• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source A is from Werner Willikens, the state secretary, and is a speech that was delivered in February 1934, justifying the lack of written orders form Hitler.

Extracts from this document...


1.Source A is from Werner Willikens, the state secretary, and is a speech that was delivered in February 1934, justifying the lack of written orders form Hitler. Source C is from Fritz Wiedemann's memoir, Hitler's personal assistant recalling Hitler's daily working routine. Both are from people who would have been familiar with Hitler's style of leadership. Source A is a justification of Hitler's "lazy" approach which is described in Source C. Source C states that he "normally appeared around midday". Source C was published in 1964 and although is still reliable as a source, around this time it would have been very controversial to portray Hitler in a positive manner. Source A seems to support Source C, Source A states that "The Fuhrer can hardly dictate from above which he intends to achieve", this seems to support the evidence in source C, "it became more and more difficult to get him to make decisions" but without the positive stance found in source A. ...read more.


Both source show that Hitler took a passive approach to his leadership and Source C show that he left people to make key decisions, while source A shows that the people were brainwashed into thinking that this passive approach was beneficial as when you worked along the Fuhrer's lines you will "one day have the finest reward" 2.Hitler being the master of the third Reich meant that he was fully in control of events and circumstances in Nazi Germany, a typical totaltalirian dictator, the counter view to this was that he was a "weak dictator". I believe the counter argument is true and most of the sources seem to suggest this as well. Source B, which is from a Nazi lawyer commenting on the nature of Hitler's power sets him up as the master of the third reich. ...read more.


Source A seems to suggest that although he was a "weak" dictator ie, he did not take an active approach to his dictatorship, it still seems to suggest that he was in control but simply left others to decide, and to a certain extent Source D agrees with this. Source C and some of Source D seems to suggest he was just lazy, "man who does not decide" and "he disliked the study of documents". The view that Hitler was "master of the third Reich" is a complex one, as it depends on how you define master. It is clear to see that Hitler was not the "Big Brother" dictator his propaganda team tried to create, but this propaganda did create fear and respect for him, that meant he did not necessarily need to be the most active dictator and still be master. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Stalin and Hitler: Differences and Similarities

    Communist, is a very important difference, because this caused their hate against each other, what further probably prevented even more problems. Hitler killed millions of Jews, and other "non-Aryans," while Stalin caused the death of millions of peasants, which died because of starvation - so on both sides millions of people died, because of the political ideas of their dictators.

  2. Were contemporaries correct in blaming Hitler for the Reichstag Fire?

    In this account, Diels makes it clear that he is in no doubt about Van der Lubbe's guilt. In his opinion, Van der Lubbe came across so much like a 'maniac' that it seemed as if he could have carried out the fire on his own.

  1. Causes of the February 1917 revolution

    This made things even harder for the Tsar and he found it hard to keep in control all of the time as other people had to help him. Another long term cause was the lack of transport networks, the war effort clogged up the railways with military transport, so food couldn't get into the towns.

  2. Benito Mussolini Informative Speech

    The people should also do their own part to avoid growth of dictatorship. First and foremost, they should avoid personal cult of any political leader. No one is perfect although the dictators always pretend to be. Take a look at all the dictators from ancient time to recently, the Roman

  1. Am I not a Man and a brother?

    Because of these, I am one of the people who find the whip lashes on our back all the time; one of my ears had been cut off for doing this too often. Sometimes I had to wear a nick ring so I could not lie down after exhausting long days.

  2. The Panchayat system as an early form of conflict resolution in Trinidad.

    the institutions reconstituted."10 One can safely say then, that the movement from the plantation Diaspora to that of village settlement not only facilitated the re-emergence and growth of the Panchayat but also the resurgence of others facets of Indian culture.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work