• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union

Extracts from this document...


`How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union I will explain who was most important in creating the Soviet Union, Stalin or Lenin? Political Lenin promised his people 'free elections' to the new constitute assembly. However, the Bolsheviks were overpowered by the peasant-based Socialist Revolutionaries, something that Lenin feared. Lenin proved his political power, by sending the red army to shut it down. This showed his people that he would do anything to stay in power, and it shows then how much control he had and that he would take down any opposition that way in his way of doing so. This was important in creating the Soviet Union because it meant that the USSR was kept under strict dictatorship and that the government depended largely on its people to obey its orders, to lead the revolution. Stalin wanted people to be afraid of him, so they would not go against him or disobey him, he had to do this by scaring his people, and this would lead the Russian people to think the same way Stalin did and agree with every word in fear of their own lives. Stalin put this fear into place by introducing 'Purges,' anyone who opposed him would be killed. He had ordered secretly for many Bolsheviks to be killed, and Trotsky, Bukharin, Zinoviev and Kamenev were some of which were murdered. ...read more.


Lenin was determined to make a communist country. 'In the villages the peasant will not give grain to the Bolsheviks because he hates them... People are arrested daily and kept in prison for months without trial' This was said a British businessman, this is unlikely to be reliable as it would be hard for him to create any profit with what was happening, also the Britain and Russia didn't like each other very much so the British business man could have had bad views on the country to start of with. War Communism helped Lenin create the Soviet Union as he needed to win the War so helping the Bolsheviks got Russia to win the War. However, things changed after the war and the new economic policy was introduced. They were brought out of communism and were able to make a profit. This was important because this when people started to trust Lenin again and helped him to go on to create the Soviet Union. Lenin dressed like a typical worker, by doing this Lenin was becoming one of them and he gained the trust of the workers, Lenin was almost brainwashing them to support him by acting like he was inspirational and acted like an ordinary man. This could be seen in the times after Lenin died in 1924, 'He is not one of the gentlefolk, he is one of us,' this shows how clever Lenin was, and how he had thought about getting people on his side. ...read more.


To Conclude I think even though Lenin did influence the society in a big way, Stalin was still more important socially in creating the Soviet Union; this is because Stalin took supreme control in making sure everything was monitored in order to praise him. This was important as he needs the support of the public for his regime to continue, making sure that all the Russian people could think of was how 'great' Stalin was ensured this, and made them believe that everything Stalin did was for them. Stalin changed the Russian society, even though millions of people were dying, all the praise that was towards Stalin influenced the people to only think positively of him and think that the purges were nothing to do with him. It was important in the creation of the Soviet Union as it helped him gain control and do as he pleased to have made the Soviet Union as strong as it is. Conclusion 'Stalin's excesses were tempered by his foresight.' Overall, I think that Stalin was much more important than Lenin because of the decisions he made and how he came about them. I think the quote above proves why Stalin was more important in creating the Soviet Union, he was prepared to make decisions based on the future and how that would affect the country, while Lenin only thought about how his policies would affect the industry in the current time. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How Successful Were Stalin's Policies During His Leadership of the Soviet Union?

    In the post-war period it could be argued that Stalin mismanaged his country's relations with its former allies and that his policies united Europe and America in a solid anti-Soviet bloc. Stalin again feared the threat of an invasion from the west and therefore between 1945 and 1948 he created

  2. Stalin and Lenin

    parties and revolution so they wanted to eliminate any opposition and wanted to impose a dictatorship. A difference is that Lenin was prepared to change his policies whenever the country needed it the most, for example he introduced the "The New Economic Plan" in March 1921 to enable Russia to

  1. How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union?

    Stalin had a much different approach towards territory within the USSR. Following the second 'great' war of the 20th century, The USSR, under Stalin, greatly expanded. The creation of Comniform enabled Stalin to co-ordinate communist parties that could also keep an eye upon them.

  2. `How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union

    After gaining power, Stalin was determined to modernize the USSR; he ended Lenin's NEP, and introduced his 5 year plans, which set targets for each industry, region, factory, and even individual worker, despite most targets not being met, they were extremely successful, in some cases production rose 300% from 1928

  1. How important was Lenin compared to Stalin in creating the Soviet Union?

    The reality of this method can be shown in the following photograph taken in 1921. This photograph shows the extent of the 1921 famine, this meant the Russian people who had been promised "bread" by Lenin, were not actually receiving it.

  2. Stalin man or monster

    This may mean that the two assessments that Khrushchev made are untrustworthy and are mainly for him to gain popularity amongst people. However, I prefer to think it was a combination of both of these factors. Nevertheless, the sources do reflect eras in Stalin's legacy and fit the description of

  1. How did Stalin win Leadership of the Soviet Union

    As Stalin also had the power of patronage this enabled him to place certain people in key positions within the party, therefore gaining their support and thus having the influence to oppose any policies he did not agree with, and pass any policies he felt beneficial to his cause.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    However, he doesn't specifically say that it is his fault, or that it is not his fault, he only says what Stalin considered right. Source H is much more extreme, as it directly attacks Stalin.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work