• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How significant was Martin Luther King Jnr to the success of the Montgomery Bus Boycott?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How significant was Martin Luther King Jnr to the success of the Montgomery Bus Boycott? I do not doubt that Martin Luther King Jnr played a vital role in the success of the Montgomery bus boycott; however I do not think that he should be the only individual to be credited for its phenomenal achievement. Most crucially without King as a leader the Boycotters would have had no source of inspiration, they would have become disorganised with no one to assert authority, and therefore become less of a threat to the bus companies and officials meaning that their cause would not have been taken so seriously. Also many people would have given up more easily without, the leadership that King provided, as many felt that Non-violent protest would not be recognised or rewarded. Martin Luther King was elected by the Montgomery Improvement Association (MIA) to be their president. Which is important because the fact that other influential people like E. Dixon, Ralph Abanathy, and H. ...read more.

Middle

He received between thirty and forty hate letters every day, and his house and car were made the target of bomb attacks endangering himself and wife Corretta Scott-King. However despite all these things Martin Luther king did not begin the Boycott himself. Indeed it was Rosa Parks, a seamstress and former secretary for the NAACP, who sparked the idea for the protest after her brave refusal to give up her seat on the Cleveland Avenue bus on the evening of 5th December 1955. Moreover it is much easier to be part of a large group campaigning for a cause with the moral support of safety in numbers, whereas it is a lot more difficult and more courageous to stand up on your own when you have no one else supporting you, because Rosa could have easily become the victim of violent abuse. As well it was a joint effort by national organisations like CORE, the NAACP and individuals like E. ...read more.

Conclusion

Not only these things but King was not the only person to face violence or abuse from opposition. Reverend Robert Graetz; a white minister who served a mainly black community in his church, had his house bombed, while other members of MIA received threatening letters. On the streets the boycott had angered some white extremists, leading to blacks having eggs or other food substances thrown at them. However some whites approved of the cause and of demonstrating though non-violent protest. Therefore I believe it is fair to say that Martin Luther King Jnr played a significant role in the Montgomery Bus boycott, but that it would not have been the astonishing success that it was without the help of other individuals and organisations and the three thousand or more black and white citizens who kept the boycott up for 381 days. 1 Pg. 40 Causes and consequences of the African American Civil Rights Movement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1941-80 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1941-80 essays

  1. What role did Martin Luther Kings play in the Montgomery bus boycott?

    He had already rejected an offer to lead the local NAACP, he did, however, allow the church to be used as a meeting place and it was here, following the arrest of Rosa Parks, that the boycott was provided with a location, inspiration and some finanicial aid.

  2. Why was Martin Luther King both so bitterly criticised, and so deeply mourned by ...

    King was blamed for being a poor organizer. King and the SCLC used 'hit and run' tactics going into communities organized by others, and often leaving behind embittered, betrayed communities. However, in his defence he was a religious leader and not a politician he didn't believe in leadership the only person we should follow is God.

  1. Martin Luther King Jr.

    King to create the dawn of a new era in American history. The 1940s 50s and 60s experienced huge changes in the constitution of America, behaviour toward the black minority changed by new laws brought about by King's intervention. The change in attitude can be classified as acceptance (see model)

  2. Analysis of spoken language: Frasier

    simple things in life, so when he attempts to involve his sons, "Oh you know you can join me and the boys at McGinnis..." they're gonna dye the beard green" it creates humour because Martin flouts the maxim of relevance.

  1. Martin Luther King.

    Unity is the greatest need of the hour. And if we are united, we can get many of the things that we not only desire but which we justly deserve. And don't let anyone frighten you, because we are doing it within the law.

  2. A 'Compare and Contrast' essay, evaluating the success of both Martin Luther King's techniques ...

    I on the other hand, more often than not use imagery to exaggerate the bleakness and hostility of some situations, such as my powerful metaphor: "the walls of Capitalism", and predominant, drawn-out personification: "glows the fake plastic smile of fashion".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work