• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prohibition - How far does Source I prove the policeman in Source J is telling the truth?

Extracts from this document...


Study Source I & J How far does Source I prove the policeman in Source J is telling the truth? (7) Prohibition was introduced in order to wipe out what was considered to be a great evil at the time - alcohol. This was a controversial issue at the time. There were many areas in society, which supported Prohibition, and some areas that opposed Prohibition. Organisations such as the 'Anti-saloon league' and the 'Women's Christian Temperance Union' supported Prohibition. They said that alcohol was destroying family life and men went to saloons and spent all their money, saving none for their children or families. However, the people who opposed Prohibition said that it took away the right of alcohol from the American people. The consequences of Prohibition was that there was a huge rise in organised crime and also many ordinary Americans were resorting to crime as they wanted alcohol. There were 'speakeasies', which distributed alcohol illegally and 'bootleggers' who supplied it illegally - An example was William McCoy, who was a rumrunner. Prohibition also created a rise in organised crime, and gave way to the rise of gangsters, such as Al Capone, who bribed people to "turn a blind eye" to his work. ...read more.


This was a national newspaper and so, reached all over the nation. The author of this Source must have been very brave, as a person who produced an article in derogation of Al Capone got attacked and was beaten up. Therefore, as the cartoon producer knew the consequence of producing such a cartoon, he would have produced the truth, as it was like a suicide mission. Source J was an account given by a policeman. It was in Chicago during Prohibition, around the 1920s. The purpose was to show the people what sort of tactics was used in order to bribe the police officers of the city. It shows that the officials were involved as well. He says 'It was a conspiracy and my superior officers were involved in it'. This is similar to what is being said in Source I, however, this goes a bit further in saying that the officers who were further down in the tree were also being bribed. It says 'I opened it (the envelope) and there was $75 in it'. Source J also shows that if he didn't accept the bribes than he would be sent to a job that was no good. ...read more.


From my own knowledge I also know that bribes were taken by people with high authority to turn a blind eye. The fact that a journalist was beaten up for criticising Al Capone shows that the journalist that produced Source I was incredibly brave to criticise politicians, and therefore, must have been telling the truth. Source E agrees that the levels of alcohol consumed had increased, which could link in with the fact that nothing was done to stop alcohol being consumed. Source F does not agree with the Sources, as Kramer believed that the police would help enforce Prohibition, whereas Sources I and J show that this wasn't the case, as the police were being bribed to not enforce Prohibition. I believe that both Sources showed truth to some extent, as they agreed with each other to some extent, and, as per my previous research, it is true, as most police did take bribes, as Al Capone bribed the top people in the city so that he could effectively take over the city. However, it is difficult to check how far these Source I proves Source J, though I can presume, looking at the evidence, that it supports it quite well. Abbas Tejani Prohibition part (e) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition - source based.

    This is a metaphor meaning that the money that would be used to keep the family is being used to buy alcohol. This is emotive because it shows neglected children, which makes you feel sorry for them. This source is also for prohibition and against alcohol because like source C

  2. Study sources I and J, How far does source I prove that the policeman ...

    All the men are lined up together symbolizing that they all believe in the same thing. Source J is a 'Policeman talking about Chicago in the 1920's'.

  1. History - Prohibition

    1929 saw the end of the gangster era. They had made millions during the 1920s through the sale of illegal alcohol. The end of this era came as a result of the population's awareness of the extent of violence these gangsters were willing to use to get what they wanted.

  2. Prohibition - source based questions.

    wanted to be seen as doing a good job in tackling prohibition they may not be entirely reliable. It can also be argued that the state was taking prohibition seriously and was investing a lot into preventing it from failing.

  1. Was Prohibition bound to fail? - source related study.

    However, analysing the source further highlights otherwise. If the number of illegal distilleries seized has increased so much, as with the spirits, this means more alcohol was continuing to be produced. This fact indicates that Prohibition was not successful, as my own knowledge tells me that the Volstead Act banned the manufacture of alcohol.

  2. Prohibition - source based research.

    It also tells us that the common policemen accepted bribes. I believe source E is quite reliable because it was wrote after the prohibition. The cop would not be telling lies after the prohibition, he is just recalling on the event.

  1. How far does Source I prove that the policeman in Source J is telling ...

    Speakeasies were illegal places to drink, and so this is agreeing with Source I's message that Prohibition was failing. One way in which Source I is in disagreement with Source J is that Source I shows the policeman to be ready and waiting for a bribe to come along, whereas

  2. Source A and Source B struggle to agree on the causes of prohibition. I ...

    Source D has much the same message. This pictures two young children, one older than the other. The older holding the younger child's hand. They are standing outside the entrance to a saloon. Both look quite upset and are certainly not over dressed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work