have been there granddad, son, brother or uncle. The moral in the UK was extremely low. As Haig was the leader of the British army, he was often used as a scape goat, and the people of Britain needed someone to blame for their loss. Ultimately, the British won the war. And Haig was the leader of their army, so Haig should get the credit for it. Although there was a huge amount of devastation, the war was won and objectives were met. Future wars can learn from the mistakes of Haig and for the first war fought in trenches, I feel that Haig did a good job. There are many points for and against Sir Douglas Haig being the butcher of the Somme. However as I have been to the many battle fields of Flanders and seen the devastation and number of lives for myself I feel that Haig's reputation for being the 'butcher of the Somme' is deserved. The loss of life was huge, and he didn't consider trying to reduce it. Although the British did win the war in the end, it was not due to fighting, but cutting off the Germans food supply. This means that 'over the top' 'shelling' and constant death, which Haig promoted, was not necessary. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. To what extent did the Vikings deserve this bad press? How would you characterise ...

    to 40 men each, and were suitable for travelling along rivers, as well as in the sea. (Anne Civardi and James Graham-Campbell, Viking Raiders (London:Usborne Publishing Ltd., 1993), 8-9) These two characteristics made the Vikings formidable enemies, as they were able to attack swiftly and powerfully, making it difficult to prepare defence.

  2. Does General Douglas Haig deserve to be remembered as the butcher of the Somme(TM)?

    This source is a valid interpretation as it does interpret Haig being the butcher of the Somme because he did not play a role in the battle of Somme.

  1. did 'Bloody Mary' deserve her title?

    This book spoke of horrendous events and encouraged people to emphasise and feel sorry for the victims, in addition to speaking out against Catholism, creating the popular image of Mary. Therefore, changing their status from heretics to martyrs. Few people however, had Mary's viewpoint of them being heretics and this lead to her rapidly decreasing popularity amongst citizens.

  2. WW1 - technology and trench warfare.

    For a moment it seemed as if Ypres itself might be about to fall. The German army was just a mile away from the Lille gate and the entrance to the city. It was the closest the Germans had been to Ypres since 1914.

  1. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    Adding to Custer's woes was that, with the end of the civil war, the army faced a large-scale reduction in its strength. Many officers and men were forced to leave the service, while others, including Custer, had to accept considerable downgrades in rank.

  2. Battle of the Somme

    at the time of the battle, the first before the attack and the second after the attack. As the extracts are based on Haig's views and opinions it could potentially be biased. However, every source is biased in some way.

  1. Life In The Trenches - research and evaluation of the sources

    trench foot) but this could have been a bad idea, because if water was in the trench, then the ground would not be able to absorb it, because of the duckborards, and so the water would be left there until it evaporated.

  2. What was life like in the trenches?

    The main food was now a pea-soup with a few lumps of horsemeat. Kitchen staff became more and more dependent on local vegetables and also had to use weeds such as nettles in soups and stews. Trench Foot and other diseases: Trench Foot: Trench foot is a disease which makes

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work