• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do Sources C, G, I and J give a full/accurate picture of life in Stalingrad during the battle?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do Sources C, G, I and J give a full/accurate picture of life in Stalingrad during the battle? Source C is an official, military style report. It appears to be quite accurate as it talks about the 'destruction of the encircled group of enemy forces' and we know for a fact that the encirclement and destruction of the 6th army did actually happen. Lt Gen Rokossovski, a Russian Commander, was the person writing the source and as his name is on it, it makes it quite reliable. There is also a date and a time, Feb. 2nd 1943 4 pm which adds to the reliability. This Russian Commander was there first hand to witness what went on and is most likely writing to his Russian superiors because of the official military style and in his report. He doesn't mention anything about casualties and he is very boastful. This makes it seem like his troops are totally on top of things and the Russians are easily in control of the war. It's also very detailed as it states 'Twenty-two divisions have been destroyed or taken prisoner.' ...read more.

Middle

It also only shows one place at one time, so when all these things have been taken into account it's very hard to say that this picture gives a full or accurate picture of what life would have been like during the Battle of Stalingrad. Source I stresses the importance of propaganda. It tells us how leaflets were dropped into trenches or cellars and theses were sometimes the only way it was possible to find out political information, some of the more important events happening on the front or about military activity in their neighbourhood. This Source gives us a slight insight into the conditions that the troops were facing in the trenches, dugouts and cellars in Stalingrad but as it's a propagandists' report he tells us more about methods and ways they used propaganda rather than the actual conditions that faced the troops in battle. The Russian propagandist, Pavel Ivanovich Doronin, who wrote the report, only focuses on how the Russians were doing and he only gives us his perspective. This makes the report a little less reliable as he may make things up but as he is running from trench to trench giving out information, we ...read more.

Conclusion

The tone that it is written in isn't a very official tone. It's written as if for a friend or colleague and may be meant to generate sympathy whereas if it had been official it would have had a lot more fact in it and a lot less opinion. There also isn't any recorded date on it or purpose for writing it and no mention of Russians or civilians so all in all this Source is quite an unreliable source and doesn't give us a full picture of life during the Battle of Stalingrad. In conclusion these four sources alone do give us some useful information but ultimately are not enough to paint a full/accurate picture. Sources C and I are both written by Russians, J is written by a German and it's not possible to decide who took the photo in Source G. So in each of these reports the writer is going to be more biased towards his side. A civilians report would be the most reliable because they would see the full picture as they would know through propaganda, newspapers etc what was happening in different areas and this would probably be a fuller more honest report of life in Stalingrad during the battle. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    This idea can be shown in source I. Stalin then turned his attention to the army, particularly the officers. As the purges were extended, university lecturers and teachers, miners and engineers, factory managers and ordinary workers all disappeared. It was said that every family in the USSR were touched by the purges.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    the Cultural Revolution set us back twenty years" Millions of students were sent to the countryside to work on the land - thus preventing the reemergence of the Red Guards. So chaotic was the situation that universities did not reopen until 1970.

  1. What happened to the Romanov Family? - Sources A and B give similar accounts. ...

    In particular, source J greatly contradicts the evidence given in sources A and B. Source J affirms that the Tsarina and three of the royal daughters were found at the burial site implying that they were killed with the Tsar, unless for some reason they were killed at a different

  2. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    the Tsars' murder - Judge Sokolov, claims, "the entire Romanov family had been massacred" which is backed up by Sources D which describes, "all the members of the Tsar's family lying on the floor. The corpses were taken out to the lorry."

  1. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answer with ...

    He used this story to make him look good and the old leaders look like tyrants. In the passage, Stalin shows deep concern for the drowned man who was left back by his 'comrades'. Stalin uses the story to say that the lack of concern these men had was like

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    This was the function of the October Revolution. The calling of elections to the Constituent Assembly the following year was almost in the nature of an afterthought. The Bolsheviks intended to use this to try to mobilise the majority of the peasantry and rouse them to political life.

  1. Study Sources A, B and C. Do these sources give similar or different ...

    Stalin also made education compulsory and free for all. However the source does not show the negative side of Stalin�s industrialization. Life was very hard, factory conditions were very dangerous. Any kind of discipline problems such as lateness or absence would be punished with sacking, which could also mean the loss of homes.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    It shows a positive view of him. It shows him with other workers overlooking a newly opened hydro-electric power station. The painting depicts a joyful mood with Stalin and his co-workers seemingly pleased with their construction. The mood also seems relaxed and informal. The picture portrays Stalin as a friendly man that cares about workers and his

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work