• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The 1905 revolution was no real threat to Tsardom

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The 1905 revolution was no real threat to Tsardom. For many hundreds of years Russia had been run by the Romanov dynasty. They had ruled over Russia with unlimited power sanctioned by arbitrary power which they believed that god had given to them. However in the early 20th century discontent started to grow. The tsar became inundated with calls for change and to end his and his family's autocratic rule. It can be said that revolution was in the air but many people have debated whether the 1905 revolution had any sort of impact towards the lessening of the tsar's powers. In this essay I will argue that some political advances were made towards democracy, however it will also argue that what did arise from the revolution and the following events ...read more.

Middle

The effect of the 1905 revolution was a psychological change in the people. It would pose a huge treat to the tsar. This was especially evident in the 1917 revolution because he could no longer rely on the support of his people or his army. With the new radical thoughts running through the peasants mind strikes and uprisings soon followed along with national revolts. All these events were exacerbated by the defeat of the Russian Armies in Manchuria, in May 1905. These put pressure on to the tsar to make change to the way in which he ran the country. He had to decide to either control the masses by creating a military dictator ship or to grant the sought after constitution. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Tsar allowed foreign publications to send their materials in to Russia and through the communication network, Lenin and other revolutionary ideas floated to the remotest of villages. Everybody now knew Lenin's socialist party and was suitably impressed by the works in "Pravda", their magazine. Therefore the effect that the 1905 revolution was suppressed by the changes that the tsar made after it. The people of Russia started to see changes in their society which would make their standard of living far greater. By the time of the October Manifesto, in 1905, the Tsar promised more political power in the hands of the people through a national duma. Because of these changes the tsar must have seen his power fading away as an inevitable 2nd revolution loomed up. ?? ?? ?? ?? - 1 - Russian Revolution By Alex Bennett ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Was the October Revolution inevitable

    In basic terms Lenin wanted a smaller party and Martov wanted it to be open to all. This resulted in a split, after a series of votes, in the party becoming two separate parties the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks.

  2. Assess the idea that is the ideologies, which emerge from the French revolution, rather ...

    Napoleon and Wellington had long rival enemies, but yet again Napoleon was defeated. "Napoleonic rule would bring it's own problems and contradictions, but it endured because it began by resolving others that had torn the country apart for more than a decade".

  1. Find out the real cause of the French Revolution

    passage described the town of Combourgh, which, according to Young, was filled with 'filth and poverty'. And here is another passage from the first hand document, describing the poverty of the lower social status: "The poor people seem poor indeed; the children terribly ragged - if possible, worse clad than

  2. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    the Tsar's family lying on the floor" and that "the corpses were taken out to the lorry" implying they were all dead. Moreover, both of these sources agree that the corpses of the victims - the Romanov family and their servants were transported elsewhere by a lorry for their destruction.

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    However source B is unprejudiced whereas as source C is very inclined and gives the impression of the reds being extremely unpleasant. C No I don't agree with the statement. Although source D is an eyewitness account it doesn't mean that it is fully reliable.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    ceased to support the Provisional Government must be one of the greatest mysteries since Saint Paul saw the light on the road to Damascus. But if we leave aside the obvious motivation of spitefulness, malice and impotent rage, we can see that the following passage from a rightwing paper constitutes

  1. Was the defeat in the war the real cause of the Russian Revolution

    Peter Stolypin however decided to change the population of agriculture by bringing in agricultural. Reforms which would encourage private ownership to create a prosperous, stable and loyal peasantry called the Kulaks.

  2. What Happened to the Romanov Family? - source related study

    Sources A and B are very similar in their accounts of what happened to the Romanov family. Source C is a source that covers many of the same aspects of the investigation as the first two sources, but it has drawn different conclusions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work