The 1905 revolution was no real threat to Tsardom

Authors Avatar

        -  -        

The 1905 revolution was no real threat to Tsardom.

For many hundreds of years Russia had been run by the Romanov dynasty. They had ruled over Russia with unlimited power sanctioned by arbitrary power which they believed that god had given to them. However in the early 20th century discontent started to grow. The tsar became inundated with calls for change and to end his and his family’s autocratic rule. It can be said that revolution was in the air but many people have debated whether the 1905 revolution had any sort of impact towards the lessening of the tsar’s powers. In this essay I will argue that some political advances were made towards democracy, however it will also argue that what did arise from the revolution and the following events was a change in peoples attitudes fuelled resentment and was determined and was detrimental to Tsardom and therefore the revolution had a fairly large impact on the autocracy.

Join now!

Within Russia the people had begun to loose respect for the autocracy. After the massacre of Bloody Sunday, the faith and trust that was once held for the tsar was damaged beyond repair. One historian said “Bloody Sunday snapped the “sacred bond” which had united the people with their tsar”. The effect of the 1905 revolution was a psychological change in the people. It would pose a huge treat to the tsar. This was especially evident in the 1917 revolution because he could no longer rely on the support of his people or his army.

With the new ...

This is a preview of the whole essay