• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In this essay I am going to try and decide whether the cause of the Northern Island troubles were long term or short term.

Extracts from this document...


In this essay I am going to try and decide whether the cause of the Northern Island troubles were long term or short term. Some people believe that the troubles in Northern Ireland began hundreds of years ago - that the current conflict was started by religious differences and has continued to the present day. The other viewpoint is that the disturbance today only began when tensions started building at the time of the Civil Rights movements/marches during the 1960s. This viewpoint claims that earlier events had no bearing on the struggles of today, they were simply used to make a point of whom out of the Nationalist or the Unionists were right. View One Many people believe that the conflict really began in the 1530s when Henry VIII broke away from the Roman Catholic Church and set up his own Protestant Church in England. Although Protestantism was now the major religion in England most of the Irish people remained Catholic, so Henry declared himself King of Ireland. He tried to anglicise the Irish so they would no longer appear against the English. This could be a major religious cause as it created the two separate groups of people in the first place - making it an important factor in bringing about the difficulties. Catholics could feel like they were alienated from the start - and the fact that King Henry just declared himself king of Ireland could strengthen some Nationalist arguments. When Queen Elizabeth defeated Irish Catholic rebels in 1601 she rewarded her Protestant supporters and gave them lands taken from the rebels. This was taken further by King James I. He began a full scale 'Plantation of Ulster' in 1609. Scottish and English Protestants were encouraged to settle on land taken away from Catholics. All they had to do was to take an oath of loyalty. This pushed the Catholics out and made them resent the Protestants. ...read more.


That is the reason Louis XIV supplied former King James with troops and ships. James though he could use the fact he was Catholic to gain Irish support and get his throne back. Already the war doesn't sound at all religious. On top of this Williams 'protestant' army had several catholic regiments and was even supported by the Pope. Huge celebrations were held in Rome after Williams' victory. This could show us that perhaps it is not the history that is the problem - perhaps it is the way it is used by the modern groups looking for powerful historical symbols to justify the actions they take today. Another example of this is Wolfe Tone. The myth of Wolfe Tone goes as such: 'Dublin Lawyer, Theobald Wolfe Tone, sets up the Society of United Irishmen, inspired by the French Revolution in 1789 and campaigns to overturn the Penal Laws which are very harsh on Catholics. He fled to America to avoid arrest, but returned in 1796 to try and get support for an uprising in Ireland. The uprising began in 1978, but the rebels were defeated at the battle of Vinegar Hill in June 1978. When Wolfe Tone was captured he slit his own throat. The British then decided that it was too dangerous to allow Ireland to have it's own Parliament and it was therefore united to England by an Act of Union in 1800. Wolfe Tone soon became a symbol of resistance for all Irish Catholics.' However, this isn't the full picture. Before we even start to contradict the story, Wolfe Tone wasn't a celebrated Catholic hero until the late 19th century. Tone was also a reformer, as opposed to being a revolutionary. He saw resistance as a last resort and only fought back after his poor treatment by the British government. He wasn't even only answering to the plight of the Catholics; he also fought the harsh judgement forced on the Presbyterian Protestants. ...read more.


So, on the afternoon of August 15th 1969 the British army came onto the streets of Belfast - and they would still be there 30 years later. Conclusion With the complicated history that Ireland has it's easy to see why people's views differ as to why it all led to violence. I believe that the real violence that actually was between Nationalists and Unionists only began really in 1968 with all the civil rights marches. However, to discover the reasons for the civil rights marches you have to go back a few years to when Catholic discrimination began, and then you might go back a few more years to try and discover the reason for that. From my point of view it's just one long messy chain of events until 1969. It appears that there was always a little bit of resentment between Protestants and Catholics in Ireland (seemingly caused by either British monarchy or British politicians). Even though street history tends to make things that little bit worse, like the Protestants idolising William of Orange, or the Catholics idolising Wolfe Tone, regardless of what actually happened, I think that if there wasn't a little bit of hatred between them in the first place these stories would not have come about. I think the more important causes of the troubles in Northern Ireland were early, like when Henry VIII created Protestantism. When he tried to force this on the Irish. When King James I took land away from Irish Catholics and gave it away to British Protestants. Factors such as these triggered a separation that has lasted centuries. I believe that the separation that this caused eventually led to the partitioning of Ireland, which in turn, led to discrimination and violence in 1969. In conclusion, though the violence in 1969 seemingly was caused by the tensions in the 1960s and the civil rights marches, the tensions wouldn't have existed if it weren't for all that came before it. Which was more important in bringing about the troubles which broke out in Northern Ireland in 1969 - long or short term causes? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. What are the main differences between Republicans / Nationalists and Unionists / Loyalists?

    Another major event was the Republic's willingness to amend its constitution. It seems surprising that Nationalists and Republicans were happy with this decision, but it indicates how the government's priorities have changed and that they want to leave tension and bad feeling in the past.

  2. Northern Ireland Essay

    Their was hope for England during 1649-50 with the power of the Protestant leader Oliver Cromwell, as he began rebelling back to the Catholics and restoring English control over Northern Ireland. Any of the Catholics who had previously rebelled had their land taken away from them and give back to the Protestants once again.

  1. Northern Ireland Conflict-Religion vs. PoliticsThe conflict in Northern Ireland is likely one of the ...

    In an effort to overcome the political gridlock, the independent chairman of the multi-party talks set a deadline for agreement as the 9 April 1998. The deadline did give the process a new sense of urgency and had been a good idea.

  2. The History of Conflict in Ireland.

    So, how do you maximize the support you've got there? There are those who are there for the military, there are those who are there for the political. As soon as the British took control with direct rule in 1972, they began to work with the Irish government, because they didn't want to hang on in Northern Ireland.

  1. How Did the Catholics Grow To hate the Protestants?

    Sinn Fein agreed to the principles, but the IRA leadership said it did not, and refused to hand over any arms. When the troubles broke out in 1969 many Irish Americans became interested and involved in Irish affairs. They were generally pro - Nationalist.

  2. Conflict in Northern Ireland: A Background Essay

    In the 1918 election Sinn F�in effectively replaced the old Irish Parliamentary Party and established its own Irish parliament. The resulting War of Independence between Britain and the IRA was eventually ended by a treaty and the Government of Ireland Act in 1920.

  1. Why was the Battle of the Boyne an important event in Irish history? Why ...

    "A small minority - would use these events to be engaged in violence" The violence, greater still, distances Northern Ireland from a stable peace.

  2. With What Success Has The British Government Tried To Deal With The Irish Troubles ...

    Sinn Fein as they still refused to accept the partition of Ireland. Ian Paisley was very vocal about what he thought of it, many gathered to hear him condemn it. This links in the "terrorism triangle" with the death of Bobby Sands and Direct Rule, as these were then actions mainly focus on terrorism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work