• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Suez crisis 03 coarsework source evaluation

Extracts from this document...


Study source A What can we learn from Source A about Anthony Eden's reasons for opposing Colonel Nasser? Anthony Eden was Prime Minister at the time of the Suez Crisis in 1956. Sir Anthony Eden most certainly thought badly of Colonel Nasser, Eden saw Colonel Nasser as the next Hitler and was determined to make a stand against him. Throughout the radio and television broadcast Eden argues a cast iron case against Nasser. Nationalizing the Suez Canal threatens British links abroad and her economy. It is an artery between the motherland and the empire but it is 'not vital to Egypt.' Legally, Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal without 'consent' or 'consultation.' As far as Eden is concerned Nasser has 'seized it' and broken international law. Then Eden says, "Our quarrel is not with Egypt, it is with Colonel Nasser". Here he is giving an impression to the people of himself. I think this shows to the British people that it is just a war against the colonel and not the people of Egypt. So it is different to the war that had recently ended which was the Second World War. Eden is hurt and appalled by Nasser's treatment towards Britain as he 'conducted a vicious propaganda campaign against this country.' Nasser is shown as a bad person and 'not a man who can be trusted.' ...read more.


Eisenhower said to Eden that a 'method must be attempted before action.' He warns Eden that there is not much support from America or the UN and not to heed the advice 'is virtually to destroy that institution.' Source F is another extract from the Daily Mirror, this time, a letter from a reader. Again, this source is not entirely reliable as it is only one person's view. This may well represent a number of people who would have written along the same lines, but it is still not entirely clear just from the sources given that the majority of public opinion was against Eden's decision to take military action. The majority of people in this argument did not think that Eden's idea was a good one. Source D is probably the only one out of the 3 sources that actually supports Eden. Concluding Eden's decision was not accepted by the people of his country and highly unpopular. Study sources G and H. Does source G support Selwyn Lloyd's statement (source H) about Britain's motives for military action against Egypt? Explain your answer by referring to both sources. Source G is an extract from a letter written by Anthony Eden to the President of the United States regarding Suez. In this he states his primary concern is to free the Suez Canal from Egypt's control. His secondary purpose is to remove Nasser from power and replace him with a regime more favourable to the western powers. ...read more.


This is a letter seeking support and also clarification of their objectives. It says "I do not think that we disagree about our primary objective." The words "I do not think," tell us that they are unclear and so no action has been approved by Eisenhower and this is important because Britain desperately need America's support because they are a very influential super power. Source H shows us that like Nasser, Selwyn Lloyd and certainly Eden believed 'his government had done what was right.' But the source does suggest that Selwyn Lloyd is not quite as cemented to his views as Eden is. Unfortunately the world did not agree with Eden and Britain subsequently looked very foolish, especially after America froze all of Britain's assets and 'forced an end to the invasion.' The Suez Crisis demonstrated how much the United Nations was needed in the world. It was they who ordered the withdrawal of troops from the Suez area. I think the role which the USA and Dwight D Eisenhower took was very influential to the withdrawal of troops as well as the United Nations. The increase of oil prices and blockage of the canal caused America to apply pressure on Britain and France to stop the fighting. After the whole Suez saga, Britain is said to have dropped from its former status as a world super power. There relationship with other countries were changing for the worse and so this is why many people believe that Britain is not as influential in the world as it was 60 to 70 years ago. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1945-1991 essays

  1. Decolonization of India - analysing the sources.

    Essentially the meltdown of the 'imperial system' meant the loss of Britain's financial and economic independence.

  2. Why did the Suez Canal crisis of 1956 take place?

    Thus on 19th July 1956 USA withdrew all aid towards Egypt for the Aswan Dam project. The Suez Canal held a lot of importance for many European countries trying to do trade with the rest of the world. As the Suez Canal cut travel time as ships did not have to travel all across Africa.

  1. Suez Crisis

    war against Nasser, Britain was forced to deal with the long term repercussions which are still being felt today. The Suez Crisis proved to be a national disaster for the Eden and his Cabinet because soon as the conflict ended it came to light that Eden had been aware of

  2. Suez Canal Crisis


  1. Question 2. Explain why the rest of the World is so interested in the ...

    Jihad has a much small support base. Unlike the far bigger Hamas, which runs schools and hospitals, Islamic Jihad has no real social or political role yet. The next point I will be talking about will be World Peace. The countries of the World also are interested in the Palestine

  2. " Individuals do not 'shape' historical events; the best they can do is to ...

    Many people wished to emulate their struggle and create more Vietnams as Che had called for. Protestors in search for "freedom" and "justice" around the world felt great respect and admiration towards him. A favourite quote I like to use to describe Che Guevara is, "he was an inspiration for

  1. Cold War Short Essays - Questions and Answers.

    This highlighted how tense relations had become. A further reason was because of Kennedy?s speech ?Ich Bin Ein Berliner? (I am a Berliner). Kennedy made a visit to West Berlin and declared that the city was a symbol of the struggles between forces of freedom and communism.

  2. Cold War Summary, quotes and revision notes.

    2 superpowers build up stores of nuclear weaponry, peaceful coexistence became more possible - as long as they knew they could impose damage on the other the relationship could remain stable Moscow Summit 1972 - Between Nixon and Brezhnev - Strategic Arms Limitation Talks - Bot sides signed the SALT

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work