• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lenin's death marked the beginning of a period of struggle for leadership between the leading Bolsheviks, at the end of which

Extracts from this document...


Lenin's death marked the beginning of a period of struggle for leadership between the leading Bolsheviks, at the end of which Stalin emerged as the undisputed and unchallenged dictator. Divisions in the party over the future of the Revolution enabled Stalin to position himself in a place of power, providing him with opportunities to rid the party of his opponents from the left and the right. The situation that the party found itself in 1924 was better suited to Stalin's personality for a number of reasons. Stalin was very practical minded, even though he was not an intellectual like his rival Trotsky. He was able to adapt to situations to suit his motives, which is clearly seen when he presented himself as Lenin's chief mourner and closest friend at his funeral by reading out the eulogy and carrying Lenin's coffin. He therefore presented himself as the heir to Lenin's legacy. Moreover, Stalin, though not a theorist, was an effective and shrewd administrator, a quality that earned him the nickname 'Comrade Card-Index'. While his comrades underestimated him, Stalin was able to use his administrative skills to build a large bank of information against his opponents, giving him the ability to blackmail people to follow his orders. ...read more.


Stalin argued that the revolutionary wave that had been hoped for had evidently not happened and so world revolution, as proposed by Trotsky, was unlikely. Stalin contended that that the Soviet Union should be made strong and industrialized before attempting revolution on a world scale. He wanted to make the revolution at home successful so that the capitalistic powers in the West would appeal to it. Clearly this had undertones of patriotism and nationalism, and so Trotsky's attacks on the idea simply portrayed Stalin as the true patriot, defending his idea for the sake of the Soviet Union. Moreover, it enabled Stalin to depict Trotsky as irresponsible and disloyal to the revolution in Russia. This was worsened by the fact that Trotsky had had previous Menshevik connections before the October Revolution, and as the call for Permanent Revolution was similar to that of the Mensheviks, Stalin was effectively able to arouse suspicion over whether Trotsky was a true Bolshevik. Hence, it was Stalin's idea that gained most support. The idea of Socialism in One Country fit in well with Bukharin's right wing views on NEP and thus an alliance formed between them, marking the end of the Triumvirate. ...read more.


Bukharin and Tomsky were removed from their positions of power by 1929 and Rykov was removed in 1930. In conclusion, it can be said that Stalin defeated the left, like the right, by manipulating the party structure and organisation and the key tool that enabled him to do this was his immense power as General Secretary. It is doubtful that without this post Stalin would have been able to outmanoeuvre his rivals in such a way, as controlling the votes and securing his support allowed him to assure the majority beforehand to ensure success. Stalin's personality was most suited to organising the down fall of his opponents and though the issues that divided the Bolshevik party were not deeply ideological and irreconcilable, Stalin magnified them so that he was able to remove his rivals in the struggle for power. The personality of his opponents, such as Trotsky, did not suit to winning the struggle, and a mixture of Stalin's strengths and his opponents' weaknesses allowed him to succeed. The result of his efforts was that the coalition formed in 1924 ceased to exist and Stalin stood as a single dictator, free to implement his policies unchallenged. ?? ?? ?? ?? Fahmida Basith 12B Why was Stalin able to defeat the left and the right of the Party by 1929? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    Due to the state overtaking, the industrial workers could not argue about their treatment also no unions were permitted. Collectivisation did cause misery to many peasants. Collectivisation meant that the end was near for the minor, conventional farms owned by the peasants.

  2. How Successful Were Stalin's Policies During His Leadership of the Soviet Union?

    but honest Communists who were forced to make confessions due cruel and inhumane tortures and subsequently killed. Moreover the military purge of 1938 did not benefit the country at all due to its timing. The purge drastically reduced the size of the Red Army with the execution of some 30,000

  1. Consider this judgement on the consequences of Stalin's leadership of the Soviet Union 1928 ...

    The murder of Kirov, a close rival of Stalin's in 1934, is often seen as the catalyst for the onset of 'High Stalinism' and the establishment of Stalin as the absolute authoritarian. Kirov had made speeches renouncing collectivisation, which greatly angered Stalin.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    The fear of foreign invasion and uncertainty over the survival of communism was due to Russia's backward economy which provoked Stalin to plan ways to quickly industrialise so he could earn praise and glory from his fans in Russia and around the world in the process.

  1. Stalin and Lenin

    popularity was falling and Russia was extremely weak economically and Lenin experienced one of the worst disasters of Russian history, the great famine which was caused by Lenin's new law on farming prices so farmers started growing on enough for themselves and there was a huge shortage of food and

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    (Tukhachevsky suppressed this Vend�e around the middle of 1921.)" (Victor Serge, Memoirs of a Revolutionary 1901-1941, pp. 128-9.) The New Economic Policy Far from representing the interests of the working class, the Kronstadters were reflecting the pressures of the peasantry, who were increasingly disaffected because of the constant requisitions and forced collections of grain, for which they received no manufactured goods in return.

  1. Explain Trotsky's contribution to the success of the Bolsheviks up to 1922

    It just shows the determination and skill of Trotsky had in using ingenious tactics to secure Petrograd and not allowing for the Provisional Government to flee. Now Trotsky and the Bolsheviks had power. The Bolsheviks passed some laws and set up the Cheka (secret police)

  2. Russia 1905-1945 Stalin - man or monster - source based questions

    Another reason which justifies my answer is that in this source of information Stalin said: �� when I told them off having more concern for animals than for men.�� This Source clearly reflects the opposite reaction to what Stalin had answered when he knew that one comrade was missing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work