• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Haig: Hero or Butcher of the Somme?

Extracts from this document...


Question Four Sir Douglas Haig was born in Edinburgh, 19th June 1861. He studied first at Brasenose College in Oxford and then in 1884 at the Royal Military Academy in Sandhurst. He passed out of Sandhurst in less than a year and he joined the 7th Queens Own Hussars. He served there as a cavalry officer for nine years. He took part in the Omdurman campaign and in the Second Boer War. In 1906, he became Director of Military Training at the war office. In 1909, he was made the Chief of Staff of the Indian army. After the end of the war, Haig served as Commander in Chief of the British Home Forces until 1921, which was when he retired. He was made an earl in 1919. In 1921, he was made Baron Haig of Bemersyde. Sir Douglas Haig died on 28 January 1928. But the real question is: was he a hero? Or a butcher? First, I am going to discover what proved him to be a possible hero. Sources A, F, H, L, M and N show he is a hero. Source A demonstrates this by using a cartoon and headline from a British newspaper on 2nd July 1916. ...read more.


shows that Haig was not who many thought he was, which was an idiot. Because he led the British army to many victories, he is in fact a good leader. Source M is a piece of writing by Philip Warner in 1991. "If the criterion of a successful general is to win wars, Haig must be judged a success ..." shows that Haig must be a good general because he made the British army win not only many battles, but also the First World War. Source N is comments on Haig by a soldier from the First World War. I think this shows that Haig was a hero because as a soldier from the time, he has a clear image of what happened. He questions what Haig had done as if it would have been bad if he didn't chose to do it; "If he hadn't sent us over the top at the Somme, what would have happened? What would have happened if the war would have gone on and on ...". I think that the soldier thought that Haig chose all the right ideas. He also thought that Haig was a good commander: "Haig looked every inch a commander. He was a very capable man ...". ...read more.


21000 British soldiers who died that day.". This is pretty obvious really as you wouldn't expect 21000 men to die on one day. Source I is an extract from War Memoirs by David Lloyd George and it was published in 1936. There are two main statements which I have found in the text to make me think that Haig could be a possible butcher. The first is "... one of the bloodiest battles ever fought ..." as it clearly shows that the battle was very bloody. The second is "... The casualties on both sides were well over a million ..." as it obviously shows there were many severely wounded or dead. Source J is statistics of casualties during the Battle of the Somme. Although the statistics are all different, I feel that Haig was claimed a butcher correctly as the number was well over half a million either side. Source K is an extract from The Western Front by Rosemary Rees, a school textbook which was written in 1995. I feel that this shows Haig as a butcher for one reason, and that reason is "... His one tactic was to attack over and over again, no matter how little was gained or how many died." I think that this shows Haig is a butcher because its almost as if he doesn't care how many people die because of him. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Was Cromwell a Hero or a Villain?

    The king was now dead. Some people were happy; some weren't. But one group in particular decided it would be right to bring their own idea across to someone who they thought were humble and not a miser. They were known as The Levellers.

  2. Does Haig deserve his title as "butcher of Somme"?

    While it could be argued that Haig could have ended the battle when he realised the full-frontal attacks were not breaking through, he did not however realise that this was the case. Source 6 on page 42 of the text book, written by Haig himself (making it completely trustworthy)

  1. Did Haig deserve his reputation

    the war which had been fought before the Battle of the Somme, was fought using cavalry in South Africa. This had been a great success and Haig wanted to experiment to see if it would have the same results in France.

  2. oliver cromell- hero or villain?

    They had served faithfully in Cromwell's army and he repaid them with death because he did not wish to share power with lower classes. Nowhere are Cromwell's actions more open to argument than in his campaign in Ireland.

  1. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    " A man respected and beloved by his followers, who would freely follow him into the 'jaws of hell'." Written by Mark Kellogg, for the 'New York Herald' correspondent. The source was used in a news paper so could have had the use of promoting places in the army for the public so would have used propaganda.

  2. The Battle of the Somme

    It was decided that there should be a joint attack between the British and French, cooperating together in a combined assault to destroy the German army once and for all. There were many positive points for this plan - the two armies together would be one, doubling the impact.

  1. Does General Douglas Haig deserve to be remembered as the butcher of the Somme(TM)?

    Haig being rewarded for his repellent activities when he did nothing, he was the murderer of all and doest deserve to be made earl. This source is reliable because it comes from a witness from the time; however I have to consider this source might be bias because it's his

  2. Haig and The Somme

    All of the commanders are full of confidence." Repeating these words shows that not everything is ok because after a day of battle, spirits and confidence would not be good. They wouldn't have high spirits because some of their friends would have died and they would be demoralised as they would be worn out.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work