• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you think that Thomas Priestley's evidence to the Middlesex magistrates is totally accurate?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do you think that Thomas Priestley's evidence to the Middlesex magistrates is totally accurate? Thomas Priestley and Joseph Sefton were apprentices at Samuel Greg's Quarry Bank Mill. Thomas Priestly was 13 when he ran away and Joseph Sefton was 17. They were bound by an indenture - which is a legal document binding an apprentice to an owner - in exchange for food, clothing, shelter and work. In 1806 Priestly and Sefton ran away from the Mill, but were later caught - supposedly stealing apples - and were taken before the Magistrates. Priestly was interviewed by the Magistrates. However, there is an argument that Priestley's report may be inaccurate. The first reason for this is that Thomas Priestly, as aforementioned, had an indenture against him. ...read more.

Middle

He had to sign his indenture with a non specific mark, because he could not write his name. The language in the transcript from his hearing also uses quite sophisticated language. For example, Priestley is recorded as saying 'cotton manufactory' and 'consented before the magistrate.' I would suggest that the transcript is a Clerks interpretation of what Priestley said. This argument is further supported by Sefton's transcript, which uses similar language, such as 'I have consented before the magistrates at this office.' If we take this argument further, it could even be considered that maybe, very little of this is Priestley's own words. As he was illiterate, he could not check what he had been given to sign. Further evidence of inaccuracy comes from where Priestley said the money that they spent came from. ...read more.

Conclusion

The fact that the doctor, personally verified (through his records) that he had treated Priestley lends Priestley credibility. Furthermore, it cannot be suggested that Sefton did not run-away from the Mill to see his mother. Priestley was a thirteen year old, who had had his finger torn off by a machine (supported by Doctor Holland's records). Life at the Mill must have been hard and it is unreasonable to suggest that he would not have wanted to see his Mother. Overall, I believe that he was telling the truth about his motives to leave. However, I am certain that based on the evidence; he was lying about his Mother's Crown funding his and Sefton's trip. I also believe that he was probably exaggerating the Mills conditions. ?? ?? ?? ?? Adam Pearson-Davies ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. How useful is visible evidence in explaining the development of power at Styal Mill ...

    Styal Mill published this leaflet in 1996 and all the information contained in it are from the archives in the Manchester Reference Library. Because the leaflet was published in 1996 I have to question the reliability of it, as the information is from archives though I will trust it and see what I can infer from it.

  2. From the evidence available, trace the development of the Jewellery Quarter in the ...

    Smith and Peppers is very unique within the Jewellery Quarter. This is because the working practices there were completely different from the rest of the Jewellery Quarter. In Smith and Peppers they produced jewellery on a much larger scale, and they produced it all in one place.

  1. Do you think Lumsdale was a successful choice for the site of these mills?

    or canal nearby would give the valley a chance to be as good, maybe better than Cromford but the steepness and narrowness of the valley just doesn't allow that to happen. The 1847 map tells us that bleaching and dyeing are among the few remaining industries, presumably because other industries e.g.

  2. Is Quarry Bank Mill a typical example of manufacture and production in a British ...

    There was a room for spinning and weaving as well. The Styal apprentices appear to have lived better than many of their disapprovals. In towns in particular many apprentices lived and worked in appalling conditions. There is a great deal of dust in taking out the coarse cotton.

  1. Why Was the Site for Quarry Bank Mill Chosen By Samuel Greg?

    The Bollin would provide Greg with enough power to turn his water wheel and power his machines, at this time water was the best form of power as he built his mill before steam power was invented. Some of his machines that required water power were the spinning frame and the spinning mule.

  2. Cause of Andover workhouse scandal?

    should not complain because they should have been happy for what they had. Both McDougal and Dodson acted wrongly and only thought about themselves, taking no consideration to the people around them, their actions contributed towards the reason why there was a Scandal at the Andover Workhouse.

  1. Why did Samuel Greg establish a cotton mill at Styal in 1784? ...

    But did Samuel Greg take these laws into account? Using source A; a questionnaire that was sent to Samuel in 1834 by the factory commissioners; when Samuel was asked about the weekly hours of under 21's he said 69hours weekly for all ages and the new law of 1834 stated

  2. Quarry Bank Mill

    John Doherty wrote in his pamphlet that Ester Price had been denied permission to go to visit her father in Liverpool during the factory shut down. His wording made her seem incredibly innocent, as if it wasn't her fault. Only Robert Hyde Greg's account mentioned the fact that there was another apprentice (Lucy Garner)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work