• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Policies to end the Depression: Hoover vs. Roosevelt

Extracts from this document...


Policies to end the Depression: Hoover vs. Roosevelt By Carina Uehr "T his campaign is more than a contest between two men. It is more than a contest between two parties. It is a contest between two philosophies of government." - H. Hoover W hen Wall Street crashed in 1929, it spelled the end of a decade of excess. In the 10 years preceding this dramatic event, life (for the middle class upwards at least) had been good. Businesses were booming, and new industries were growing rapidly at a time when consumer confidence was sky-high. When the Stock market crashed on the 24th October 1929, consumer confidence slumped. No-one wanted to spend money anymore, choosing instead to horde it in wait for better times. Even before the Crash, businesses had found that no-one would buy their goods anymore, because everyone who could afford them already had them! Faced with massive losses, bosses cut down production and laid off workers. This massive lay-off of workers caused a huge raise in unemployment which steadily increased until, in 1933, 1 in 4 workers was without a job. Within 5 years, the illusion of wealth and happiness had been cruelly shattered, and was replaced by a general feeling of hopelessness and despair, which named one of the darkest chapters in American history: the great Depression. The two Presidents in power during this time, Herbert Hoover (1919-1933) and Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933 -1945), had very different ideas of how this crisis should be handled. By comparing and contrasting their responses to the problems created by the Great Depression, we can evaluate the impact of their policies and their success in dealing with these problems. T o come to understand why Hoover and Roosevelt had such completely different attitudes and ideas in dealing with the Great Depression, we must first examine their backgrounds and personalities. Herbert Hoover was a strong believer in 'Rugged Individualism', and believed that people should help themselves and not rely on others for their welfare. ...read more.


When he replaced Hoover in 1933, 12.83 million people were out of work. Many thousands of families lived in absolute poverty, often in shanty-towns nick-named 'Hoovervilles', in an unmistakeable jab at the man whom many thought solely responsible for their plight. Hoover was seen by many as a cold old man with no compassion for the ordinary working man and completely in the pockets of America's wealthy businessmen. This was by no means a true judgement of Hoover's character, who was a very caring man, but was trapped completely in his own philosophy. It forbade him to actively interfere with people's affaires, and instead relied upon them to help themselves. He also firmly believed that the Depression was just an economical hitch, and that it would right itself in time if just given a chance. The lowest point of his presidential popularity was the event known as the Bonus Marches, when thousands of WW1 veterans marched on the White House, demanding their retirement bonuses. Hoover did not listen to their demands to bargain with him, instead sending in the army in to disperse them. Hoover refused to acknowledge that people wanted aid from the government, refusing to give out any assistance on a national scale. He believed it would demean the spirit of the American people. (This opinion probably stemmed from the fact that he himself was incredibly patriotic and proud.) Hoover's handling of the Bonus marchers showed how very different he and Roosevelt really were. Roosevelt would never have acted in such a clumsy and brash manner, be it only because he would have seen that the act would very badly damage his popularity. Hoover was very inept at maintaining positive public relations, whereas that was one of Roosevelt's main strengths. The first action of Roosevelt when he came to power was to call an emergency session of Congress. In this marathon session which lasted a hundred days, Roosevelt managed to pass an incredible amount of new policies. ...read more.


His actions in the cases of "balancing the books", the gold standard, trade tariffs and the plain 'Wait and See' policies show that his perceptions of the problems and his subsequent actions were fundamentally wrong, and that they sometimes aggravated the situation even more. Yet, we must also give him the benefit of the doubt: had he been, by some miracle, able to stay in power for another term, would he have begun to take some action similar to Roosevelt's? Would he have continued and expanded what he had begun in the RFC and Hoover Dam? We can only speculate. Roosevelt had several advantages over Hoover: Some lay in their different upbringings and personal beliefs. Hoover was cautious with money, because he knew what it was to go without. Roosevelt had never had to, and was therefore casual about spending $11 billion on one project alone. Roosevelt, no doubt also had the advantage of learning from Hoover's mistakes. Had he been in Hoover's boots in 1929, would he have acted the same way? Hoover was influenced by mighty businessmen who saw it in their best interests to lobby the president into some of his most disastrous actions (for example 'balancing the books'). Roosevelt surrounded himself with a core of innovative and contemporary advisors, who helped him construct and implement many of his policies (eg. The Keynesian Theory of fiscal spending and government regulation of the economy). It can therefore be said that both Hoover and Roosevelt acted with America's best interests at heart. Unfortunately for Hoover, his beliefs were outdated and no longer adequate for the current situation, and he was, just like in the animal kingdom, replaced by a stronger and more competent successor. Roosevelt's responses to the Depression greatly improved the situation and laid the foundations for the modern system of government, which plays an active part in the country's social well-being, and regulates its economic development. He can therefore be safely declared the winner of this contest. The End. 3,962 words, 9 paragraphs (incl. introduction and conclusion), 8 pages in total. Enjoy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. The crash (causes and consequences of the Wall Street Crash)

    Republicans were angry nevertheless that Hoover was prepared to go this far. - The Federal Home Loan Banks were established to discount mortgages - but they were too small scale and relied on voluntarism on the part of the banks.

  2. The Wall Street crash, the great depression and its how it affected the lives ...

    Many felt that it was not even worth the effort of harvesting their crops because of the extremely low prices. This meant that the economy of the entire industry was reduced. So gradually the poor in the farming areas continued to get poorer as the great depression demolished the American economy.

  1. In the 1920's America was the richest and most powerful country in the world ...

    Most Republicans were rich so they had to pay high taxes and many were businessmen. They were alarmed at the vast sums of money Roosevelt was spending on the unemployed and did not believe the country could afford it. They feared that Roosevelt's policies would make the poorer people idle.

  2. Why people supported Roosevelt in the 1932 election

    However, from our knowledge we know that Roosevelt did receive thousands of letters informing him of the successes of his policies. It can be argued that this source only represents one family out of millions, and therefore does not provide us with reliable information about public opinion towards the New Deal at the time.

  1. How do the philosophies of President Hoover with those of President Roosevelt compare, in ...

    Workers were idle because firms would not hire them to work their machines; firms would not hire workers to work machines because they saw no market for goods; and there was no market for goods because workers had no income to spend (Greenhaven Press 24)."

  2. The nature and the causes of the Great Depression of 1929 in America.

    Under this pressure the bank system also broke down. The unemployment grew from 1,5 million to 13, a quarter of all employees. The turning point came in the winter of 1932 to 33. The economy recovered slowly and unevenly. In 1940 the industrial production reached the status of 1929 again.

  1. Why Did The Policies Of President Hoover Fail To Combat The Great Depression Effectively?

    The Agricultural Marketing Act was passed in 1929, creating a nine-person Federal Farm Board with funds of $500 million to create 'stabilisation corps', and the crops created were eventually bought back at higher prices. The agricultural policy failed for two reasons: firstly because it paid US farmers artificially high prices

  2. Cuban Missile Crisis

    Source C is an extract from the book "13 days" written by Robert Kennedy in 1968. Source C is showing Robert Kennedy's account of what happened from the 16th October and onwards to do with the missiles. The source is useful to a historian studying the Cuban Missile Crisis because

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work