• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the League of Nations successful in the 1920s?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐To what extent was the League of Nations successful in the 1920s? The League of Nations was first created in 1919 after the end of World War 1 with the sole purpose of preventing any future wars. It was set up as an international police force to try and keep the peace around the world by preventing conflicts and encouraging countries to co-operate. The Leagues main aims were: To discourage aggression from any nation, To encourage countries to co-operate, especially in Business and trade, To encourage nations to disarm and To improve the living and working conditions for everybody in all parts of the world. But how successful was the League of Nations in comparison to these aims? The main aim of the League was to discourage aggression form any nation in the hope of preventing any further wars by keeping the world a peaceful place. An example of the League trying to achieve this was the Aaland Islands in 1921. Both Sweden and Finland wanted control of the Aaland Islands which were in between the countries. ...read more.

Middle

It also shows that the countries in the League didn?t care much about the Leagues actions and clearly put alliances above it. I think the League succeeded more than they failed in discouraging aggression from any nations because although not every border dispute was solved, the majority were and the world became a safer place as a result. Another aim of the League was to ?Improve the living and working conditions for everybody in all parts of the world?. The League worked with the ILO (International Labour Organisation) to try to create a better world. They successfully limited the hours that small children were allowed to work and introduced a 48 hour week and 8 hour day. They also banned some poisonous substances from paint to help safeguard workers health?s and prevent permanent damage. However although all of the work they did to improve the conditions was very good, not all members chose to follow and adopt these rules as they believed it would increase costs. I think that overall the LON did achieve this goal as they did improve the conditions, just not in all countries. ...read more.

Conclusion

This was a border dispute between Germany and Poland over an industrial region that was rich in iron and steel. Both countries wanted it and eventually the League sent French and British troops to keep order. In 1920 a plebiscite was organised for Silesians to vote on which country they wanted to join. The industrial areas mainly voted for Germany, the rural areas mainly for Poland. The league then divided the region fairly and set up rail links between the two countries with water and power supplies. Both countries accepted the decision. This shows how the LOB helped to bring countries together peacefully to o-operate, I think the LON achieved this aim very well as there were no issues with the final outcome. In conclusion I think that the LON was relatively successful in the 1920s because they definitely met some of their aims such as improving the working conditions for everybody around the world and Encouraging countries to co-operate. However not all the border disputes were handled particularly well and in some the League did nothing. I therefore think that the LON could have been more successful if America had joined or if the countries in the league were more committed to it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920's?

    The Bulgarians appealed to the league for help. The league condemned the Greek action and ordered it to pull out and pay compensation to Bulgaria. Faced with this moral condemnation, it yielded. This shows how the league's strategy of moral condemnation was working successfully.

  2. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s.

    The French did not send their armies to stop Poland as they could see them as a useful ally against Germany. The British did not send troops either, as they did not want to act alone. In the end the league did nothing and Poland was able to keep Vilna.

  1. Evacuation of Children

    This was to avoid children being killed as a result of bombing that the British expected. In this essay I will evaluate Sources, comparing them, and agreeing or disagreeing with the statement "Evacuation was a great success". Source A is from a textbook, a secondary source written in 1988 for students.

  2. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s

    Both countries again agreed. 3. Bulgaria and Greece were fighting over land and Greece invaded Bulgaria. The Bulgarians were very peaceful and waited for the League to act. The League ordered the Greeks to pull out, they did and a large scale war was avoided.

  1. To what extent was there stability in Europe in the 1920's

    * Germany accepted that the Rhineland would remain a demilitarized zone. * France and Germany agreed to settle any future disputes through the League of Nations. The Locarno agreements were greeted with terrific enthusiasm and celebrated. The agreements led to Germany to join the League of Nations in 1926.

  2. ATHENS & THE DELIAN LEAGUE

    Thucydides describes these events, which occurred at the same time as the revolt of Thasos - ' Spartans, without informing the Athenians of their intentions, promised to [assist the Thasians] and would have done so if they had not been prevented by the earthquake...and by the simultaneous revolt...of the helots'.

  1. How well did the League of Nations keep the peace in the 1920's?

    But often warnings meant nothing, and countries were unwilling to stop trading with the aggressor because it would harm their country just as much. The League did not have its own army to declare war and countries were unwilling to use their troops if it wasn't in their self interest.

  2. Was the League of Nations a Success in the 1920's?

    Britain did not disarm because they needed their navy. So Britain did not sign the Treaty of Guarantee. As for America they did not disarm because they were not in the League of Nations. There was some concern though with avoiding conflict in the Far East so the League of Nations made up some treaties.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work