• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did the Tsar survive Politically in 1905?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How did the Tsar survive Politically in 1905? Firstly, to understand how the Tsarist regime survived in 1905, it is necessary to answer the question: what, politically and socially, happened in 1905? It is then possible to see how Nicholas II dealt with these problems and managed to survive this turbulent year. In the few years previous to 1905 there was increasing social turmoil caused by rapid industrialisation in Russia. Furthermore, there was no legal way of expressing political views as there was no parliamentary system and as a result there was a discontented and oppressed working class and a desperate and poverty stricken peasantry. The working classes, at the time, had to work in very poor conditions for very long hours and for very little pay which angered them further. Additionally, The peasants were poor because they owned no land themselves, had poor harvests and heavy taxation by the Tsar to pay for industrialisation. The middle classes were also discontent because of the absence of a political voice for the vast population. Therefore most sectors of Russian society were in strong opposition to the state. Only the gentry, the state-dependant industrialists, aristocracy and the army supported the regime out of self-interest. ...read more.

Middle

Also, post treaty, the railway network had been freed up so food and supplies were now reaching towns and cities in larger quantities. The Tsar was beginning to become more respectable once again, although the loss of the war had actually caused immeasurable damage to the Tsars, once grand, image. On October 22, 1905, thousands of industrial workers, men, women and children marched to protest peacefully to the Tsar. The march was led by a priest and a union leader called Father Gapon. They marched on towards the Tsar's palace in St. Petersburg, carrying a petition that requested from him the improvement of living conditions, and more freedom of expression. When the crowds were asked to leave, they refused and the guards fired upon the peaceful protesters, resulting in the death of hundreds, and the wounding and trampling of many thousands of people. This tragedy was called 'Bloody Sunday'. This, in turn, sparked an endless number of proletarian strikes, peasant uprisings, as well as further opposition to the Tsar and the tsarist systems he had meant to protect. The peasants respected the Tsar greatly, as the Tsar was the leader of their church and a figure for them to look up to. ...read more.

Conclusion

He had also made reforms to the October Manifesto meaning that the Dumas were filled with his own aristocratic supporters which completely defied the point of having a Duma at all as Russia's population, again, was not represented how they would have wished. Overall, how the Tsar survived politically was mainly due to his irrepressible power that he had over Russia and partially luck. Nicholas was lucky due to the fact that the parties that wanted to revolt had been unorganised and missed their opportunity windows to launch successful revolts, as well as the fact that the parties did not combine early on to combat Tsarist Russia. A crucial factor of the Tsars survival was the fact that Nicholas had his thumb on anyone with power and could use them accordingly. He had the full support of his armed forced at the time and this also quashed any resistance to the Tsar and was a deterrence to any thinking of revolt. He relied heavy on many of his right hand men to think up great schemes and solutions to his problems. These people included the likes of Sergei Witte and Peter Stolypin, whom directed the Tsar in the right direction. If it wasn't for these factors then surely Nicholas II would have been overthrown as he was entirely incapable of running the country alone. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Russia 1905-1917 exam questions with mark schemes.

    The food shortages were too much. As the Russian army were needed for troops, most of the farmers including workers and peasants were gone for battle. Because of this there weren't enough people to grow food which led to food shortages.

  2. Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905, but not that of 1917?

    Could the circumstances been any worse? Russia was now economically and socially trashed. Military status in 1915 was disastrous; it was so serious that Nicholas had to leave Petrograd to lead the army himself. The Tsar appointed himself as commander chief and became associated with military failure- what more to

  1. How and why did the Tsarist regime survive the 1905 revolution?

    men, women and children led by a priest and a union leader in the name of Father Gapon. They marched towards the Tsar's palace in St. Petersburg, carrying to peacefully present to him a petition that requested from him the improvement of living conditions, and more freedom of expression.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    It can be implemented only by tens of millions when they have learned to do it themselves". (LCW, Vol. 27, p. 135.) These statements of Lenin, which can be duplicated at will, reflected his deeprooted confidence in the ability of working people to decide their own future.

  1. How did the tsar survive the 1905 revolution?

    the abolishment of certain laws and a change in many issues revolving around the Tsar. On October 22 1905 the movement culminated in a march of thousands of industrial workers, men, women and children led by a priest and a union leader in the name of Father Gapon.

  2. Why was the Tsarist regime able to survive the revolution of 1905?

    The Russians expected a quick and easy victory but the Japanese smashed the pacific fleet at Port Arthur and a poor equipped and badly led army were heavily defeated in Mukden, an important Japanese town in March. In May the Baltic fleet tried to rescue the situation but was destroyed

  1. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    This is a subjective source and so cannot be believed fully. Source E, although it claims that Stalin was a man, if it is examined in depth, we can discover that there are many sinister truths to it and so it actually depicts Stalin as a monster.

  2. 'THE TSARIST REGIME WAS SECURE BY 1905'

    It is not surprising therefore that Russia did not launch a full-scale drive to industrialise until the 1890's. Ivan Vyshnegradsky attempted to drive Russia forward by increasing its exports and imports. This initially had the desired effect however it put a lot of pressure on the peasantry and in 1891-2

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work