• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History - USSR - The main reason for the February/March Revolution was The World War I. Do you agree?

Extracts from this document...


Revision: USSR Essay Questions The main reason for the February/March Revolution was The World War I. Do you agree? YES * The war caused serious food shortages. With millions of peasants conscripted into the army, there were not enough people to produce food. * Any food there was was unable to make it to the cities to the starving people because the railways were being used to transport troops and supplies to the front. * Food prices rose and wages stayed the same. * Millions of Russian refugees fled to the cities for shelter from the advancing German armies. This caused overcrowding and more pressure on food supplies. * Unemployment rose as factories closed down due to the shortage of manpower, coal and other raw materials. * Russia faced many military defeats as the army was ill equipped and leaders were chosen for their birth rather than their military skills. The Russian people lost hope and were increasingly disillusioned by the war. * The Tsar took control of the army, putting himself in the position of blame. The Tsar became very unpopular. * The Tsarina was left in charge of Russia but she relied heavily on Rasputin who used his influence to put his friends in high places. This made the Russian people angry. NO * Even before the war there were problems in Russia. * The Tsar was incompetent and lacked the necessary qualities needed to make a good leader. * The entire system in Russia was inefficient. The majority of the population were peasants and the minority were very wealthy. ...read more.


All written material was censored and controlled to prevent criticism. The church preached that to oppose the Tsar was a sin. The entire system in Russia was inefficient. Russia was considered to be a very backward country. This was because it still had a feudal system. The majority of the population - over 90% were poor and illiterate peasants who barely made enough money for them to live on. The land they worked on was rarely owned by them. Agriculture was also in a very bad state due to the old fashioned, inefficient tools the peasants used. Above the peasants on the feudal system were the middle class. These were educated people with careers such as doctors, lawyers and business men. They used their skills to earn money. The small minority of the population who were above the middle class were the aristocracy. They were born into their positions and did not work to earn them. The aristocracy were very wealthy and they lived comfortably on the huge estates they owned. About 1% of the population owned 25% of the land. Peasants often had uprisings and called for land, but this was never granted and they were crushed by force. In 1900, industry in Russia started to grow rapidly. Large factories were built and a whole range of industries emerged such as coal mining, iron and steel. Large numbers of peasants flocked to the towns to work in the factories. They were the industrial working class, otherwise known as the proletariats. The living conditions of the industrial working class were terrible. ...read more.


This caused disbelief and outrage in Russia. Rasputin's relationship with the royal family damaged their reputation even more. By 1914, the Tsar seemed to have everything under control. All strikes and protests were crushed by the army, the Okhrana rooted out any trouble makers and revolutionaries and the revolutionary leaders were either in prison, in exile or doing labour in Siberia. However, things were about to change with the outbreak of the First World War. In conclusion, I believe that the First World War was not the main cause of the March Revolution even though it played a big part in causing it. The March Revolution occurred mainly because of earlier events which I have explained. Russia was in a bad state way before the war started. Russia's economy, politics, agriculture and social structure were suffering and in desperate need of modernisation. There already existed food shortages, resentment towards the Tsar and dissatisfaction. The war only magnified these problems and added a few more. If there had not been so many problems in Russia before the war and Russia had been a healthy country, the war would most likely have not caused a revolution. As well as this, the war was only a short term cause of the March Revolution as sooner or later, Russia would have to have a revolution. The problems in Russia would probably have built up slowly, increasing resentment towards the Tsar and his autocratic rule, dissatisfaction at bad working conditions and unfulfilled promises as well as support for revolutionary groups until it all led to a revolution, if not for the war. The war was just the spark that lit the bomb. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    Prices rose in the cities, as the war cause shortages of food. Lack of industrial materials cause factories to close, also causing the unemployment of workers at the same time. What was even worse for the Tsar was that the Japanese inflicted defeat after defeat on the Russians.

  2. What were the causes of the february revolution

    These industries needed workers so peasants began to move to the towns and work in the factories, these peasants were know as the proletariat. More and more peasant began to move to the larger cities to fill the job vacancies, with too many workers crowded into one city, living and working conditions became appalling.

  1. "To what extent was World War One the main reason for the downfall of ...

    The Russian economy was another long-term problem contributing to the Russian revolution. Industry was a failure as there were large numbers of poor landless peasants who worked long hours with low wages living in appalling conditions. Karl Marx wrote in 'The Communist Manifesto' in 1848: "they have nothing to lose but their chains."

  2. Lenin's Role in History

    Was Lenin more significant for his actions in 1917 or for his subsequent actions from 1918 to 1924? Lenin was a Russian revolutionary and was best known for being one of the main leaders of the October Revolution in 1917 and the first head of the Russian Soviet Socialist Republic.

  1. How did living conditions change in towns as a result of the Industrial Revolution ...

    place .Aside from this , in the opinion of a particular historian by the name of M .Guizot , believed that the Revolution may have not taken place due to a minority of people's religious obsessions and who wouldn't give way to the general standard of living proposed by the

  2. What were the causes of the March 1917 Revolution?

    Management of the country was unable to cope with the continual riots, or organise the countries finances so they are prioritised to where the money is needed most. The close relations to Rasputin decreased his and the Tsarinas respect even more.

  1. Many causes could lead to a revolution. In 1917, there were two distinct Revolutions ...

    The second cause, a logical consequence of the first, was the growing conviction of the workers and peasants that their problems could be solved only by the soviets, a conviction that was decisively molded by Bolshevik propaganda following the April arrival in Petrograd of Lenin.

  2. "Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of March ...

    This greatly increased food production, a good agriculture was needed for Russia to industrialize and modernize. But these new land reforms had a "serious downside: they produced a growing class of alienated poor peasants. Many drifted into the cities to work in the factories while others became disgruntled farm laborers."3

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work