• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union

Extracts from this document...


`How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union I will explain who was most important in creating the Soviet Union, Stalin or Lenin? Political Lenin promised his people 'free elections' to the new constitute assembly. However, the Bolsheviks were overpowered by the peasant-based Socialist Revolutionaries, something that Lenin feared. Lenin proved his political power, by sending the red army to shut it down. This showed his people that he would do anything to stay in power, and it shows then how much control he had and that he would take down any opposition that way in his way of doing so. This was important in creating the Soviet Union because it meant that the USSR was kept under strict dictatorship and that the government depended largely on its people to obey its orders, to lead the revolution. Stalin wanted people to be afraid of him, so they would not go against him or disobey him, he had to do this by scaring his people, and this would lead the Russian people to think the same way Stalin did and agree with every word in fear of their own lives. Stalin put this fear into place by introducing 'Purges,' anyone who opposed him would be killed. He had ordered secretly for many Bolsheviks to be killed, and Trotsky, Bukharin, Zinoviev and Kamenev were some of which were murdered. ...read more.


Lenin was determined to make a communist country. 'In the villages the peasant will not give grain to the Bolsheviks because he hates them... People are arrested daily and kept in prison for months without trial' This was said a British businessman, this is unlikely to be reliable as it would be hard for him to create any profit with what was happening, also the Britain and Russia didn't like each other very much so the British business man could have had bad views on the country to start of with. War Communism helped Lenin create the Soviet Union as he needed to win the War so helping the Bolsheviks got Russia to win the War. However, things changed after the war and the new economic policy was introduced. They were brought out of communism and were able to make a profit. This was important because this when people started to trust Lenin again and helped him to go on to create the Soviet Union. Lenin dressed like a typical worker, by doing this Lenin was becoming one of them and he gained the trust of the workers, Lenin was almost brainwashing them to support him by acting like he was inspirational and acted like an ordinary man. This could be seen in the times after Lenin died in 1924, 'He is not one of the gentlefolk, he is one of us,' this shows how clever Lenin was, and how he had thought about getting people on his side. ...read more.


To Conclude I think even though Lenin did influence the society in a big way, Stalin was still more important socially in creating the Soviet Union; this is because Stalin took supreme control in making sure everything was monitored in order to praise him. This was important as he needs the support of the public for his regime to continue, making sure that all the Russian people could think of was how 'great' Stalin was ensured this, and made them believe that everything Stalin did was for them. Stalin changed the Russian society, even though millions of people were dying, all the praise that was towards Stalin influenced the people to only think positively of him and think that the purges were nothing to do with him. It was important in the creation of the Soviet Union as it helped him gain control and do as he pleased to have made the Soviet Union as strong as it is. Conclusion 'Stalin's excesses were tempered by his foresight.' Overall, I think that Stalin was much more important than Lenin because of the decisions he made and how he came about them. I think the quote above proves why Stalin was more important in creating the Soviet Union, he was prepared to make decisions based on the future and how that would affect the country, while Lenin only thought about how his policies would affect the industry in the current time. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How Successful Were Stalin's Policies During His Leadership of the Soviet Union?

    The formation of NATO in 1949 and the stationing of American troops in Western Europe was a reaction to Stalin's policies and helped ensure the development of the Cold War.

  2. Purges and Hysteria in the Soviet Union

    Supervision of literature had begun, and Stalin himself intervened in the studies of philosophy and history. Ideological battle erupted in the Comintern. Lenin's approval of Communists working with reformers was reversed. Communist parties outside the Soviet Union pulled their membership out of reformist unions and other organisations and began organising

  1. Consider this judgement on the consequences of Stalin's leadership of the Soviet Union 1928 ...

    For instance, the British revolution took place over a century to reach a reasonable standard - the Russians had done this, twice if war devastation and subsequent resurrection is counted, in 1/5 of the time. Superiority of communism over capitalism was being asserted through advancements in nuclear technology and leading the 'space race'.

  2. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    Stalin wanted a great increase in industrial production. To do this it was essential for Stalin to supply food to his workforce. Also he wanted to sell grain abroad in order to earn foreign currency to buy modern machinery. Stalin didn't want to be in a position that the peasants could threaten Russia's food supply.

  1. Was terror the main reason why Stalin kept power in the Soviet Union?

    For example, if the League of Nations stepped in Stalin could say he was giving fair trials and would not let them inspect the country. The show trials were also important because many people confessed to the supposed crimes in a hope to get a shorter sentence.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    and ended up 'purging' the Communist Party, leaving only members that he believed were loyal and that he was not threatened by. In 1934 Stalin had Kirov murdered and then purged Zinoviev and Kamenev which resulted in them being arrested and later that year shot to death.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    Concluding the credibility of Source F the fact it was published in Paris, is significant as France was a capitalist country that opposed communism, and thus was against Stalin and his communist policies. One can say the source is biased however, it is much more reliable then source E for a number of reason.

  2. How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union?

    As such it demonstrates that Lenin was fundamentally important in the Bolshevik party taking control of Russia. I think that the letter sent by letter is an unbiased source because it can be traced back to its original date and it also correlates with the Trotsky statement.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work