• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did the Tsar survive Politically in 1905?

Extracts from this document...


How did the Tsar survive Politically in 1905? Firstly, to understand how the Tsarist regime survived in 1905, it is necessary to answer the question: what, politically and socially, happened in 1905? It is then possible to see how Nicholas II dealt with these problems and managed to survive this turbulent year. In the few years previous to 1905 there was increasing social turmoil caused by rapid industrialisation in Russia. Furthermore, there was no legal way of expressing political views as there was no parliamentary system and as a result there was a discontented and oppressed working class and a desperate and poverty stricken peasantry. The working classes, at the time, had to work in very poor conditions for very long hours and for very little pay which angered them further. Additionally, The peasants were poor because they owned no land themselves, had poor harvests and heavy taxation by the Tsar to pay for industrialisation. The middle classes were also discontent because of the absence of a political voice for the vast population. Therefore most sectors of Russian society were in strong opposition to the state. Only the gentry, the state-dependant industrialists, aristocracy and the army supported the regime out of self-interest. ...read more.


Also, post treaty, the railway network had been freed up so food and supplies were now reaching towns and cities in larger quantities. The Tsar was beginning to become more respectable once again, although the loss of the war had actually caused immeasurable damage to the Tsars, once grand, image. On October 22, 1905, thousands of industrial workers, men, women and children marched to protest peacefully to the Tsar. The march was led by a priest and a union leader called Father Gapon. They marched on towards the Tsar's palace in St. Petersburg, carrying a petition that requested from him the improvement of living conditions, and more freedom of expression. When the crowds were asked to leave, they refused and the guards fired upon the peaceful protesters, resulting in the death of hundreds, and the wounding and trampling of many thousands of people. This tragedy was called 'Bloody Sunday'. This, in turn, sparked an endless number of proletarian strikes, peasant uprisings, as well as further opposition to the Tsar and the tsarist systems he had meant to protect. The peasants respected the Tsar greatly, as the Tsar was the leader of their church and a figure for them to look up to. ...read more.


He had also made reforms to the October Manifesto meaning that the Dumas were filled with his own aristocratic supporters which completely defied the point of having a Duma at all as Russia's population, again, was not represented how they would have wished. Overall, how the Tsar survived politically was mainly due to his irrepressible power that he had over Russia and partially luck. Nicholas was lucky due to the fact that the parties that wanted to revolt had been unorganised and missed their opportunity windows to launch successful revolts, as well as the fact that the parties did not combine early on to combat Tsarist Russia. A crucial factor of the Tsars survival was the fact that Nicholas had his thumb on anyone with power and could use them accordingly. He had the full support of his armed forced at the time and this also quashed any resistance to the Tsar and was a deterrence to any thinking of revolt. He relied heavy on many of his right hand men to think up great schemes and solutions to his problems. These people included the likes of Sergei Witte and Peter Stolypin, whom directed the Tsar in the right direction. If it wasn't for these factors then surely Nicholas II would have been overthrown as he was entirely incapable of running the country alone. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How and why was Nicholas able to survive the 1905 revolution?

    Although Russia did not officially start the war with Japan, Nicholas saw it as an opportunity to regain his control over the country by rallying the nation together through a successful war. Leading into 1905, this was Nicholas's plan for preventing the unrest within Russia mounting to anything beyond normal.


    The Social Revolutionary party also agreed with the peasants and wanted them to start a Revolution. This I believe this didn't secure the regime entirely as peasants, and middle class were very unhappy with the Tsarist system and thus they could pose a threat to the regime as the population

  1. Russia 1905-1917 exam questions with mark schemes.

    He became very close to the Tsar and the Tsarina because he seemed to be the only one who was able to heal the Tsar's son, Alexis, who had a blood disease called haemophilia. Soon Rasputin became the most influential person in the tsarina's entourage.

  2. How Did The Tsar Survive The 1905 Revolution?

    This would be realised by many of the people and would once again produce unrest in the system 11 years later in 1917. The greatest reason that the tsar stayed in power, in my opinion, was probably most likely the failings of the opposition.

  1. How did the tsar survive the 1905 revolution?

    They marched towards the Tsar's palace in St. Petersburg, carrying to peacefully present to him a petition that requested from him the improvement of living conditions, freedom of speech. The crowds where then asked to leave to leave, they wanted to stay and make sure their demands where heard and

  2. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    This means that the source is probably true because he does not include his own opinion and so the source is objective. Source G depicts Stalin as a man and not a monster because it gives reasons for why Stalin committed some of the atrocities that he did.

  1. Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905, but not that of 1917?

    All the different revolutionary groups' frustration and keenness of rebellion was recognized between one another, but it was not united. It is stressed that the key constituent to this revolution was the instability of economical progress such as peasants losing their land and having bad working conditions; not the political regime.

  2. How and why did the Tsarist regime survive the 1905 revolution?

    Their main priority was the redistribution of land to the peasants. The last party opposing the Tsarist regime was the Liberals, whose main aim was to try to create a liberal democratic government, which could match Russia's newly emerging society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work