• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The 1905 revolution was no real threat to Tsardom

Extracts from this document...


The 1905 revolution was no real threat to Tsardom. For many hundreds of years Russia had been run by the Romanov dynasty. They had ruled over Russia with unlimited power sanctioned by arbitrary power which they believed that god had given to them. However in the early 20th century discontent started to grow. The tsar became inundated with calls for change and to end his and his family's autocratic rule. It can be said that revolution was in the air but many people have debated whether the 1905 revolution had any sort of impact towards the lessening of the tsar's powers. In this essay I will argue that some political advances were made towards democracy, however it will also argue that what did arise from the revolution and the following events ...read more.


The effect of the 1905 revolution was a psychological change in the people. It would pose a huge treat to the tsar. This was especially evident in the 1917 revolution because he could no longer rely on the support of his people or his army. With the new radical thoughts running through the peasants mind strikes and uprisings soon followed along with national revolts. All these events were exacerbated by the defeat of the Russian Armies in Manchuria, in May 1905. These put pressure on to the tsar to make change to the way in which he ran the country. He had to decide to either control the masses by creating a military dictator ship or to grant the sought after constitution. ...read more.


The Tsar allowed foreign publications to send their materials in to Russia and through the communication network, Lenin and other revolutionary ideas floated to the remotest of villages. Everybody now knew Lenin's socialist party and was suitably impressed by the works in "Pravda", their magazine. Therefore the effect that the 1905 revolution was suppressed by the changes that the tsar made after it. The people of Russia started to see changes in their society which would make their standard of living far greater. By the time of the October Manifesto, in 1905, the Tsar promised more political power in the hands of the people through a national duma. Because of these changes the tsar must have seen his power fading away as an inevitable 2nd revolution loomed up. ?? ?? ?? ?? - 1 - Russian Revolution By Alex Bennett ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Was the October Revolution inevitable

    Martov was not the typical Politian; he was upfront and honest and had specific morals and principles on the other hand Lenin was able to plot behind other's backs and was able to hide his true emotions in the political arena.

  2. Assess the idea that is the ideologies, which emerge from the French revolution, rather ...

    These people had other ideas, the revolutionaries wanted to abolish, what everyone now believed as the old order and ancient regime back in place. By the summer of 1791, the Constituent Assembly finalised the constitution. A lot of people were angered by this new document.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    Incidentally, the revolting slander that Lenin was a "German agent", which is, incredibly, still in circulation, is at complete variance with the facts. It was not Lenin but the Russian bourgeoisie that was pro-German and wanted to sell Russia to the enemy in 1917, as Lianozov's remarks show.

  2. Find out the real cause of the French Revolution

    passage described the town of Combourgh, which, according to Young, was filled with 'filth and poverty'. And here is another passage from the first hand document, describing the poverty of the lower social status: "The poor people seem poor indeed; the children terribly ragged - if possible, worse clad than

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    On the other hand, Medvedev could have been tortured by the Whites, because they wanted to know what happened when they were shot. This means that the source could be unreliable. It could also be unreliable because it does not agree to what his wife says in source E.

  2. What happened to the Romanov Family? Sourcework

    Making people feel content and secure in their own country is the most effective way of reducing the support for extreme measures such as communist revolutions. Source B is slightly more reliable in this respect, as the source is a high profile report, written by a British diplomat, intended for the government intelligence, as opposed to the public.

  1. Was the defeat in the war the real cause of the Russian Revolution

    He was jealous of his successor Stolypin and helped to weaken his position. Stolypin had almost the same views as Witte and also wanted industrialisation. He was a great nationalist and realised that the Duma had a role to play within Russia and went about his business by manipulating them

  2. What Happened to the Romanov Family? - source related study

    The information that the American reporter used was mainly from the Russian White investigator, Judge Sergeyev. The author of Source B, Sir Charles Elliot, also got the information form this extract of the report from Judge Sergeyev. And it is probable that he worked very closely with Judge Sergeyev through

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work