• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

jackrippercourseworkQ5

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Q5. Use all the sources and your own knowledge to explain whether you agree with this view, 'The police were to blame for not capturing Jack the Ripper.' From some of the sources, you can infer that the police were to blame for not capturing Jack the Ripper, whilst from others you can infer that they weren't. One reason that the police were to blame for not capturing Jack the Ripper is that there were two police forces in operation in London during the 19th Century, the City of London and Metropolitan Police. The Ripper murders overlapped into the territory of both police forces but they didn't co-operate with each other to catch him because they were competing against each other. They didn't disclose information to each other. The two forces may have had two pieces of the puzzle but they didn't join it together. The police took very little notice of the first murder and it wasn't investigated thoroughly. Source E says that an informant wasn't taken seriously when he warned that murder would ensue. 'He warned that murder would ensue if matters were left as they were. He was referred from one police office to another, but without making any impression. Then came the first murder.' The disregard that the police showed to this man could have further alienated the public into not helping with the murder. ...read more.

Middle

"The body must not be moved, nor anything about it or in the room or place interfered with, and the public must be excluded." They had never encountered a serial murderer before and there were no precedents to follow in investigating it. Another problem for the police is that witness statements contradicted each other. On the night of Elizabeth Strides' murder, five witnesses claim to have seen the Ripper. The problem for the police is that whilst two witnesses seem to be describing the same person, another witness is describing a person who has similar characteristics but a certain feature that is different. J. Best and John Gardner describe a man who is "weak" and has a "black moustache," whilst William Marshall describes a "stout" man with the "appearance of a clerk" with "no moustache." Matthew Packer supports William Marshall's statement and not J. Best and John Gardner's. Packer describes a man with "broad shoulders" and "maybe a young clerk." It is difficult for the police to follow up on these statements as they all contradict each other. Not only were these descriptions contradictory, they also weren't very accurate. Elizabeth Longs' evidence in Source D doesn't help the police greatly. "I think he was wearing a dark coat but I cannot be sure." She wouldn't have the chance to look at pictures of potential suspects on a computer which are available today. ...read more.

Conclusion

The police at the time of the Ripper murders were thought of as incompetent by the public and people were less inclined to testify against one another, particularly members of the same religion or race. A big factor in criminal convictions in the 21st Century is due to forensic evidence or CCTV cameras placing criminals at the scene of the crime. These technologies are a main line of enquiry for police nowadays but these methods were not available to detectives at the time. The only feasible way of catching the Ripper was to catch him red-handed. This would have been impossible to do considering the number of police officers and resources available to the police at this time. With the use of mobile phones, cars and helicopters, officers these days can move around to track a criminal and intercept him on his escape from another officer. In 1888, a police officer didn't know if a criminal was coming towards him until they saw him/her. The logistics of an operation to catch the Ripper would have been impossible with the network of alleyways that ran through the East End. The police had no idea who they were dealing with because there had never been a serial murderer of this kind before. Police investigations these days are carried out in the way that they investigated previous crimes. Due to the fact that there had never been a serial killer before, there were no precedents or guidelines to follow. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Am I not a Man and a brother?

    I had to carry Samuel, that is what I call him when we are alone and in my mind, on my back while performing the back breaking works in the field, this does not matter for I love my son.

  2. 'The police were not completely to blame for not capturing Jack the Ripper', use ...

    Throughout the evidence in source D it is clear that Elizabeth Long was not sure of what she was saying. '...I think...', '...I cannot be sure...', '...as far as I could tell...', '...he seemed...', '...he looked...', '...as well as I could make out...'

  1. Jack the Ripper - How and why did he evade capture?

    informant was; there is no date or name of the paper that it was published in. Source E is a very reliable source which highlights the police force's inefficiency, the aforementioned source is a police leaflet published after the murders of Elizabeth Stride and Kate Eddowes: "Should you know of

  2. Jack The Ripper - Law and Order in the late 19th century

    police force of 13,319, of who only 1,383 were on the street at one time. The only conditions for entry were a height above 5'9, and be able to read and perform simple arithmetic. Long hours meant police were tired and people could be murdered yards from a policeman without him noticing.

  1. jack the ripper

    But back to source D, as stated it is a witness account into the death of Annie Chapman. The account given is very vague as she uses phrases like "I think" and "as far as I can tell." The main evidence probably come form the first line "he was dark

  2. Jack the Ripper questions and answers.

    Her throat had been slashed from ear to ear and her clothes were soaked in blood. A doctor, Rees Llewellyn, was sent to the scene of the crime, and upon arrival pronounced the woman dead. She had been killed by the wound to her throat.

  1. From the evidence available, trace the development of the Jewellery Quarter in the ...

    Also, they are metals that are soft and can be easily manipulated. This meant that it was easy to press basic shapes into them to create beautiful patterns. It was very easy to set up in the toy trade because the smiths working in the Jewellery Quarter did not need

  2. To what extent do you agree with the view that Kosminski was Jack the ...

    It names Kosminski as a Polish Jew, who lived in Whitechapel, and describes him as having become insane due to many years of indulgence in solitary vice. It also states that he had a great hatred of women, with strong homicidal tendencies, and that he was detained in a lunatic asylum about March 1889.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work