• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How and why did the tsar nicholas II survive the 1905 revolution?

Extracts from this document...


How and why did the Tsar Nicholas II Survive the 1905 Revolution? There were many various factors which contributed to Tsar Nicholas II surviving the 1905 Revolution. One could say these worked together to achieve the Tsar's survival, however perhaps the most influential of these was the loyalty of the Russian army during the period. Without the reliance he had upon the Army, it could be questioned as to whether The Tsar would have survived the revolution. The procession of workers whom marched to the Winter Palace led by Georgi Gapon where by 100 workers were killed and some 300 hundred wounded, is labelled Bloody Sunday. This was the beginning of a series of events, fighting for better wages and factory conditions which is now known as the 1905 Revolution. The Tsar was left in a state whereby his every move had to be made with utter focus and thought. The government mishandled many situations and this was one of them. The deaths and injuries were down to the police panicking and not being strong enough to defend appropriately. ...read more.


His idea was to improve in areas which were perhaps the least developed such as Siberia and improve upon their productivity. Not only this, but he was a ruthless man, which is far more than could be said for the Tsar Nicholas II. His barbarous attitude suppressed many peasant uprisings and in turn created the second Duma. This helped Russia with its numerous problems to improve their economy and the living and working conditions of the people. He even won supporters for Nicholas, and he himself couldn't. Japans victory against Russia also heightened Russia's unrest. The war was poorly conducted, the troops had little intelligence, maps were out of date, and in fact Phleve landed Russia in a state of complete embarrassment. The loss just highlighted the weakness of the country and how far behind it was in many ways. Russia lost Port Author to Japan. They lacked in common sense; not even considering the validity of their maps. Yet again, Tsar Nicholas II was blamed, as the easiest target. This furthermore weakened his position to stage where any minute he could lose his title. ...read more.


However, Even though there were all these improvements in stabilising Russia, they could still not rid the opposition of the Tsarist system. Hence, in 1903, the Tsar passed the 1903 October Manifesto under the guidance of Witte. This was the creation of a laws-making Duma. It was a Liberal approach granting the freedom of speech, no imprisonment without trial, assembly and worship, the legalising of trade unions and mortgage redemption payments for peasants cancelled. In the eyes of the Tsar, it was completely irrational and betraying autocracy. Nevertheless, it prohibited peasant uprisings and contributed a lot to the Tsar's survival. Although it does need to be mentioned that the Duma not being allowed to pass laws, still only the Tsar was suppressing change. Overall, even though there were many contributing factors towards the Tsar survival of the 1905 Revolution, none of these were down to the Tsar. He was unwilling to cooperate and unwilling to allow change. In fact, it was down to Stolypin, Witte and other key individuals to pull him through. At the same time, very importantly, even though the army were very ruthless, they stuck by him at all times as his protectors and defenders. Without them, the Tsar would have been crushed under uprisings and riots throughout Russia. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    With all the monstrous and horrific acts that Stalin was responsible for, he as also the man responsible for major economic changes in Russia. In 1928 Stalin forced some changes on agriculture and industry. In order to improve agricultural production Stalin introduced collectivisation.

  2. How secure was Nicholas II as Tsar in 1914? Nicholas II was Tsar for ...

    This meant that his position wasn't secure. Although it could be argued that because Witte died before 1914 his affects on Nicholas' position at this time was small. The Russo-Japanese war in 1904 certainly made the Tsars position volatile. The war was started by Russia itself but their military was unprepared and unable to transport supplies to soldiers.

  1. Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905, but not that of 1917?

    This was because Russia's structural problems were not solved after 1905. The only way they were dealt with was by sending the peasants back to work and away from the necks of the government "The revolution, if that's what it truly was, was a revolt driven by discontent with living-not discontent directed squarely at the government in and of itself.

  2. How did the tsar survive the 1905 revolution?

    opposition to the Tsar and everything it stood for, especially by the Union of Liberation and the national minorities. The peasants had had a great deal of respect for the Tsar. The Tsar was the leader of their church and he was a father like figure for them.

  1. How and why did the Tsarist regime survive the 1905 revolution?

    There was an alliance between the bourgeois and the working-class revolutionaries. Witte realised that this alliance needed to be broken and proposed the October Manifesto in which greater individual freedom, and a Duma, which would share power with the Tsar, was promised.

  2. Why did Nicholas II survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of 1917?

    This meant that he was protected from the revolution because he had the military power necessary to put down the striking and to protect himself from any violent rebellion among the common people. The opposition was a disorganised rabble, and there was no way that they could effectively oppose the Tsar while he had the army supporting him.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    The quote also reinforces the idea that Stalin is a person fighting within his conscience unsure of decisions he takes. He is depicted as an incalculably apprehensive and insecure about the lack of support that he is receiving. This makes him feel "unhappy" and he felt constantly threatened by other communist leaders.

  2. Tsar Nicholas II

    This made it hard to govern the country as the Tsar would be split between the different groups and if he helped one group and didn't help others, people would have hated him. It made it very difficult that they had different aims, and because of this the Tsar simply

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work