• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Soviet state was established at the expense of Soviet people - discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Linda Lapina Essay in history Word count: 2212 The Soviet state was established at the expense of Soviet people Russia has never been known as a humane country, or its governments, beginning with the tsars like Ivan the Harsh, as having much respect for human life. One or two millions' loss in the vast population has never been a cause of concern for the government. The policies through which the Soviet state was established under Stalin was not only the same as the ones had before- they were even crueler than the long-practised Russian governing traditions would predict. Therefore, I fully agree with the given statement. To prove this view, I will examine Stalin's policies chronologically- in agriculture and collectivisation, industrialisation, purges and labour camps, showing how they benefited the USSR at the expense of the people inhabiting it. One of the first signs that Stalin was ready to sacrifice a lot in order to bring Russia up to the same industrial level as the developed anti- communist Western countries, was industrialisation, started in 1927, when Stalin ordered Gosplan (State Planning Commission, established in 1921) to start on producing 5-year plans. New economic policy (NEP) had been abandoned before, and now Stalin made an emphasis on mechanisation to increase agricultural and industrial productivity. ...read more.

Middle

He declared in an official speech in 1929 that his intention was to "crash kulaks so that they would never rise again". Of course, this required drastic methods, which Stalin was truly fond of using. Kulaks were separated in three groups. Ones who were considered to be the most hostile to the regime were sent in exile to Siberia and other remote corners of the USSR to be placed in the labour camps or even executed; the wealthiest kulaks were transported to other regions, and the third group, said to be the least harmful to the regime, were assigned to remain where they lived, but on the worst land. The property of kulaks was confiscated. However, Stalin did not care about the vast expenses of removing so many people, even though the country was claimed to be in a lack of money. However, kulaks were not the only ones who suffered from collectivisation, nor the ones who suffered most. The peasants, especially in some regions of the country, were strongly opposed to collectivisation. Some left the countryside and moved to the cities to work in the factories, where they had to face lack of space and bad working conditions, and be fast with learning jobs that they had no skills for. ...read more.

Conclusion

It is also notable that the slave labour at the camps was more efficient to the government- prisoners did not have to be paid, motivated or given social guarantees, and it was not found necessary to secure them with proper food, machinery or living quarters. On the whole it can easily be inferred that Stalin really did build the Soviet state and economy at the expense of the Soviet people. There might be different interpretations of whether these policies were justifiable or not. Some might state that, as Stalin said it himself, USSR was lagging behind the more developed Western economies and it was necessary to catch up fast or the USSR really might be "crushed". But this is a matter mostly depending on the judger's ethical norms. However, to me deaths of millions of people, which were the results of USSR's economical policy, are not acceptable at any money cost. Famine, slave labour, terrible conditions of the people could be avoided by taking more moderate measures and more time to develop the economy. Besides, as it could be seen in the case with Great Terror, Stalin was not that much concerned about growth and development of USSR as he was about obtaining and preserving his own unlimited power. Fulfilment of one man's personal interests was what caused death casualties of millions, and one must have strange moral norms to find this policy morally acceptable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    Stalin's use of terror played a major role to make sure workers did what was asked of them. Stalin created a new constitution for the USSR, which gave freedom of speech and free elections to the Russian people. However, only the Communist party candidates were allowed to stand in elections, and only approved newspapers and magazines could be published.

  2. To what extent was Stalin's economic policy successful? In the 1920's the soviet economy ...

    unskilled worker in Magnitogorsk was something in the neighbourhood of 100 roubles, a skilled workers' apprentice 200, a skilled worker, 300; an engineer with experience 600 to 800; administrators, directors etc., anywhere from 800 to 3000. The heavy differentiation....." J.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    This is exactly what happened as by the end of the second Five Year Plans in 1937, Russia came out as a powerful and modern state which matched the industrial forces of Western countries. She no longer dreaded an incursion by them and it was the mixture of this fresh

  2. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    How far do these sources show this to be true? In the Soviet Union, during 1928 - 1953, Stalin had absolute control over everything. He was a talented politician who eventually reached and maintained his position of "Supreme Ruler". He was the most powerful dictators in the 20th Century.

  1. To what extent were the sufferings of the Soviet people in the 1930s a ...

    Collectivisation seemed to have failed. Wiping out the kulaks was a bad idea as they were the most successful farmers, who knew new techniques. This could have benefited Stalin's collective farms, and helped modernise Russia's agriculture. Also the famine caused by Stalin left many dead.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    All the basic human needs would be satisfied by such a planned world economy. As a consequence, classes would dissolve into society, together with the last vestiges of class society - money and the state. This would give rise to genuine communism and the replacement of the domination of man

  1. Russia 1905-1945 Stalin - man or monster - source based questions

    Communism.�� We know that the executions were something it was badly done. The purges and the show trials are a good evidence of Stalin�s needs to use terror to control Russia, it was his very method he used against the people.

  2. How far by 1941, had the Soviet economy benefited from changes in agricultural policy ...

    agricultural policy as it is true that peasant women were becoming more sophisticated and at the start of collectivisation grain deliveries to the state did gradually start to rise. One of the main benefits that the soviet economy benefited from was ?rapid industrialisation? All of the sources talk about this

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work