• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the February 1917 Russian revolution inevitable after the 1905 revolution?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was the February 1917 revolution inevitable after the 1905 revolution? The February 1917 Revolution was one of the defining moments in Russian history, it was the culmination of years of class struggle and the forming of new ideals. The February Revolution was genuinely perceived as the start of a new Russia, this hope was in marked contrast to the subdued elevation of the results of the 1905 Revolution, which were seen as considerably watered-down in comparison to original expectations. The 1905 Revolution was, in essence, an economic revolution; those who marched on Bloody Sunday wanted better working conditions, not the end of Romanov Rule. It was just 12 years later that the mood had changed completely, from wanting better conditions to a concerted effort to rid Russia of an autocracy obsessed with self-preservation. Arguably, the 1905 Revolution added to the thirst for change, however it was other factors also which lead to a Revolution, which was always inevitable because those within the revolution had always sought a system without Tsarist rule. ...read more.


The major cause for frustration was the Duma, which had originally promised so much but was in the end just a rubber stamp for the Tsar. The people had revolted in 1905 for economic reasons but with the emergence of more radical socialists and more freedom of the press the people were able to make the real link between political incompetence and the economic hardships they faced. The 1905 Revolution provided the basis for change; the Tsar could have taken the opportunity to grant the people a representative assembly, it was however in his nature to preserve the autocracy, the change occurred in the people, they no longer wanted to live under a man described as 'not fit to run a village post office', the people forced the agenda and forced the revolution. The February 1917 Revolution did not happen because of a single event like the 1905 Revolution, the cumulative effect of years of neglect of its people, decades of poor economic policy and a willing to enter into conflicts in which it had no real interest brought about the destruction of the Tsardom. ...read more.


The war was a particularly major factor in the emergence of the revolution and its leaders, obviously socialists were dead against the war but at first a wave of nationalism swept the country as the first months went well for Russia. However, as the war dragged on the people of St. Petersburg, in particular, felt the full affects of food shortages, the victories dried up as well as the Russian army had equipment shortages and desertion was rife. The systematic neglect of its peoples and the apparent inability to take the countries needs into account ensured that the Revolution was close at hand. The February 1917 Revolution gave a platform for the Russian people to have a government in which their views were respected. The 1905 revolution obviously was a factor in the inaction of a revolution in February 1917 but the inevitability of the event can really be seen at the continuation of a Total War, which drained the Russian people and their tolerance for a government, which showed no respect for its peoples. Martin Fox 24/02/03 AKM ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    In his response Nicholas tells us how he decided to ignore the information given to him by Rodzianko. Which, I think if he had taken notice of he still could have saved his position. So this again backs up the claim that Nicholas could do nothing to control the workers, as he didn't believe what was taking place.

  2. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    Railway workers refused to let his train into the city. In the train, on 15 March, the Tsar finally made his mind to abdicate. However, he still did not get the idea of no royal family ruling and decided to abdicate in favour of his brother Michael.

  1. To what extent were economic problems the main cause of the 1905 revolution?

    This caused price rises on food and vital things in the city to pay for war costs and to compensate for the growing food shortage. People found themselves very frustrated and going hungry. More humiliation rose when the Japanese inflicted defeat on the Russians and as the war carried on Russia was getting deeper and deeper into trouble.

  2. How and why was Nicholas able to survive the 1905 revolution?

    approval". Thus meaning that the powers that the Liberals thought they had gained through the granting of a Duma were no more gained now than they were before October 1905. Another factor that influenced Nicholas's survival was the notable lack of involvement from the revolutionary groups that had formed prior to 1905 such as the SR's, Bolsheviks, and Menskeviks.

  1. Why was Nicholas II able to survive the 1905 revolution but was forced to ...

    In 1905, there had been a small number of mutinies but the Tsar still controlled the majority of the Army and Navy. Though the masses of protestors had seemed overwhelming, the combination of concessions and brutal use of armed forces, especially from the Cossacks, quickly subdued those on the streets.

  2. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    Rasputin was highly liked by the Tsar and Tsarina because he had found a way to cure their dying son. He also had a seductive and dominating influence over the Tsarina. Some Russians thought that the Tsarina was being controlled by Rasputin.

  1. 1917 Russian Revolution Perspective

    They have promised us better lives now! In the present! Not in the near future as the Provisional Government always did. And already I have seen good change. My satanic bosses who made my life a living hell are now gone and my factory is controlled by the state for the state.

  2. Was the October Revolution inevitable

    Their had been considerable support (around 80,000 picketers) for this movement lead by George Gapon who witness the massacre that ensued at the hands of the Tsar and wrote 'a new chapter was opened in the book of history of our people' which signalled the 1905 revolution.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work