• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do Sources C, G, I and J give a full/accurate picture of life in Stalingrad during the battle?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do Sources C, G, I and J give a full/accurate picture of life in Stalingrad during the battle? Source C is an official, military style report. It appears to be quite accurate as it talks about the 'destruction of the encircled group of enemy forces' and we know for a fact that the encirclement and destruction of the 6th army did actually happen. Lt Gen Rokossovski, a Russian Commander, was the person writing the source and as his name is on it, it makes it quite reliable. There is also a date and a time, Feb. 2nd 1943 4 pm which adds to the reliability. This Russian Commander was there first hand to witness what went on and is most likely writing to his Russian superiors because of the official military style and in his report. He doesn't mention anything about casualties and he is very boastful. This makes it seem like his troops are totally on top of things and the Russians are easily in control of the war. It's also very detailed as it states 'Twenty-two divisions have been destroyed or taken prisoner.' ...read more.

Middle

It also only shows one place at one time, so when all these things have been taken into account it's very hard to say that this picture gives a full or accurate picture of what life would have been like during the Battle of Stalingrad. Source I stresses the importance of propaganda. It tells us how leaflets were dropped into trenches or cellars and theses were sometimes the only way it was possible to find out political information, some of the more important events happening on the front or about military activity in their neighbourhood. This Source gives us a slight insight into the conditions that the troops were facing in the trenches, dugouts and cellars in Stalingrad but as it's a propagandists' report he tells us more about methods and ways they used propaganda rather than the actual conditions that faced the troops in battle. The Russian propagandist, Pavel Ivanovich Doronin, who wrote the report, only focuses on how the Russians were doing and he only gives us his perspective. This makes the report a little less reliable as he may make things up but as he is running from trench to trench giving out information, we ...read more.

Conclusion

The tone that it is written in isn't a very official tone. It's written as if for a friend or colleague and may be meant to generate sympathy whereas if it had been official it would have had a lot more fact in it and a lot less opinion. There also isn't any recorded date on it or purpose for writing it and no mention of Russians or civilians so all in all this Source is quite an unreliable source and doesn't give us a full picture of life during the Battle of Stalingrad. In conclusion these four sources alone do give us some useful information but ultimately are not enough to paint a full/accurate picture. Sources C and I are both written by Russians, J is written by a German and it's not possible to decide who took the photo in Source G. So in each of these reports the writer is going to be more biased towards his side. A civilians report would be the most reliable because they would see the full picture as they would know through propaganda, newspapers etc what was happening in different areas and this would probably be a fuller more honest report of life in Stalingrad during the battle. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    He was one of the only people Stalin trusted. I wouldn't say this source states Stalin was a complete monster but it leans more towards the monster category. Sources G and H are quite hard to analyse because they are both said by the same person but sort of contradict each other so they are not very reliable sources.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    The immediate response one may have towards this speech is that Krushchev is attacking Stalin and his policies, however there is another interpretation that Krushchev did agree with some of Stalin's policies by later explaining in his speech how Stalin perceived his deeds to be in the best interests of his party and his mass plethora of supporters.

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Mounting economic success was mirrored in political advances, with agreements being reached with both the United Kingdom and Portugal for the return of Hong Kong and Macau to Chinese Sovereignty in 1997 and 1999 respectively. The dates for drawing lines under European intervention in China and its legacy were timetabled.

  2. What happened to the Romanov Family? - Sources A and B give similar accounts. ...

    could easily have had the information presented in his report never published if it was seen to damage their cause against the Bolsheviks. This could make source B more reliable, and as such source A would also seem more reliable since the information it presents is very similar to that which is presented in source B.

  1. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    Therefore as Sources A and B agree with the majority of the other sources they can be considered reliable to some extent. On the other hand, the minutiae in sources A and B also disagree with other sources in various ways.

  2. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answer with ...

    Study source D. Does this source provide any useful evidence about Stalin? Explain your answer. Source D is an account written by Stalin in 1945. This article will surely give a good representation of how Stalin portrayed himself within the USSR in 1945.

  1. Study Sources A, B and C. Do these sources give similar or different ...

    Stalin also made education compulsory and free for all. However the source does not show the negative side of Stalin�s industrialization. Life was very hard, factory conditions were very dangerous. Any kind of discipline problems such as lateness or absence would be punished with sacking, which could also mean the loss of homes.

  2. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin?

    Stalin also made education compulsory and free for all. However the source does not show the negative side of Stalin�s industrialization. Life was very hard, factory conditions were very dangerous. Any kind of discipline problems such as lateness or absence would be punished with sacking, which could also mean the loss of homes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work