• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do Sources C, G, I and J give a full/accurate picture of life in Stalingrad during the battle?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do Sources C, G, I and J give a full/accurate picture of life in Stalingrad during the battle? Source C is an official, military style report. It appears to be quite accurate as it talks about the 'destruction of the encircled group of enemy forces' and we know for a fact that the encirclement and destruction of the 6th army did actually happen. Lt Gen Rokossovski, a Russian Commander, was the person writing the source and as his name is on it, it makes it quite reliable. There is also a date and a time, Feb. 2nd 1943 4 pm which adds to the reliability. This Russian Commander was there first hand to witness what went on and is most likely writing to his Russian superiors because of the official military style and in his report. He doesn't mention anything about casualties and he is very boastful. This makes it seem like his troops are totally on top of things and the Russians are easily in control of the war. It's also very detailed as it states 'Twenty-two divisions have been destroyed or taken prisoner.' ...read more.

Middle

It also only shows one place at one time, so when all these things have been taken into account it's very hard to say that this picture gives a full or accurate picture of what life would have been like during the Battle of Stalingrad. Source I stresses the importance of propaganda. It tells us how leaflets were dropped into trenches or cellars and theses were sometimes the only way it was possible to find out political information, some of the more important events happening on the front or about military activity in their neighbourhood. This Source gives us a slight insight into the conditions that the troops were facing in the trenches, dugouts and cellars in Stalingrad but as it's a propagandists' report he tells us more about methods and ways they used propaganda rather than the actual conditions that faced the troops in battle. The Russian propagandist, Pavel Ivanovich Doronin, who wrote the report, only focuses on how the Russians were doing and he only gives us his perspective. This makes the report a little less reliable as he may make things up but as he is running from trench to trench giving out information, we ...read more.

Conclusion

The tone that it is written in isn't a very official tone. It's written as if for a friend or colleague and may be meant to generate sympathy whereas if it had been official it would have had a lot more fact in it and a lot less opinion. There also isn't any recorded date on it or purpose for writing it and no mention of Russians or civilians so all in all this Source is quite an unreliable source and doesn't give us a full picture of life during the Battle of Stalingrad. In conclusion these four sources alone do give us some useful information but ultimately are not enough to paint a full/accurate picture. Sources C and I are both written by Russians, J is written by a German and it's not possible to decide who took the photo in Source G. So in each of these reports the writer is going to be more biased towards his side. A civilians report would be the most reliable because they would see the full picture as they would know through propaganda, newspapers etc what was happening in different areas and this would probably be a fuller more honest report of life in Stalingrad during the battle. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    The source could be suggesting that Stalin was ill. "This suspicion created in him a general distrust", it's not proving him to be evil, just stating what Stalin thinks and how his brain works. The source does not give us much information. We know that this speech was written after Stalin died, but we do not know who it was to.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    and how he reveals that Stalin's most important aim was to keep Communism thriving in Russia and the most important of all, to protect himself. Krushchev's proof that Stalin was paranoid can be seen in source H. Krushchev portrays a more negative view of Stalin and says how Stalin acted "suspicious" and how he was very "distrustful".

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Indeed, while the 'Tiger Economies' of South East Asia have cracked, notably Thailand, South Korea, Indonesia and Malaysia, Hong Kong has retained a stable currency, although the value of the stock market has slumped. And while the economic giant of the region, Japan, seems to be on the brink of

  2. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    towards the Bolscheviks would also have forced him to exaggerate his findings in the favour of the Whites and hence against the Reds. For that reason, it can be inferred that the biasness of the source exceeds its reliability and trustworthiness.

  1. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    As well as being paranoid, the source provides evidence as to the fact that Stalin was as well a manipulative man. Through telling what may seem as a simple story he is trying to get the ordinary average people to think he is a nice man, as he cares for

  2. What happened to the Romanov Family? - Sources A and B give similar accounts. ...

    However the fact that source B was a report to the British government and was not necessarily going to be published makes it seem more likely that sir Charles Elliot would have presented what he thought actually happened to the Romanov family as accurately as he could, since Britain's government

  1. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answer with ...

    In conclusion, the sources express different views and neither of them are one hundred percent reliable. Sources B and C do share some similarities. These sources show the different views of the people. Some idolized him whilst others thought he was an evil dictator.

  2. Study Sources A, B and C. Do these sources give similar or different ...

    Stalin also made education compulsory and free for all. However the source does not show the negative side of Stalin�s industrialization. Life was very hard, factory conditions were very dangerous. Any kind of discipline problems such as lateness or absence would be punished with sacking, which could also mean the loss of homes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work