• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Reform followed by Reaction is a dangerous strategy for any government to follow and the best example of this are the governments of Alexander II and Nichols II. Both Alexander and Nicholas were inconsistent

Extracts from this document...


Reform followed by Reaction is a dangerous strategy for any government to follow and the best example of this are the governments of Alexander II and Nichols II. Both Alexander and Nicholas were inconsistent in their policies However; Alexander had the qualities of an autocrat while Nicholas didn't. Nicholas was small compared to his Romanov Family members and his was too kind and quiet. He "had no insides" and in the face of danger, he would fun out of fear unlike his grandfather Alexander who would simply tighten his grip on Russia. Also, unlike Alexander, Nicholas was never around his people. Even though both Alexander and Nicholas didn't mingle with the peasants, Alexander stayed in Russia and knew what was going on with his people. Alexander II was a passionate reformer. Other than freeing the serfs, he wanted to revise the judicial system, extend education, reform the military, increase foreign trade, and spark the growth of industry. ...read more.


This constant back and forth would lead to the first revolution of 1917. Both Alexander II and Nicholas II had incompetent generals and people who carried out their orders. When Alexander II reformed the Courts, judges would take bribes to change the ruling on cases. During the Russian-Japanese war, Nicholas tried to prevent the Japanese from overrunning Port Arthur by sending the Baltic fleet. However, the fleet was incompetent and their incompetence caused serious humiliation to the Russian navy and the government. This led to the beginning of the 1905 riots. Even during WWI, most of Nicholas' generals were Incompetent and believed that the bayonet was superior to the machine gun. During both their reigns, Alexander and Nicholas had to deal with incompetence. Alexander was a direct reformer. Every reform policy came from him and he made sure they went through. Nicholas had no real reform but his Prime Minister Peter Stolypin had some reform. ...read more.


Alexander was constantly terrorized by radical factions because his reforms were destroying their cause and the only way to get their point across was by killing Alexander. Nicholas had to face the entire country. The humiliating Russian-japanese war in 1904, the flip-flop involving the October manifesto in 1906, and finally the utter destruction of Russian forces during WWI made everybody hate Nicholas. There was no way to contain this hatred except give into the people, which still didn't work since he was assassinated in 1917 by the Bolsheviks. Nicholas was unfit to be a Tsar. He had no backbone and couldn't control his own people. Alexander was Tsar material, but his inconsistent policy caused his downfall. The reign of both Alexander II and Nicholas II clearly show that being a reformer then a reactionary in the same reign is very dangerous. However, it was more dangerous for Nicholas since he was a weak leader than for Alexander. Alexander had control, Nicholas didn't. Still no matter how reformist or reactionary either Nicholas or Alexander were, Russia was going to hell anyway. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

    5 star(s)

    The Duma lasted just over two months before Nicholas dissolved it for demanding the right to appoint ministers. The next Duma was elected in 1907 and lasted for five months before it too was dissolved. Nicholas then decided to change the voting system so that he would not get any

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Why did Alexander II Emancipate the Serfs in 1861?

    5 star(s)

    This is where Alexander's Conservative side becomes important and must be considered. His famous, striking statement "it is better to abolish serfdom from above rather than await the time when it will begin to abolish itself from below" shows that Alexander knew serfdom posed a threat to his regime.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    'Any defeat on the battlefield would result in a surge of opposition to the Government, which would be blamed for all Russia's failing and backwardness. Complete social revolution would be the probable outcome.' As Durnovo comments earlier Russia was in no fit state to fight and win comfortably.

  2. Tsar Nicholas II

    It had the Tsar at the top and then very noble and rich people towards the top but as a very small quantity, whereas at the bottom of the hierarchy triangle were the peasants who were 84% of the population.

  1. Why and with what consequences did Alexander II adopt more reactionary policies in the ...

    Alexander's reactionary response was to call forth a centralist government. For that matter he dissolved the St. Petersburg Assembly where its most important figures were exiled in 1866. By May 1862, a number of pamphlets were issued including the very radical "Young Russia", which called for extensive changes in the nature and statute of the Russian State.

  2. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    This means that the source is probably true because he does not include his own opinion and so the source is objective. Source G depicts Stalin as a man and not a monster because it gives reasons for why Stalin committed some of the atrocities that he did.

  1. Assess the extent to which the political incompetence of Nicholas II led to the ...

    When Nicholas became Tsar, he was quick to heed advice from others, as he would continue to do through out his rule. It seems that the advice given to him was always weak, poor and corrupting of Nicholas' power. Nicholas first confided with Grand Duke Vladimir, his eldest uncle.

  2. How valid is the view that the reign of Alexander II achieved nothing of ...

    This lead to a boom in population and a growth in industrialization as peasants could finally leave the fields and work in the factories. Better yet, the Russian gentry did not feel the damage to their wealth they thought they would.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work