The Romanov family - source related study.

Authors Avatar

Duncan Knipe

Source Coursework

  1. Study sources A and B.

Sources A and B give similar accounts.  Does this mean they are reliable?

Source A contains information on Sergeyev’s finding of the murder.  Sergeyev is an investigator who was present in Russia in 1918, therefore his findings are important.  Source B agrees totally with Source A, and normally this would make their information more reliable.  Although I know that they cannot be considered reliable together because Sir Charles Elliot got his information from Sergeyev.  The information in Source B is just repeating what Sergeyev says in Source A.  However, on their own they should still not be considered reliable, because they disagree with Source D, which is an eyewitness account.  They also disagree with Sokolov’s investigation in Source C.  And using my own knowledge I know that Sokolov’s investigation was closer to the truth, because in 1994 the corpses of all of the Tsar’s family was uncovered.  So to conclude, I believe that Sources A and B are not reliable because the information in both is from the same source, and Sergeyev’s findings were far from the truth.

  1. Study Sources A, B and C.

How far does the account in Source C differ from those in Sources A and B?

All three sources agree that the Tsar was murdered in the Ipatiev House.  Although C states that not only the Tsar was murdered, but the entire Romanov family as well.  A and B believe that the rest of the family left Ekaterinburg by train the same night.  Source A says that the murder was committed in the lower story of the building were the royal family lived, but C disagrees by saying that the murder was committed in the basement where the family didn’t live.  Source B states that no trace of the family being burnt was discovered, while Source C clearly states that the bodies were burnt.  It is obvious to see that there are far more differences than there are similarities.  So it is safe to say that Sources A and B give  a very un-similar account, if not completely opposite account to that of Source C.  

Join now!

  1. Study Sources D and E.

Source D must be reliable because it’s an eyewitness account.  Do you agree?

Although Source D is an eyewitness account, the Whites most likely tortured Medvedev so they could gain support from foreign governments.  Despite this, the description he gives of the event is in a lot of detail, possibly meaning he’s speaking the truth as he remembers it very well.  Looking at the sources content, what he says agrees with Source C.  This could ...

This is a preview of the whole essay