• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

It is true that Stalin was the cause of millions of Russians being murdered and there is sufficient evidence, which shows Stalin to be a despotic tyrant, but whether he should be condemned for this is a different matter.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Adam Sivner 5V Stalin Coursework Q7 It is true that Stalin was the cause of millions of Russians being murdered and there is sufficient evidence, which shows Stalin to be a despotic tyrant, but whether he should be condemned for this is a different matter. Stalin was obsessed with power and to make sure he kept it, he would murder anyone that showed even the slightest bit of opposition to him, so millions of people died in these purges. Also Stalin got rid of some of the Soviet Union's most intelligent and creative brains for example - thinkers, writers and artists who could have gone on to great things. Instead Stalin had them murdered too, as he cold not stand people who were more intelligent or gifted than he was, as they posed a threat to him. Also there is no doubt that Stalin used the five year plans to increase his power on the country. This was done by increasing the industrial base with these new plans, this would therefore increase support for the Bolshevik party and so give Stalin the excuse to increase control over trade and so this would in turn increase his own power. ...read more.

Middle

Source H on the other hand is most likely to be reliable as it was written many years after the purges in a time where Britain was no longer at war with Russia. This source taken from a textbook, meaning that the information will have been taken from many different sources, shows how Stalin forced through collectivisation, killing many of the Kulaks in the process. One can see that there is plenty evidence against Stalin showing him to be a mass murderer and a despotic tyrant but he did do many good things for Russia. In just 30 years Stalin managed to turn Russia into a powerful, modern industrial nation. In 1928 Russia was very much industrially backward but by the mid 1940's agriculture was organised by collectivisation and she was far more advanced industrially than she ever had been. From 1928 till the Second World War, Stalin did heavily strengthen the country, so much so that they were eventually successful in stopping Germany capturing the country and drove them back across Europe. Also under Stalin there were advances in medicine and education and enormous numbers of people learned to read and write. ...read more.

Conclusion

I say its reliability is debatable because it would be most likely that this would be a false speech for this man fears for his life but on the other hand it was published by a British academic who should have no need to praise Stalin. What swung it for me however that this source is unreliable is that this British academic actually had a eastern European surname and so is most likely to have connections with Russia and so have a hidden bias. One can see therefore that there is very little reliable evidence that praises Stalin for transforming and strengthening the country. I do feel that Stalin did do great things in Russia and this is shown by Russia's ability to defend itself against Germany in the Second World War. He was though, the cause of many deaths in Russia and he certainly killed people to strengthen his power, so by using my knowledge of the period and the evidence provided in the source I have come to the conclusion that Stalin should be condemned as a mass murderer and a despotic tyrant. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    By 1937 an approximate 18 million people were sent to labour camps while 10 million died and by doing this Stalin injured the USSR immeasurably. This allowed Hitler, the leader of Germany, to invade the USSR while it was very weak and powerless.

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    He wanted what was good for Russia, but the source isn't very reliable as it was written when the public had no freedom of speech so they weren't allowed to say anything unless it was good about Stalin. The rest of the sources suggest that Stalin was more a monster than a man.

  1. "Was life better for the Russian's by 1914 compared to 1900?"

    * Nicholas failed to realise the need for change and didn't realise how much prestige the monarchy had lost in 1905...having Rasputin around also discredited the court further. * His advisers weren't that great. Witte was--> but he was dismissed in 1906 and Stolypin was also great --> but he was assassinated in 1911.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Although in hiding, Deng was a serious contender to the leadership. He had widespread support throughout the bureaucratic and administrative agencies, as well as among the military. Jiang Qing recognised her weakness, only having support among radical students and the extreme left-wing of the party.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    Furthermore, later on after 1945, his childhood home was converted into a shrine. However, there is enough evidence to prove that Stalin went to extremes to expand his popularity. For example, in 1929, for his fiftieth birthday, he received greetings from some organisations that were blatantly made up and didn't even exist.

  2. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answer with ...

    a caring man and that he thought his purges were the only way in which Russia could succeed to become a powerful country in the world. However, this thought cannot be proved true. I think that the only useful evidence about Stalin that can be seriously taken from this source

  1. Source A comes from a cartoon published in Paris in the 1930s. It shows ...

    Apart from the source being unreliable, it is useful as it shows that Stalin wants to be seen as popular and caring. These sources overall give mixed views on Stalin. Source A shows a negative view and source B and C show positive ones.

  2. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    This could refer to the fact that during the purges, members of the N.K.B.D., nicknamed 'The Black Ravens' because they tended to operate under the cover of darkness, arrested many victims.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work