• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prohibition movement in America1920-1932.

Extracts from this document...


Guy Hollidge year 11 - History Coursework Mr Przybylski November 2002-11-27 Prohibition movement in America 1920-1932 When the 18th Amendment to the Constitution was passed, the supporters of Prohibition believed it would lead to a better America - more moral and successful. In actual fact, Prohibition created many more problems than it was supposed to solve. Illegal alcohol (moonshine and bootleg): moonshine was produced illegally by individuals. This can lead to alcohol that is poisonous. Bootleg alcohol was imported illegally and during the Prohibition, tens of thousands of illegal stills were set up around the country. Bootleg alcohol could be brought across land borders of Canada and Mexico and by sea. Tens of thousands of miles of coastline made this easy. Another problem was that the few thousand Prohibition agents could not keep track of every border crossing or every section of coastline. Since Prohibition agents were paid very little a week, it was easy for criminals to bribe them to turn a 'blind eye'. The demand for alcohol increased by more than threefold (23,000 speakeasies in New York alone) and alcohol consumption per person actually increased during Prohibition. Soon criminals realised that massive profits could be made from supplying the speakeasies around the country and criminals bribed police and politicians to turn a blind eye. Both sources agree that the main pressures to ban alcohol came from the public. Source A says it was the Anti-Saloon League. ...read more.


This is clearly shown by the suffering of the woman shown in Source C and the little girl and her brother saying and in source D, by the little girl saying to her brother "And our shoes and stockings and food are in the saloon too, and they'll never come out". Alcoholism was the main reason for the banning of alcohol. By the spending of the week's wages in the saloons, the family might not be able to eat. The slogan "The poor man's club - the most expensive in the world to belong to" was very true for families in America before the Prohibition. The artist of Source C was for Prohibition because of how he shows the woman weeping and the way the picture is set out to show the man giving the money away. I think source D is also for Prohibition. It catches the ordinary man-in-the-street's eye and because it is Guy Hollidge year 11 - History Coursework Mr Przybylski November 2002-11-27 two children looking poor, hungry and sad it might make him think twice before he spends all his money on alcohol. Source E: I think that the more reliable source is E because when it was written and that person that wrote it, John D Rockerfeller Jr. He was an industrialist and wouldn't have been affected by prohibition. John F Kramer said is the first prohibition commissioner and needs to show strength and to show that it will work. ...read more.


He handed me an envelope, I took it and he was gone. I opened it and there was $75 in it'". This shows that police on the streets were being bribed. Since Prohibition agents were paid very little and it was very for criminals to bribe them to "turn a blind eye". Conclusion Do the sources support the view that the failure of prohibition was inevitable? Source A supports the view that prohibition was going to fail because is states that there was widespread crime. "For no earlier law had gone against the daily customs... of so many Americans". Source B just mentions that "Al Capone had turned the avoidance of prohibition into nig violent business". It doesn't make a judgement. Sources C and D are for prohibition but do not state that it would fail. Source E the speaker didn't think at the time that prohibition would fail so he would not be saying that it would inevitably fail but he did admit that prohibition did fail in the end. The view in source F is optimistic that prohibition was going to work but it was fold that prohibition was a complete failure. Source G and H show that prohibition wasn't working and it was a failure but it doesn't state that prohibition was bound to fail. Source I is saying that prohibition was not going to work because all the people that were in power taking bribes so that they would turn a blind to drinking and the making of alcohol. Source J is just a police officer's witness and can not be used to judge the whole situation. 1 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition bound to fail?

    Union who had strong influence at the time, these groups saw the evils of alcohol. The success of these groups was evident as by 1917, twenty-three states had introduced a ban on alcohol. However putting a ban on alcohol in urban areas was a much harder task to accomplish.

  2. The USA: Was prohibition bound to fail?

    Despite this, as he later goes on to describe the extent to which prohibition had failed, it is apparent that he believes the law was broken with the greatest of ease, suggesting that prohibition was doomed from the start - Prohibition was bound to fail if the law could lose such a vast amount of respect among citizens.

  1. American History Coursework

    it created hundreds of thousands of jobs for citizens who were willing to erect the dams - providing salvation and wages for many Americans who were locked in a constant struggle which was subsequent to the Wall Street Crash. In addition to this, it prevented many natural disasters which, before

  2. Was Prohibition bound to Fail

    It's these people that tell the policeman in source J to move on and not try to enforce prohibition. In the long run prohibition failed because of this. F) Many of these sources support the view that the failure of prohibition was inevitable.

  1. History - Prohibition

    The statistics given do not give the proportion of the total; that is to say, they only give the number of stills and gallons seized, and give no idea of how many actually existed. However, it can be seen that there was been an increase in the number seized.

  2. To what extent did America

    Blacks also suffered prejudice from other racial groups in their communities; gangs would beat them in parks, beeches and playgrounds in Irish and Polish areas. They would also receive hostile behaviour from poor whites. This all resulted in the ghetto areas where one racial group is concentrated and others excluded.

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    For no earlier law had gone against the daily customs, habits and desires of so many Americans.' In saying this we are aware that the writer of this source most probably does support the view that the failure of prohibition was inevitable because it went against what so many people wanted.

  2. Was Prohibition Bound To Fail?

    In this repsect he was quite practical. This realisation may not have been in accordance with his personal opinion but he was able to see both sides of the argument. John F. Kramer, as the first Prohibition Commissioner had the task of enforcing Prohibition.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work