• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The actions of Nellie Hall alocal Birmingham Suffragette - source related study.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

William Pearson Assignment 2: 'The actions of Nellie Hall a local Birmingham Suffragette 2) Compare sources B and C. Which source seems to support the suffragettes and which seems to be hostile? Explain your answer carefully using quotes. Both sources B and c are taken from newspapers. Source b is a transcript from a local newspaper. This has several disadvantages; firstly mistakes could have been made when it was being copied and also sections of text have been missed out. They may have been irrelevant but they could of contained information that could have helped us answer the question. Source C is a direct extract from an article. It was taken from 'The daily Herald' a national newspaper, on Monday 29th June 1914, before the outbreak of war. ...read more.

Middle

The use of the word 'conspired' makes it sound worse than it really is, the most famous being the gunpowder plot. The other allegations, "loose, idle and disorderly persons" are very vague and are not really major offences. It just suggests that they are 'easy' women, maybe prostitutes who don't work for their men, 'working class'. The main offence was that they had conspired, the police had found during a raid, plans to bomb a house in Leicester, but the items that they actually collected were totally irrelevant to the allegations, such as a hammer and some fuse wire. The reporter uses specific language to describe the women and the scenes taking place in the courtroom. ...read more.

Conclusion

'Your enemies enemy, is your friend' The article describes the way the home secretary Mr McKenna, was trying to break down the women torturing them, this refers to the way that the women had been force fed by the prison officers. The writer likens it to the tortures crimes committed by the Czars in Russia. It suggests that they have no human rights what so ever. The writer uses language to try and get people to feel for the women, 'hideous brutality' is a prime example of the article bias towards the women. It then goes on to say that the people who are not campaigning for the women at this stage are with the government and for this terrible torture. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. The Somme - source related study.

    What both sources don't mention is the lack of intelligence the British had before their attack and also, how the small amount of intelligence they did have was used. Before the battle of the Somme, the British found a German dugout intact, after heavy fighting.

  2. Haig and 'The Battle of the Somme' - source related study.

    uncaring general as during the still one officer says 'Clearly Field Marshall Haig is about to make yet another giant effort to make his drinks cabinet six inches closer to Berlin,' suggesting Haig sits back while his men fought and died.

  1. Votes for women - source related questions.

    It depicts two women, one a suffragette, and one a suffragist outside a liberal meeting; the suffragette is holding a banner saying 'female suffrage' the suffragist is saying to the suffragette 'YOU help our cause? Why, you're its worst enemy!'

  2. South Africa - source related study

    They would not say that they had weapons they would rather say that is was the polices fault. They would rather blame someone else. And also it will show how bad the government are there, so they could get their point across on what they were protesting about.

  1. Votes For Women - Source related study.

    Written in 1925 but referring to the dramatic Suffragette attacks on churches and other public buildings of 1913, the Speaker of the House of Commons commented on the lack of sympathy for the women the House now had. He wrote that the "extravagant and lawless action of the militants hardened the opposition to their demands."

  2. Votes for women, c1900-28 - source related study.

    They both agree with the fact that violence is not the key to getting the vote and that Suffragettes were just making it harder for women to get the right to vote. On the other hand source B and source C do disagree with each other in some ways.

  1. 'Study Sources B and C. Does Source B support the evidence of Source C ...

    Source C the old lady, portrayed as a Suffragette, also has a discontented impression on her face, and the fact that she is old makes it more obvious that she is discontented, as when old ladies have reached their dotage, they tend to be more grumpy, unsatisfied, miserable and wicked, loosing their patience and the fragile, Angelic look about them.

  2. Haig and the Somme - source related study

    Though the nature of the source is to evoke national pride, the source gives a fair and positive description of the British forces; 'our enemies were well-prepared, greater in number and brave.' Also the source has no reason to encourage or animate people in a war situation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work