• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lenin's death marked the beginning of a period of struggle for leadership between the leading Bolsheviks, at the end of which

Extracts from this document...


Lenin's death marked the beginning of a period of struggle for leadership between the leading Bolsheviks, at the end of which Stalin emerged as the undisputed and unchallenged dictator. Divisions in the party over the future of the Revolution enabled Stalin to position himself in a place of power, providing him with opportunities to rid the party of his opponents from the left and the right. The situation that the party found itself in 1924 was better suited to Stalin's personality for a number of reasons. Stalin was very practical minded, even though he was not an intellectual like his rival Trotsky. He was able to adapt to situations to suit his motives, which is clearly seen when he presented himself as Lenin's chief mourner and closest friend at his funeral by reading out the eulogy and carrying Lenin's coffin. He therefore presented himself as the heir to Lenin's legacy. Moreover, Stalin, though not a theorist, was an effective and shrewd administrator, a quality that earned him the nickname 'Comrade Card-Index'. While his comrades underestimated him, Stalin was able to use his administrative skills to build a large bank of information against his opponents, giving him the ability to blackmail people to follow his orders. ...read more.


Stalin argued that the revolutionary wave that had been hoped for had evidently not happened and so world revolution, as proposed by Trotsky, was unlikely. Stalin contended that that the Soviet Union should be made strong and industrialized before attempting revolution on a world scale. He wanted to make the revolution at home successful so that the capitalistic powers in the West would appeal to it. Clearly this had undertones of patriotism and nationalism, and so Trotsky's attacks on the idea simply portrayed Stalin as the true patriot, defending his idea for the sake of the Soviet Union. Moreover, it enabled Stalin to depict Trotsky as irresponsible and disloyal to the revolution in Russia. This was worsened by the fact that Trotsky had had previous Menshevik connections before the October Revolution, and as the call for Permanent Revolution was similar to that of the Mensheviks, Stalin was effectively able to arouse suspicion over whether Trotsky was a true Bolshevik. Hence, it was Stalin's idea that gained most support. The idea of Socialism in One Country fit in well with Bukharin's right wing views on NEP and thus an alliance formed between them, marking the end of the Triumvirate. ...read more.


Bukharin and Tomsky were removed from their positions of power by 1929 and Rykov was removed in 1930. In conclusion, it can be said that Stalin defeated the left, like the right, by manipulating the party structure and organisation and the key tool that enabled him to do this was his immense power as General Secretary. It is doubtful that without this post Stalin would have been able to outmanoeuvre his rivals in such a way, as controlling the votes and securing his support allowed him to assure the majority beforehand to ensure success. Stalin's personality was most suited to organising the down fall of his opponents and though the issues that divided the Bolshevik party were not deeply ideological and irreconcilable, Stalin magnified them so that he was able to remove his rivals in the struggle for power. The personality of his opponents, such as Trotsky, did not suit to winning the struggle, and a mixture of Stalin's strengths and his opponents' weaknesses allowed him to succeed. The result of his efforts was that the coalition formed in 1924 ceased to exist and Stalin stood as a single dictator, free to implement his policies unchallenged. ?? ?? ?? ?? Fahmida Basith 12B Why was Stalin able to defeat the left and the right of the Party by 1929? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How Successful Were Stalin's Policies During His Leadership of the Soviet Union?

    The excessive weakness of all political institutions meant that they developed little no integrity, autonomy or coherence. They could not act independently or structure their own internal operations and were always subject to intervention and control by the leader. Daniels argues that Stalin's refusal to tolerate criticism or disapproval resulted in 'intellectual stagnation, dogmatism and bureaucratic formalism'11.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    strong opposition from the wealthy five million peasants known as the kulaks as they had the most to lose - two or three horse, several cows and a bigger than average size farm. This is exactly what happened as the kulaks overtly refused to share their resources and outputs which

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    New purpose built industrial cities was constructed. Magnitogorsk and Gorki were examples of massive new industrial complexes built during this period. Along with dams for hydro electric power, the Moscow Underground, and education and state benefit was also introduced. However, this was also at an appalling cost.

  2. Source related questions on Joseph Stalin

    The source is fairly reliable, as it is a primary source, but is Dr Hewlett Johnson's own opinion so it is likely to be biased. Dr Hewlett Johnson was a devoted Christian and a socialist. As a result of this, he and Stalin and Dr Johnson had something in common.

  1. Consider this judgement on the consequences of Stalin's leadership of the Soviet Union 1928 ...

    The attack on religion instigated by the Bolshevik Revolution was continued by Stalin, resulting in the imprisonment of Christian leaders and closure of places of worship. Russian citizens were banned from going on pilgrimages to Mecca. Stalin's eventual aim was to transform the largely agrarian nation into an industrial one.

  2. Stalin and Lenin

    One of the first things Lenin did when he came to power was he made peace with Germany, many people in Russia felt betrayed because they considered Germany their biggest enemy. Lenin's opposition grew more and more each day and then the civil war started and it was the whites verses the reds (the communists)

  1. The Bolsheviks, Lenin & Stalin - source based quiestions

    Source D does have some useful points. It is written by Stalin and in it he is saying how he doesn't like what is happening in Russia. This is useful to see because he was the leader of Russia and he should have been able to stop all of what he is describing from happening.

  2. Russia 1905-1945 Stalin - man or monster - source based questions

    Bukharin was a clear opponent of Stalin. Bukharin apart from having one of the best brains in the party he was in my opinion the perfect candidate to occupy the post. He was also an old bolshevik, which meant that he knew a lot more than Stalin could know.When Stalin in 1936 set about purging the Communist

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work