The Bolsheviks - Source related study.

Authors Avatar

Rexford Obeng 11DS                                                                                  7th   October 2003

History coursework

Question 4

Source H does not prove that Colonel Richard Meinertzhagen is lying because first of all in source H it says that some are dead and some on the train but it doesn’t say that they were rescued like source J said. The part where source H says that they were on the train,’ it was not a fact it was a rumour so that cannot be totally reliable. In source J can say that they have been rescued on purpose so that they can make the British feel better especially King George because the Tsar is his cousin. Also source H isn’t fully reliable because it also said that ‘ it is believed’ which shows that it isn’t a fact but source J is a diary written by a famous agent so it can be reliable. Also Elliot got his information from the whites and the whites aren’t 100% sure on what is happening so that can’t be reliable. Overall source H is not even strong enough to prove that Colonel Meinertzhagen was lying due to the lack of reliability.

Join now!

Source I was written after source J and it is more reliable because it was by an eyewitness and she says that she has seen four so that shows that source J was lying. Also in source J he said that he rescued one girl and if source I was written after and an eyewitness sees 4 daughters then source J must be false however she also said that the candle was poor and she could make out which shows that it isn’t that reliable so overall none of the sources can prove that Meinertzhagen is wrong.

After studying these sources ...

This is a preview of the whole essay