• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

`How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

`How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union In this essay, I will investigate who was most important in creating the Soviet Union, Stalin or Lenin? The first factor to consider is the Economic policy. Lenin introduced the system of war communism with two main aims, to put communist theories into place (i.e. redistribution of wealth), and to win the civil war. War communism achieved its aim of winning the war, but in doing so caused terrible hardships for the Russian people, some estimate that 7 million people starved to death under it. This had huge implications on the country, people refused to work, there was public uprising. Russia's agrarian economy was dependent on crops, and War Communism had stifled it, production fell to levels not seen since the beginning of the 20th century. Lenin soon abandoned War Communism in favour of what he called "New Economic Policy", he recognized that he would have to abandon his purely communist principles, speaking at the Party Congress, 1921 he said "we must try and satisfy the demands of the peasants who are dissatisfied... there must be a certain amount of freedom to trade, freedom for the small private owner". ...read more.

Middle

One of Lenin's first moves after taking power was to negotiate Russia's withdrawal from the war. The Brest-Litovsk Treaty did this, but on highly embarrassing terms (e.g. Russia lost ~90% of its coal mines), Lenin gambled on Germany losing so that he could reclaim the land, a shrewd political manoeuvre and one that paid off, but remember it was in fact Trotsky who negotiated the treaty. Lenin also showed his political strength in early 1918, elections had been held, and when the Constituent Assembly opened, the Socialist Revolutionaries were the biggest party, so Lenin promptly sent I the Red Army to shut it down, this move showed people that he and he alone was firmly in control, without this kind of control, the USSR would have crumbled. Stalin was very intelligent, he took on many boring, but important political offices within the party so that he could place his supporters into important positions, and transfer opponents to less important posts where they could do little harm. He took on his opponents one by one. He once took Bukharin's side in an argument to get rid of Trotsky, then argued the same points Trotsky had to get rid of Bukharin. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Kronstadt sailors stated in their official statement that they 'hoped for freedom' and that 'the result has been greater slavery', they wanted to 'free the workers and the Soviets from the Communists'. This meant that Lenin had to abandon the policy of War Communism and put in place a new economic policy. On the other hand, War Communism was extremely crucial in creating the Soviet Union. Had Lenin, not led the country into winning the war, he would have kept the policies of 'War Communism' and many more people and supporters would have died (turning a lot of people against him). Also, there would have been a possibility that Russia would have been taken over by other Countries, as 'War Communism' led the people to be venerable (as many of them were starving). Also, without War Communism and a lot of people dead because of it, Lenin would not have thought about creating a new economic policy (which caused many people to believe that Lenin betrayed the communist belief) that would benefit his people. Furthermore, the Kronstadt would have made 'a third revolution' and freed the 'Soviets from the Communists'. Without War Communism, Lenin would not have saved his peoples' belief in him. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How Successful Were Stalin's Policies During His Leadership of the Soviet Union?

    However, in the short-term collectivisation constituted a major setback to the Russian economy. Much of the agricultural infrastructure was destroyed, farms were disrupted and equipment destroyed. The volume of Soviet livestock also fell dramatically which meant less availability in materials such as leather and wool, and consequently a decline in the production of consumer goods.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    Because of the five-year plans, many new industrial options were open to Russia, allowing them to build better weapons and most importantly, tanks. The Russian tanks of World War Two proved to be quite a formidable force, especially against the German army.

  1. To what extent was Stalin's economic policy successful? In the 1920's the soviet economy ...

    Year No. of collective farms in 1,000's Sown area of Collective farms, mill. h/areas % of collective sown area serviced by MTS 1929 57.0 4.2 - 1930 85.9 38.1 27.4 1931 211.1 79.0 37.1 1932 211.1 91.5 49.3 1033 224.6 93.6 58.7 1934 233.3 98.6 63.9 1935 245.4 104.5 72.4

  2. Stalin and Lenin

    into his own plans, which was known as later to be 'Socialism in One Country' Lenin's impact on Russia and the Russian people Lenin had a great impact on Russia, he created a world power house and he is still seen by many historians as an icon.

  1. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    Source A depicts Stalin in a negative light as the caption, when translated, reads, 'Visit the pyramids of the U.S.S.R.'. The cartoon also shows piles of skulls that have been shaped into pyramids. Perched on top of the piles of skulls are several black Ravens.

  2. How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union?

    The map of Eastern Europe following World War 2 (source B) shows how much of Europe was now under the flag of the USSR. This demonstrates how determined Stalin was that the Soviet Union should expand. In fact, Stalin caused concern to both Churchill and Roosevelt at the Yalta conference, with his demands.

  1. How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union

    things like, improving the red army, then the Soviet Union would have never existed and the people would have never wanted him to be the leader. SJ Lee in 1987 said, 'Lenin... was the overall planner of the revolution' this information is likely to be trustworthy as S J Lee

  2. Stalin’s Application of Communism

    to have experienced tno difficulty in assigning priority to the current interests of the USSR. Stalin was primarily concerned with internal, Soviet issues, rather than external, world issues (Ulam 635). In 1927, Stalin stated, "a period of new revolutionary upsurge" had started, which would presumably assure the eventual realization of worldwide Communism (Stalin/Tucker 168)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work