• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How fair were the Paris Peace Treaties

Extracts from this document...


How fair were the Paris Peace treaties? At the end of the war in 1919 representatives from 32 countries met in Paris to write a peace treaty against the defeated nations of the First World War. All the representatives from each country had sat and discussed the terms of the treaties known as the Paris Peace Treaties. Although, after the treaty was created there were many problems saying that were the Paris Peace treaties fair on the defeated nations. To say that the treaty was fair is a very hard thing to describe as everyone has a different perspective. To begin with, Germany would have also treated the allies harshly if they had won the war. The German finance minister had claimed that if they had won the war they would certainly make the allies pay harshly for the damages they had caused. The treaty was fair on Germany, as the Germans would have also make the Allies pay harshly if they had won the war. ...read more.


They were also not invited at the conference when making the terms. How could it be fair? The Germans had no way they could object to the terms. This was already unfair towards them. Germany had to accept everything. In Addition in Article 231 in the Treaty of Versailles Germany had to take the full blame for starting the war. However it can be said that the start of the war is a complex mixture of imperialism, militarism and rising nationalism. Accepting the entire blame for the war is wrong. Germany was forced to be paying extremely high reparations to the allies. They were supposed to be paying �6.6 billion. This was an amount that Germany would never be able to pay. The allies were trying to bankrupt them. This was a harsh decision made by the allies as the German economy had already been destroyed by the war. The Reparations had crippled them more. This was unfair on the Germans as the Allies had known about the German economic situation and still imposed high reparations. ...read more.


The Hungarian people that had moved were not welcomed and it was hard for them to feel as new citizens in different countries. This was un-fair on them as citizens had to move and had no choice. Hungary also was given big reparations that they would never be able to pay. In Conclusion the Paris peace treaties could be said fair as the allies had won the war and they could do anything they wanted to the Germans. The Germans had joined the war voluntarily and should have known the consequences. The Germans did treaty Russia harshly in the treaty of Brest-Litovsk and would have also treaty the allies harshly if they had won the war. Although the defeated countries were not even invited to the conference to talk the terms and it had to be unfair as they had to accept all the terms given to them. Hungary had lost a lot of its population and Turkey had lost its strong military position to benefit the allies. The treaty could be said fair as the allies had won the war but they shouldn't have imposed harsh decisions. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Were the peace treaties of 1919 - 1923 fair?

    4 star(s)

    Alsace and Lorraine were rightly returned to France, the land did justly belong to France. The Treaty of Versailles demilitarised the Rhineland for German soldiers, to protect France it was agreed that the Rhineland should be occupied by Allied troops for a period of 15 years.

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    By October of that year, Hitler called off the operation, realizing that the British could not be defeated. Following Hitler's failure in the Battle of Britain, Hitler moved on to conquer the Soviet Union in order to gain power on their oil, minerals, and wheat fields.

  1. Summary of John Maynard Keynes' "The Economic Consequences of the Peace".

    Russia which always exports food may starve, Hungary pillaged by Romania. Coal can be imported/exported but the breakdown of the prevents the process along with the breakdown of the European currency system prevents another option which is the manufacturing of the goods.

  2. Were the treaties of 1919 - 1923 fair

    The "Big Three" (pictured below) that represented the Treaty were Prime Minister David Lloyd George of the United Kingdom, Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau of France and President Woodrow Wilson of the United States of America. The Prime Minister of Italy, Vittorio Orlando, played a small part in the plans.

  1. Treaty of Versailles, was it fair?

    and loosing it. That is something they had to accept. I also think that their talk about their great territory loss of 13% (including 10% of her population, 14% of her farmland and 75% of her iron ore resources) was their way to say something against the treaty and not

  2. What was the impact of the other 4 Paris Peace Treaties?

    Treaty of Neuilly The treaty of Neuilly, dealing with Bulgaria was signed on 27 November 1919. Bulgaria's army was limited to 20,000 men, four torpedo boats and no air force. It lost land to Yugoslavia, Romania and Greece, but gained land from Turkey.

  1. were the paris peace settlements fair

    to sign a deal called the Anschluss which forbade them to join forces with Germany. The land lost by Austria was given to; Poland who took control of Galicia, Bohemia and Moravia went to Czechoslovakia, Dalmatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina was given to Yugoslavia.

  2. Woodrow Wilson's Views and the Peace Treaty.

    He believed every country should have enough force to defend herself, but not be able to attack others. Wilson definitely did not want the Germans to resent the allies for taking too much of their powers away too, he believed that it was mostly the Kaiser?s wrong doing and the German people should not be punished in consequence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work