• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

During all the course of the French Revolution the most controversial figure was Maximilien Robespierre.

Extracts from this document...


During all the course of the French Revolution the most controversial figure was Maximilien Robespierre. He is known to most people as the symbol of the Reign of Terror, a short but horrifying period when approximately 17,000 people died in prison in terrible conditions or were executed on the simple suspicion of being a traitor. However other people think of Robespierre as of person with genuine interest in helping the abused. For some reason, Maximilien Robespierre saw it necessary at some stage during 1783 and 1784 to make his methods of promoting nationalism much more extreme and brutal. Perhaps the finger of blame (if blame must be placed) could be pointed to one of Robespierre's main influences, Rousseau. Both were humanitarians, interested in the welfare of all people as well as the French. Maybe his own purity of belief in the Republic of Virtue led him to impatience with others. But still how could such a cruel leader get the support of the people? The answer is that to most of the people that supported him at that time he appeared to be "incorruptible" leader. He set up a political patriot party called The Jacobin club. He was the leader in the Paris Commune, the Convention and the Committee of Public Safety. He declared that dictatorship was necessary after the outbreak of the revolution because of internal dissension and foreign wars. ...read more.


From my point of view Robespierre and Stalin were similar in two ways: they were both paranoid that traitors were everywhere and they both were in favor of "Justified Terror". And as I think this is not the way of ruling the country, I don't think that any of such a rulers have ever had a true support of their nations - the only reason why they stayed in power is because people were scared of being either killed or put into jail. When Robespierre came to power he introduced three types of terror: Political, Religious and Economic. Political terror was mainly about the "Law of Suspects" that I've just said about. The most significant suspects of that law were the Robespierre's closest fellow campaigners such as Danton, Marat and Hebert. The same thing happened to Marie Antoinette and 31 Girondins because they didn't agree to use terror for the good of the Revolution. The best example of the Religious terror is the case of La Vendee where more Catholics were killed than in whole France. It was the most catholic part of the France and during the "Reign of Terror" Catholics were considered as counter revolutionaries as there was a revolutionary religion "Worship of reason" which was based on revolutionary principals (liberty, equality and fraternity) and nature. The economic terror was basically about introducing the Law of General Maximum which meant putting a maximum price on food. ...read more.


He was saying that there were traitors in the Convention itself but when he was asked to name them, he refused. For me that looks like it was a peek of his paranoia. Next day the Convention voted for the arrest of Robespierre and on the 28th of July 1794 he and 22 of his closest supporters were guillotined. I think that there were reasons and a motive for the fall of Robespierre. One of the reasons is that the terror has gone out of control and the motive was his last speech at the Convention. I don't think that Robespierre was a "bloodthirsty maniac" he was too revolutionary purist that he would go to any extends to achieve the perfect Revolutionary society. Probably his extends were further that the patience of the people and that was another reason for the fall of Robespierre. As I said earlier there is no way that the leader of the country could use a "Justified terror" on his own people because I don't think you can think of any moral justification for that. In fact Robespierre never had a complete control of France; actually, his dictatorship was brief and imperfect. Many of Robespierre's enemies were guillotined. But the group that opposed him was in fear and they understood that the terror must be stopped and the only way to do that was to undermine Robespierre's power and overthrow him at last. St. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Analysis of the French Revolution

    The king was beheaded on the guillotine on January 21, 1793. The revolution gradually grew more radical-that is more open to extreme and violent change. Radical leaders came into prominence. In the Convention, they were known as the mountain because they sat on the high benches at the rear of the hall during meetings.

  2. History - USSR - The main reason for the February/March Revolution was The World ...

    Tsar Nicholas II came to power in 1894 at the age of twenty six. Nicholas, although he took his responsibilities as Tsar very seriously, knew very little about his people. He relied upon his advisors to inform him on current events instead of finding out himself. Nicholas believed in autocracy.

  1. To what extent was the storming of the Bastille the most significant event of ...

    This is best reflected by the economic situation, which was happening parallel to the political changes of the time. Due to overproduction of wine, prices had collapsed and this combined with frequent bad harvests and specifically a disastrous one in 1788, many peasants were badly affected.

  2. Find out the real cause of the French Revolution

    Poor harvests in 1787 and 1788 also caused the peasants to barely be able to feed themselves, let alone pay more taxes. This condition left many people without any job, resulting in a huge increase in unemployment and once again, caused poverty.

  1. Tsar's Russia & revolution, Hitler's rise to power revison notes.

    Steel factories and armaments factories on strike. Cossacks (loyal soldiers) went against Tsar. Tsar said he wanted to share power but 3 days later they forced him to abdicate. The Bolsheviks and Lenin A party that came out of the SLDP. They wanted to have a majority party and get as many people involved unlike the Mensheviks (minority)


    looked for but the different groups would never be able to agree on what the change should be Tsar Alexander II had recognised that the land needed reform and that serfdom had to go. The Emancipation of the Serfs 1861 and his other reforms were an attempt to reform Russia

  1. Some key points in French Revolution and why it is similar to Ancient Greece

    Thucydides wrote On Justice Power and Human Nature, this book is a memoir of the authors life as a solider of Athens during the Peloponnesian Wars. Thucydides like Napoleon was soldier fighting for the rights of people between the city-states of Athens, Sparta, and Thebes.

  2. What happened to the Romanov Family? Sourcework

    murders took place on the downstairs floor, as source A says, 'the lower storey of the building' and source C says 'in the basement'. All three sources show that the victims were shot to death, however source C uses more detail, and says that bayonets were also used.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work