• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History - Russia

Extracts from this document...


Russia Coursework - Question A a. Both sources A & B both give similar accounts of what occurred in 1918 with regards to the 'disappearance' of the Romanov family. However, technically, this does not mean that they are both reliable. The provenance of Source A causes us question its reliability. In 1918, Judge Sergeyev was recruited to investigate this case - he was a Menshevik. The Mensheviks were a group of Russians who opposed the Bolsheviks - the group of Russians who were suspected for the supposed disappearance. The information in Source A states that the information provided by the source came from the findings of Judge Sergeyev. In comparison to this, Source B's information also comes from Judge Sergeyev findings - he presented the details to Sir Charles Eliot of Britain, the British government being anti-Bolshevik at the time. As a result of this, the source of the information in both sources is the same, and also both come from anti-Bolshevik sources - they are certain to agree if they come from the viewpoint of the same person. Therefore, the source in itself may not be all that reliable; as Judge Sergeyev was a Menshevik, he could have tailored the evidence in order to portray the Bolsheviks as the perpetrators. There are numerous sources which claim a different series of events occurred to the ones provided in Sources A and B. For instance, Source C states that Sergeyev had no 'doubt about the fact that the entire Romanov family had been massacred in the Ipatiev House'. However, Sources A and B state that Sergeyev did 'not believe that all the people, the Tsar, his family, and those with them, were shot there', and 'There is no real evidence as to who or how many victims there were. ...read more.


If he admitted that he was in the room at the time of the killing, this would surely establish his guilt - and as he denied he was in the room, yet Source H states that there was an additional man whom Medvedev did not account for, this immediately leads us to believe that he was the extra man, which questions the sources reliability. However, Source D could also be fairly reliable. Source E, is an account of the murders by Medvedev's wife - with all of her information coming from Medvedev himself. Medvedev will have no doubt held his wife in high esteem, bestowing her with a large amount of trust. Consequently, she will have known the true sequence of events which happened in the Ipatiev House. Some of the information in Sources D and D agree with each other - for instance, Source D states that Medvedev saw 'all of the members of the Tsar's family lying on the floor', Source E states that the guards 'started firing, and killed them all'. The fact that both these sources agree does establish a slight amount of reliability for both of them. d. Sources F, G, and H, are all graphical sources relating to the murder of the Tsar. However, some are more reliable than the others. For instance, Source F is a photograph - it shows the exact state that the room was in, and is therefore indisputable. Source H is also a factual source - however it comes purely from the perspectives of the witnesses, and so although this may seem reliable, it may not be as reliable as first thought. ...read more.


This implies that although, we can believe some parts of Source C; others do not seem to be all that factual. In addition to this, Source J states that the lorry which contained the corpses of the royal family became ''bogged down'' in a swamp in Ekaterinburg. Source B states that at the time, ''no corpses were discovered''. This therefore validates the claim made in Source B that no corpses were located - supporting Source B and implying that it is reliable. However, it also disagrees with Source B. Source B states that 'a train left Ekaterinburg and it is believed that the surviving members of the royal family were on it'; whilst Source J deviates from this as it proves that the corpses of the Empress and three daughters were also discovered with that of the Tsar's - dental records positively identified ''Nicholas II, his wife and three of their daughters''. If accurate tests have proved that the Empress and three of the Tsar's daughters were also murdered with the Tsar, then this eliminates the possibility that some members of the royal family escaped - and so no surviving members could have left Ekaterinburg on a train on a later date, which implies that Source B may not be all that factual. In conclusion, although Source J does confirm some of the details of certain sources, it does disagree with others, and therefore it does not completely construct the period in which the Romanov's were murdered. For instance, it does not corroborate the claim made in Source B that the ''Tsar, Dr Botkin, the Empress's main'' etc were murdered in the Pieties House. As a result of this, we cannot use Source J to fully authenticate the events. ?? ?? ?? ?? Adam Denny Tuesday, 9th September 2008 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    Stalin was a very paranoid man and as a result of that launched the 'purges'. When he got into power he was worried that some of his rivals might overthrow him. Due to Stalin's paranoia the Communist Party had purged its membership getting rid of all the members who were suspected of being disloyal.

  2. Lenin's Role in History

    Lenin's main role in 1917 was to spearhead the revolution. In February 1917 the February Revolution took place, the result of an accumulation of social, political and economic problems caused by the war. In 1917 the war effort caused economic chaos and by February people in the towns of Russia were starving and freezing.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    Source F is a speech made by Bukharin in Paris in 1936. Bukharin was a backer of Stalin against Trotsky. This was because Trotsky wanted world wide Communism whereas Stalin and Bukharin wanted one country Communism. He fell into dishonour and humiliation in 1929 where he was purged an executed in the purges.

  2. Stalins' Russia Coursework

    loyal supporters into positions of influence, so people he trusted were put in charge of important sections, and made sure they couldn't take over so Stalin could maintain his power.

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Although, source J is concerned about the individual progress of the students, "the students were completely unprepared and some could barely write or do the simplest mathematics" The statements show the contrast of the two sources. Source I said, " to keep thins stinking bourgeois alive to infect students with

  2. Stalin - Source based work

    This was also the time of the second of the five-year plans. Many peasants who had not lost their land during the early introduction of collectivism had died during the famine caused by the diversion of grain from the country to the industrialised areas, and others had left the land to join the workers on the factories.

  1. Source A is a report from an American newspaper and it tells us that ...

    I think that source C is more different than similar to source A and B as it has many exaggerations and unnecessary opinions in it. Source A and b are uncertain accounts whereas source C is certain of the outcome of the family (they were killed).

  2. Study Source A : Source A must be trustworthy because it is an eyewitness ...

    All the children have lean and unhappy faces, and the two naked children have exposed ribs and very thin limbs which suggest food deprivation. The Russian production figures compiled by R Wolfson may provide a reason for this in the huge 54% decline in the production of grain in the years between 1913 and 1921.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work