• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do Sources C, G, I and J give a full/accurate picture of life in Stalingrad during the battle?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do Sources C, G, I and J give a full/accurate picture of life in Stalingrad during the battle? Source C is an official, military style report. It appears to be quite accurate as it talks about the 'destruction of the encircled group of enemy forces' and we know for a fact that the encirclement and destruction of the 6th army did actually happen. Lt Gen Rokossovski, a Russian Commander, was the person writing the source and as his name is on it, it makes it quite reliable. There is also a date and a time, Feb. 2nd 1943 4 pm which adds to the reliability. This Russian Commander was there first hand to witness what went on and is most likely writing to his Russian superiors because of the official military style and in his report. He doesn't mention anything about casualties and he is very boastful. This makes it seem like his troops are totally on top of things and the Russians are easily in control of the war. It's also very detailed as it states 'Twenty-two divisions have been destroyed or taken prisoner.' ...read more.

Middle

It also only shows one place at one time, so when all these things have been taken into account it's very hard to say that this picture gives a full or accurate picture of what life would have been like during the Battle of Stalingrad. Source I stresses the importance of propaganda. It tells us how leaflets were dropped into trenches or cellars and theses were sometimes the only way it was possible to find out political information, some of the more important events happening on the front or about military activity in their neighbourhood. This Source gives us a slight insight into the conditions that the troops were facing in the trenches, dugouts and cellars in Stalingrad but as it's a propagandists' report he tells us more about methods and ways they used propaganda rather than the actual conditions that faced the troops in battle. The Russian propagandist, Pavel Ivanovich Doronin, who wrote the report, only focuses on how the Russians were doing and he only gives us his perspective. This makes the report a little less reliable as he may make things up but as he is running from trench to trench giving out information, we ...read more.

Conclusion

The tone that it is written in isn't a very official tone. It's written as if for a friend or colleague and may be meant to generate sympathy whereas if it had been official it would have had a lot more fact in it and a lot less opinion. There also isn't any recorded date on it or purpose for writing it and no mention of Russians or civilians so all in all this Source is quite an unreliable source and doesn't give us a full picture of life during the Battle of Stalingrad. In conclusion these four sources alone do give us some useful information but ultimately are not enough to paint a full/accurate picture. Sources C and I are both written by Russians, J is written by a German and it's not possible to decide who took the photo in Source G. So in each of these reports the writer is going to be more biased towards his side. A civilians report would be the most reliable because they would see the full picture as they would know through propaganda, newspapers etc what was happening in different areas and this would probably be a fuller more honest report of life in Stalingrad during the battle. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    Khrushchev would definitely know what he was talking about as he worked very closely with Stalin. Khrushchev became leader of Russia after Stalin. He could've been saying these things about Stalin to make clear that he wasn't like this so he would win over whoever he was talking to.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Deng was famed for saying 'It does not matter whether a cat is black or white as long as it catches mice'. This was a reference to state-control verses free market economics. Deng was convinced that the test of theory was practice (a sentiment frequently arising in Mao's writings), and

  1. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answer with ...

    In this extract from his speech, Khrushchev defends Stalin. We also have to take in consideration that Khrushchev would not have wanted to disrespect Stalin in anyway because the speech was given to Stalin's former party, of which Khrushchev was now in charge, and he knew that the Soviet communist party looked up to Stalin even though he was gone.

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    This Stalin might want to achieve in order so people will be good and not rebellious and cause problems in the country Maybe not as important but the source also provides some useful evidence on Stalin and his background. We can learn from the source that Stalin is was in

  1. What happened to the Romanov Family? - Sources A and B give similar accounts. ...

    However the fact that source B was a report to the British government and was not necessarily going to be published makes it seem more likely that sir Charles Elliot would have presented what he thought actually happened to the Romanov family as accurately as he could, since Britain's government

  2. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    Likewise, comparing Sources A and B to Source I, we are again confirmed that not all of the members of the Tsar's family were killed as it suggests, "decided to execute, by shooting, Nikolas Romanov. His wife and son have been sent off to a secure place".

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    According to this, the Bolsheviks before the revolution had advocated a democratically elected parliament (Constituent Assembly), yet after the revolution they disbanded it. Since they were in a minority, the argument goes, they decided to dissolve the democratically elected parliament and resort to dictatorship.

  2. Study Sources A, B and C. Do these sources give similar or different ...

    Stalin also made education compulsory and free for all. However the source does not show the negative side of Stalin�s industrialization. Life was very hard, factory conditions were very dangerous. Any kind of discipline problems such as lateness or absence would be punished with sacking, which could also mean the loss of homes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work