• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The 1905 revolution was no real threat to Tsardom

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The 1905 revolution was no real threat to Tsardom. For many hundreds of years Russia had been run by the Romanov dynasty. They had ruled over Russia with unlimited power sanctioned by arbitrary power which they believed that god had given to them. However in the early 20th century discontent started to grow. The tsar became inundated with calls for change and to end his and his family's autocratic rule. It can be said that revolution was in the air but many people have debated whether the 1905 revolution had any sort of impact towards the lessening of the tsar's powers. In this essay I will argue that some political advances were made towards democracy, however it will also argue that what did arise from the revolution and the following events ...read more.

Middle

The effect of the 1905 revolution was a psychological change in the people. It would pose a huge treat to the tsar. This was especially evident in the 1917 revolution because he could no longer rely on the support of his people or his army. With the new radical thoughts running through the peasants mind strikes and uprisings soon followed along with national revolts. All these events were exacerbated by the defeat of the Russian Armies in Manchuria, in May 1905. These put pressure on to the tsar to make change to the way in which he ran the country. He had to decide to either control the masses by creating a military dictator ship or to grant the sought after constitution. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Tsar allowed foreign publications to send their materials in to Russia and through the communication network, Lenin and other revolutionary ideas floated to the remotest of villages. Everybody now knew Lenin's socialist party and was suitably impressed by the works in "Pravda", their magazine. Therefore the effect that the 1905 revolution was suppressed by the changes that the tsar made after it. The people of Russia started to see changes in their society which would make their standard of living far greater. By the time of the October Manifesto, in 1905, the Tsar promised more political power in the hands of the people through a national duma. Because of these changes the tsar must have seen his power fading away as an inevitable 2nd revolution loomed up. ?? ?? ?? ?? - 1 - Russian Revolution By Alex Bennett ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Was the October Revolution inevitable

    'Martov could never emancipate himself from his innate moral cannon. Lenin could veer, prevaricate, intrigue and sow confusion, seeking support from the devil itself if it offered' (Shapiro) At the second congress of the Social Democrats party (1903) these differences were highlighted with a dispute regarding who had the right of membership to their party.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    On the 17th January the decree was passed by the government and signed by Lenin as president of the Council of People's Commissars. But within three months the situation changed again. Supported by Britain and France, the reactionary Polish regime of Pilsudski attacked Soviet Russia.

  1. Assess the idea that is the ideologies, which emerge from the French revolution, rather ...

    (2001 Doyle). The stage was set for a new secular age by his works. The initial impulse of the French revolution was destructive, and the government now assumed that the French people would accept it's place and take a step down.

  2. Find out the real cause of the French Revolution

    diminished and mortality declined.2 Most of the increased number of people was the peasantry. The large number of people limited the work fields and not enough land was provided for all peasants, and therefore resulted in extreme poverty. During that period of time, the Third Estate in France also lived very poorly.

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    Source C is not one sided. He tells you briefly about what Sergeyev thought. However everything he says doesn't make sense because Sergeyev says different things in the source. It also tells up totally different things to the other two sources.

  2. What happened to the Romanov Family? Sourcework

    This means that it is less likely that the information is incorrect, however there is still a large possibility that it is biased, as the British government held similar views on communism to the American government. The fact that the two sources are written in the same year (1918)

  1. Was the defeat in the war the real cause of the Russian Revolution

    This was around the time that he started to question whether Nicholas was able to uphold the autocracy while bringing Russia up to date with Eastern Europe, with countries like Britain and Germany. However because he achieved all of this he brought a threat to the tsar's authority and that of the autocracy so he was dismissed in April 1906.

  2. What Happened to the Romanov Family? - source related study

    Sources A and B are very similar in their accounts of what happened to the Romanov family. Source C is a source that covers many of the same aspects of the investigation as the first two sources, but it has drawn different conclusions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work