• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

jackrippercourseworkQ5

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Q5. Use all the sources and your own knowledge to explain whether you agree with this view, 'The police were to blame for not capturing Jack the Ripper.' From some of the sources, you can infer that the police were to blame for not capturing Jack the Ripper, whilst from others you can infer that they weren't. One reason that the police were to blame for not capturing Jack the Ripper is that there were two police forces in operation in London during the 19th Century, the City of London and Metropolitan Police. The Ripper murders overlapped into the territory of both police forces but they didn't co-operate with each other to catch him because they were competing against each other. They didn't disclose information to each other. The two forces may have had two pieces of the puzzle but they didn't join it together. The police took very little notice of the first murder and it wasn't investigated thoroughly. Source E says that an informant wasn't taken seriously when he warned that murder would ensue. 'He warned that murder would ensue if matters were left as they were. He was referred from one police office to another, but without making any impression. Then came the first murder.' The disregard that the police showed to this man could have further alienated the public into not helping with the murder. ...read more.

Middle

"The body must not be moved, nor anything about it or in the room or place interfered with, and the public must be excluded." They had never encountered a serial murderer before and there were no precedents to follow in investigating it. Another problem for the police is that witness statements contradicted each other. On the night of Elizabeth Strides' murder, five witnesses claim to have seen the Ripper. The problem for the police is that whilst two witnesses seem to be describing the same person, another witness is describing a person who has similar characteristics but a certain feature that is different. J. Best and John Gardner describe a man who is "weak" and has a "black moustache," whilst William Marshall describes a "stout" man with the "appearance of a clerk" with "no moustache." Matthew Packer supports William Marshall's statement and not J. Best and John Gardner's. Packer describes a man with "broad shoulders" and "maybe a young clerk." It is difficult for the police to follow up on these statements as they all contradict each other. Not only were these descriptions contradictory, they also weren't very accurate. Elizabeth Longs' evidence in Source D doesn't help the police greatly. "I think he was wearing a dark coat but I cannot be sure." She wouldn't have the chance to look at pictures of potential suspects on a computer which are available today. ...read more.

Conclusion

The police at the time of the Ripper murders were thought of as incompetent by the public and people were less inclined to testify against one another, particularly members of the same religion or race. A big factor in criminal convictions in the 21st Century is due to forensic evidence or CCTV cameras placing criminals at the scene of the crime. These technologies are a main line of enquiry for police nowadays but these methods were not available to detectives at the time. The only feasible way of catching the Ripper was to catch him red-handed. This would have been impossible to do considering the number of police officers and resources available to the police at this time. With the use of mobile phones, cars and helicopters, officers these days can move around to track a criminal and intercept him on his escape from another officer. In 1888, a police officer didn't know if a criminal was coming towards him until they saw him/her. The logistics of an operation to catch the Ripper would have been impossible with the network of alleyways that ran through the East End. The police had no idea who they were dealing with because there had never been a serial murderer of this kind before. Police investigations these days are carried out in the way that they investigated previous crimes. Due to the fact that there had never been a serial killer before, there were no precedents or guidelines to follow. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Am I not a Man and a brother?

    Miss Mary was happy for me and Bobby to be married and told me I have to bear many children. My children would be her slaves. I myself belong to Master John, my in my womb is a future good of him, my ability of future child bearing in valuable

  2. Jack the Ripper - How and why did he evade capture?

    any person of whom suspicion is attached, you are earnestly requested to communicate..." The police were requesting co-operation from the public to gain information and support. We can see that they were almost begging for assistance from the public. The reliability is very strong as it is an official police leaflet.

  1. Jack the Ripper questions and answers.

    Later at 12:30am, Police Constable William Smith saw her talking to a man. He described him as thirty years old, about five feet seven inches tall, with dark hair and a moustache. He was wearing a deerstalker hat, a black coat and a white collar and tie.

  2. To what extent do you agree with the view that Kosminski was Jack the ...

    Also According to Anderson and Swanson, identified by a witness as the Ripper, but no charges were brought against him due to the witness's reluctance to testify against "a fellow Jew." This substantiation exhibits that Aaron Kosminski in all probability could have been Jack the Ripper.

  1. Jack The Ripper - Law and Order in the late 19th century

    Most witness reports were published and increased panic within the public. 2) The investigations undertaken of the murder were relatively hopeless in catching the killer, to the point where police would go door to door asking who the Ripper was.

  2. jack the ripper

    Whereas source C just describes the body of the dead, for example stating that the "left hand, lying on the ground, was partially closed, and contain a small packet of cachous" without inferring anything . Source C is useful when used with source A and B and the evidence in

  1. From the evidence available, trace the development of the Jewellery Quarter in the ...

    In the 18th century, however, toys were very different. They were small trinkets such as snuff boxes, candlestick holders, snuffers, buckles, buttons, etc. They were all made from either brass or copper as these were cheap and easy to work with.

  2. The Atomic Bombings of Japan q.5

    Because of this, we can assume that the readers of this newspaper also support America's decision. The newspapers could not give any negative remarks about the bomb because of censorship, and this might raise questions about how much they agree with Truman.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work