• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The events that occurred in Derryon 30th January 1972 became known as 'Bloody Sunday'. Why have these events produced such different historical interpretations?

Extracts from this document...


The events that occurred in Derry on 30th January 1972 became known as 'Bloody Sunday'. Why have these events produced such different historical interpretations? 'Bloody Sunday', as it became known, has produced many different interpretations of events. Since January 1972 people have recorded diverse versions of events depending on where they were or which faction of society they belonged to. The sources used for the purpose of this essay are all from the media. The first two are from news paper reports written 27 years after the event following new revelations made during the partial disclosure of evidence submitted to the inquiry lead by Lord Saville, commissioned by Tony Blair. Source (c) is taken from an ITN news report relating to the same inquiry some 14 months later (than the other sources) in November 2000. Source (a) is an extract from the 'Daily Mail', written by the deputy Political Editor. This newspaper is by tradition a conservative newspaper, so it portrays some more right wing ideas in its stories, and it has been known to support controversial issues like capital punishment. The paper is aimed the more middle class people. In this Northern Ireland case 'The Daily Mail' is Pro-Ulster, so this means that although being a news paper it should be neutral, that it does support the Protestants. ...read more.


Source (b) is an extract from the newspaper 'The Guardian'. This newspaper is slightly left wing, so it is slightly Labour in its views, but it is almost centre. So it is known for not supporting capital punishment. In this case, Northern Ireland, it does not agree with what the IRA was doing there but it still managed to show some sympathy towards the IRA. The 'Guardian' seemed to understand why these people were willing to go to such extremes. The 'Guardian' says that the people that were killed were innocent and defenceless, where as the 'Daily Mail' supported the paras. According to the Widgery report the paras were correct in opening fire on all of those people as they were found to have been holding firearms, but in this new report it has found that one of the victims was shot from about a metre away and then a further two times whilst he was on the floor. His lawyer said that this could merit a murder prosecution. Then another man who was killed was hit on the back of the head with a 'Dum-Dum', these fragment on impact and were made illegal under the Geneva Convention, therefore these soldiers had broken the law. ...read more.


How did he know that they were off duty soldiers, were they talking to him or to each other it does not tell us. He said that he heard that a couple of months before the event, but he spoke out in the year 2000, 28 years later. He could not have remembered ever single detail so what he said may not have actually been true. Things that are said like that might not always add up to make sense with an event that happens shortly after it is said. This source is another example of an interpretation of the events of bloody Sunday, but again this is just one of the many interpretations. In conclusion there was a lot of people at the event who have experienced different things, these have then been passed on to other people and may be been changed. From this there is not any way that the correct truth will come out. There are only three sources of so many, the sources I have, were not at the time of Bloody Sunday, and they were all almost 30 years after. Different stories come out for different reasons, for example the paras would say that they were fired upon so they returned fire, and other people will say that the army had planned to do this all the time. Gareth Clifford - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Free essay

    Which Of The Following Events Has Had The Biggest Impact On The History Of ...

    country being controlled by England therefore there was again a rise in violence. Also those ruling from Westminster couldn't possibly rule effectively because who can do what's right if they can't see what's wrong? The least Important has to be the dissolving of the B-specials, as this didn't have a

  2. Bloody Sunday - How useful are sources A,B,C and D to someone trying to ...

    Instead the English journalist seems to be backing up what the priest said in Source G. The only reason that this source is more credible than others is that it is being completely unbiased if anything the reporter is supporting the opposition.

  1. 'Bloody Sunday' 30 January 1972 - source related study.

    The way in which the Irishman has been drawn in this cartoon has a purpose to maybe get the views of a group of people across in a newspaper and therefore the audience would be to a wide range of people mainly the richer half of the English population as it is a political matter between the two countries.

  2. The events that occurred in Derry on 30 January 1972 became known as Bloody ...

    Source 12d is from The Guardian newspaper. The writer explicitly states that he did not see any weapons on the side of the IRA and therefore that the army were to blame for shootings. This may be one of the more objective accounts of the events provided by the selected

  1. The Four Events

    On the other hand, in the North it was very different the Ulster Protestants did not want a separate Ireland so they gave full support to the British. The short-term affects of this were that the Nationalists believed that Partition would be a temporary solution.

  2. Biran Friel, Making History, Historical Background

    Mountjoy rushed to contain the Spanish, while O'Neill and O'Donnell were compelled to hazard their armies in separate marches from the north, through territories defended by Sir George Carew, in the depths of a severe winter. At Bandon they joined together, and then blockaded the English army that was laying siege to the Spanish.

  1. The events that occurred on 30th January 1972 became known as "Bloody Sunday". Why ...

    That report, prepared by Lord Chief Justice Widgery left many questions and only infused the argument. Lord Saville was British however, questioning the reliability of the results. The witnesses accounts received were usually biased. Due to the chaos and confusion it was hard to decipher exactly what happened; in addition

  2. How far are the tensions in Northern Ireland due the events f 30th January ...

    Christian country today even if it is divided by Catholics and Protestants. In the 1500, the British and the King of England had little or no power outside of the small area around Dublin called the 'Pale'. The Country of Ireland was independent and was divided into small kingdoms.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work