• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

question 5 source questions Arab Israeli conflict

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 5 History Coursework Question: Which interpretation is best supported by the evidence in these sources and your knowledge of the Arab-Israeli conflict? There are many interpretations of who was to blame for The Six Day war some accusing the Israelis of being the aggressors and some accusing the Arabs of being the aggressors. I will assess these two using the sources and my own knowledge to see which one is more supported. a). 'the Arab powers were threatening her (Israel) with destruction Egypt had already closed the Gulf of Akaba which she knew Israel would regard as an act of war' b). 'Israel, urged on by the USA (went to war) to overthrow the Syrian government and suppress the movement for the liberation of Palestine.' Source B, D, F, G, H agree with the first statement completely giving evidence of Arab aggression and threats. Source B shows a Jewish man being forced into the sea by the aggressive unified Arab armies. This gives the impression that the Arab armies are pushing forwards and being the aggressors. It was published in an Arab newspaper just before the war to reflect the public hatred of the Jews so although it did reflect public opinion it could have also been used as propaganda to 'rally the troops' it cannot be classed as totally reliable as it was published in an Arab newspaper therefore it could be bias. ...read more.

Middle

Source H also agrees with statement a) as it states that 'terrorism had been increased by the Arab sates to a fearsome point'. This shows the Arabs as the aggressors it also states that the Soviets stated at the UN meeting that 'an air attack was being prepared by Israel against Syria in preparation for the invasion of Syria' this was a false claim but it gave Nasser an excuse to move his troops into Syria. The statement by the USSR was seen by the Israelis as a setup just so that Nasser could move his troops in. This source was published after the war making it a reliable source as it could look at the war and asses what really happened. Even so it is still written by the Israelis therefore it could be seen as bias as it is after the war they might be trying to blame it on the Arabs and explain why they made the first strike. Consequently I would not value this source as terribly reliable. Sources E and I agree with statement b). Source E is a statement made by the Egyptian Deputy Commander-in-Chief of their armed forces. It states that it was Israel that was making the aggressive moves towards the Arab states. It talks of them "directing military blows towards the Arab people or Syria." ...read more.

Conclusion

The reliability of this source is questionable however as it was in a British magazine. This raises two issues first being that it was published in a magazine that is a rather Tabloid type of journalism that often uses a lot of hyperbole in its articles that may be evident in this picture. Secondly it was British therefore it could be getting back at the USSR and the USA as they were very critical of the way the British acted in the Suez Crisis and the way Britain and France invaded like they did. This criticism caused the British and French to pull out of the Suez Canal which obviously made the British look bad. This source could be seen as revenge accusing them of starting the Six War. Therefore I see this source supporting both statements as the USSR gave weapons and munitions to the Arabs giving them great support and the USA gave weapons and munitions to the Israelis. Therefore it supports both statements but maybe supporting statement b) a little bit more as it makes it clear that Israel was supported by the USA - 'urged on by the USA'. More sources support statement a) as I believe it was closer to the truth of the conflict between the Arabs and the Israelis. As it was clear that the Arabs were the more aggressive ones as they were the ones making more threats and uniting together against the Israelis and they were threatening Israel with destruction. Joe Sharp ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. How did the Cold War begin?

    his actions were in danger of pushing South Vietnam supported by the USA towards Communism. However in order to carry out what Johnson wanted to do, he needed a reason. The Gulf of Tonkin incident ("an alleged pair of attacks by naval forces of North Vietnam against two American destroyers,

  2. arab/israeli conflict

    During the Second World War the Jews were persecuted by the Nazis and sent to concentration camps. By the end of the war in 1945 6 million Jews were killed and 250,000 were freed from the concentration camps. As news about the holocaust emerged there was widespread sympathy for the Jews especially in the U.S.A.

  1. Charles the first was completely responsible for the civil war- to what extent is ...

    historians say that parliament went too far when they made their demands, one of the most brutal thing they did was that the forced Charles to execute his advisor and put the arch bishop to jail. This is a long term cause.

  2. Arab-Israeli Conflict

    under the control of a united Arabia led by Egypt and under Russian influence. When that moment comes Nasser can deny oil to Western Europe and we shall all be at his mercy". He expressed his concern over the growing relationship between the USSR and Egypt, and also feared that

  1. history coursework - arab israeli conflict

    The source fails to mention the Infitada or "uprising", which was the civil disobedience that grew in parts of Israel. It consisted of riots and protests led by Arabs. The Infitada happened before the source was written, so they have no excuse for not writing about it in the pamphlet.

  2. The Arab/ Israeli conflict is about religion and so no other factor is important. ...

    The Jews were forced out and scattered through the Roman Empire this was known as the Diaspora and some Jews were sold to slavery. The Jews moved to live in other parts of the Roman Empire and were forced to live in ghettoes which were cramped.

  1. Arab-Israeli Conflict

    They felt that more force was necessary and were not prepared to wait for numerous years in order to come to a peaceful resolution. Fatah was founded by Yasser Arafat, who was also chairman of the Palestinian Liberation Organisation. The athletes were initially held hostage and the terrorists demanded the

  2. Gallic war

    - Caesar acted ruthlessly; arrested German envoys prior to the battle and later killed all the women/children from the Germanic tribe they had fought. - Caesar built a spectacular bridge (280m by 12m) across the Rhine; had his troops march across it and back, then destroyed it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work