• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you think that Thomas Priestley's evidence to the Middlesex magistrates is totally accurate?

Extracts from this document...


Do you think that Thomas Priestley's evidence to the Middlesex magistrates is totally accurate? Thomas Priestley and Joseph Sefton were apprentices at Samuel Greg's Quarry Bank Mill. Thomas Priestly was 13 when he ran away and Joseph Sefton was 17. They were bound by an indenture - which is a legal document binding an apprentice to an owner - in exchange for food, clothing, shelter and work. In 1806 Priestly and Sefton ran away from the Mill, but were later caught - supposedly stealing apples - and were taken before the Magistrates. Priestly was interviewed by the Magistrates. However, there is an argument that Priestley's report may be inaccurate. The first reason for this is that Thomas Priestly, as aforementioned, had an indenture against him. ...read more.


He had to sign his indenture with a non specific mark, because he could not write his name. The language in the transcript from his hearing also uses quite sophisticated language. For example, Priestley is recorded as saying 'cotton manufactory' and 'consented before the magistrate.' I would suggest that the transcript is a Clerks interpretation of what Priestley said. This argument is further supported by Sefton's transcript, which uses similar language, such as 'I have consented before the magistrates at this office.' If we take this argument further, it could even be considered that maybe, very little of this is Priestley's own words. As he was illiterate, he could not check what he had been given to sign. Further evidence of inaccuracy comes from where Priestley said the money that they spent came from. ...read more.


The fact that the doctor, personally verified (through his records) that he had treated Priestley lends Priestley credibility. Furthermore, it cannot be suggested that Sefton did not run-away from the Mill to see his mother. Priestley was a thirteen year old, who had had his finger torn off by a machine (supported by Doctor Holland's records). Life at the Mill must have been hard and it is unreasonable to suggest that he would not have wanted to see his Mother. Overall, I believe that he was telling the truth about his motives to leave. However, I am certain that based on the evidence; he was lying about his Mother's Crown funding his and Sefton's trip. I also believe that he was probably exaggerating the Mills conditions. ?? ?? ?? ?? Adam Pearson-Davies ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Quarry Bank Mill

    would carry on their work at Quarry Bank Mill. The girls would be taught to sew. This meant they would have to fix the boys clothes. I think neither of the sources are very accurate in how the apprentices were treated.

  2. Why did Samuel Greg establish a cotton mill at Styal in 1784? ...

    physical health and would be returned to the workhouse if they weren't fit. If they were fit then they were bound into an indenture (contract), which basically meant that Samuel owned them and could do what he wanted with them up to the age of 18.

  1. Is Quarry Bank Mill a typical example of manufacture and production in a British ...

    They only got leftovers, and had rarely any time to eat as they were always working and the employers were very strict. The punishments at Styal were light compared to the more brutal methods used to enforce discipline at other mills, as they would strap anyone who did not please the superintendent.

  2. Why Was the Site for Quarry Bank Mill Chosen By Samuel Greg?

    point for his goods to be loaded into the carriages and then so they could be dispatched. The Bridgewater canal was built in 1761, when this was built it enabled Greg's items to be sold in America as the canal provided transport links to the deep water port in Liverpool.

  1. Do these sources, and the site at Quarry Bank Mill, fully explain what working ...

    Further on this source, Robert Hyde Greg describes and gives a reasonable reason why the windows were boarded up, "boarded, partly to prevent her escape... partially dark." This shows a reasonable reason and also shows how Greg is saying the truth.

  2. Why was the site for Quarry Bank Mill chosen by Samuel Greg?

    become available it was snapped up quickly and also was very expensive. Greg also had Manchester business contacts and wanted his mill to be to close proximity to Manchester. Greg also realises that Arkwright's patent was about to expire which led him to the site for Quarry Bank Mill.

  1. Cause of Andover workhouse scandal?

    to talk about being raped because the badge of shame also gave people the impression that they cannot be trusted and would lie a lot. All women were in danger of being raped though, this was because men and woman were split up in the workhouse and so there would

  2. Do you think Lumsdale was a successful choice for the site of these mills?

    However, later on things changed which meant the Lumsdale Valley had no advantages over, say, Cromford. The lead mines ran out in the 19th century so lead had to be sourced from elsewhere. This was difficult as transportation had to be done by packhorse while if anything was needed in

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work