• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Stalin was personally responsible for the Purges in Russia in the 1930s". Agree or disagree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Stalin was personally responsible for the Purges in Russia in the 1930s". Agree or disagree? In my opinion, this statement can not be definitely answered. However, I do have some certain facts and interpretations that can be deduced to construct an argument for this question. The expression 'purge' is defined as "to remove undesirable elements from..." and in my opinion, the term 'purge' in the context of Russia in the 1930s described exactly this. The Purges were the political method adopted by Stalin to rid himself of critics, potential rivals and their supporters. In Russia during 'the Great Terror' which lasted between 1928 and 1940, there were three major purges: the military purge which began in 1937, the NKVD purge which began in 1939 and the most major purge of all; the political purge, also known as the Yezhovschina, which began in 1936 up until 1938. I agree with the statement to a greater extent than to which I disagree with it, because this method of "cleansing" of opposition to Stalin's regime was evident even before the purges began. For example, 'collectivisation' and 'industrialisation' featured murder on a massive scale. In 1928, there was subtle evidence of opposition to Stalin and his plans when the peasantry did not agree with the 'collectivisation' and as a result thousands of Kulaks were executed and an estimated 5 million were deported to Siberia. In my opinion, this is evidence of Stalin's cruel, exaggerated tactics to handle opposition. ...read more.

Middle

did not seem to please Stalin anymore (the novelty had worn off) and he was removed from his post and replaced immediately with Yezhov. This also ties in with another reason for the beginning of the purges. Stalin wanted total submission from his Party and the USSR and Iagoda was obviously not displaying enough persistence anymore, as he did not want to press charges against Rykov. This leads me to believe that Iagoda was removed due to the slightest hint of 'insubordination'. Furthermore, one person who would witness the 'real' Stalin, for example, his habits, plans and complete personality would be family members. Therefore I believe Stalin had a ruthless personality and he was mainly, if not completely responsible for the purges. My evidence is that his wife committed suicide after she openly criticised him for the suffering collectivisation had caused countless Soviet peasants. These desperate, dramatic actions demonstrate her fear of Stalin. She of all people would witness that he was capable to be vicious and that her criticism was a fatal mistake. Another factor to show Stalin's personal responsibility, is that the 'show trials' were a legal process, therefore how did Stalin not know they were happening. Furthermore, several of these trials were held in Moscow as an example for the trials of local courts. How did Stalin not become aware of this, they were being held in the capital city! The 'show trials' allowed the NKVD to execute whoever was suspected of treason. The NKVD prepared lists of people it proposed having shot or sentenced to long prison terms. ...read more.

Conclusion

I also believe that he was responsible for Kirov's death. It set off a chain of events which culminated in the Great Terror. I believe Stalin was in need of a pretext to launch a broad purge and he evidently decided that murdering or having Kirov murdered would be expedient. This also enhances my judgement that he wanted to rid himself of opposition, as Kirov was popular and urged to challenge Stalin for leadership, therefore he was Stalin's definition of opposition and a threat. The murder would have been "killing two birds with one stone". However, I am also undecided whether Stalin was personally responsible, because if Stalin was indeed solely responsible and had enough power to control the killing of 30 million people, then why did he have any opposition at all? Furthermore, Stalin's daughter agreed her father had a paranoid personality, but she believed it was poisoned by men around him, such as Yezhov, so he saw threats everywhere. This also ties in with the factor that the methods used by the NKVD may not have been Stalin's idea. For example, it was the NKVD who pushed to be able to lower the death penalty which could be applied to the traitors' families down to the age of 12. Overall, I believe that it is completely evident that Stalin was responsible for the Purges, even if he did not invent the methods or suggest them to the NKVD; he was the leader of the Party and the state and therefore had the overall control of matters and effects that came about. Alicia Fleming 13E A2 History Russian Essay Mr Chapman ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    in Russia were tutored and became literate and good with numbers, almost all areas of Russian industry was increased by some amount and farmers were given tractors and other heavy machinery to help them produce crops. The Five Year Plans did help to create a modernised and developed country, also

  2. How did Stalin control Russia from 1924-1953?

    This is how the cult of personality helped him control Russia, because he brainwashed Russian citizens into believing that Russia would collapse if he were not in power. Stalin also circulated many posters of him and Lenin together. Lenin was seen as the father of the Revolution and (along with Trotsky)

  1. Why Did Stalin Use Terror and Purges in Such a Comprehensive Way during the ...

    This was beneficial as it allowed Stalin to make all of the decisions that he needed to make in order to achieve his policy of catching up with the west. The forced pace of industrialisation and the implementation of collective farming in order to achieve his economic aims required a disciplined workforce and a compliant peasantry.

  2. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    In its congress in 1934, Zhdanov told the members to only create Socialist Realism art. These were paintings, poems, plays and novels about ordinary people and about working lives.

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    In the cartoon, it shows 4 men who are on a show trial. They are all admitting to guilt as if it wasn't a big deal- "Yes I'm guilty!", "Sure, I tried to betray my country", "of course I'm a traitor!", "There's no doubt about my guilt!".

  2. Assess the Impact Stalin Had On Russia and Its People Stalin came to ...

    Therefore collectivisation was against the interests of the peasants. In 1932, the government doubled the tax amounts and started to take double the amount of grain from the peasants. As this went on, the Kulaks, who were the richer peasants, started to refuse to give their land and produce to the government.

  1. Explain the effects of Stalins purge in the Soviet Union in the 1930s

    He was also at least homicidally paranoid. However, by 1939, he had set up a personal totalitarian dictatorship where - on one word from him - the entire Soviet Union did exactly what he said. In the second stage, Stalin turned on Zinoviev and Kamenev, who were beginning to have doubts about Stalin's policies and motives.

  2. Stalin was able to strengthen his dictatorship in the 1930s was mainly through a ...

    Writers were also kept under strict control and were forced to promote the state and Stalin?s policies. The cult of personality also included his statues everywhere and cites were named after him such as Tsaritsyn became Stalingrad. He did not only control the arts but also the media to project a positive image of him.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work