• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent were economic problems the main cause of the 1905 revolution?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent were economic problems the main cause of the 1905 revolution? The 1905 revolution was the biggest political change in Russian history for hundreds of years. It occurred when Tsar Nicolas the 2nd was forced to break his autocratic regime and publish the October manifesto. There were 3 main causes to why the revolution happened. They were bloody Sunday, a massacre of hundreds of peaceful protesters, The Russio-Japenese war, a war in which brought humiliation towards the army, and finally the economic problems which crippled the government for many years. The economic state of Russia around 1905 was very poor. It was a high priority for the Tsar to develop Russia's economy and industrialise the country to try and compete with the western countries. Around this time the living and working conditions of the country in general was at a poor standard, this was about to be made worse as the government decided to heavily raise taxes on everyday items like grain and alcohol. They used this extra money to invest in the industrialisation of the country as they thought that it would bring prosperity to Russia in the long term. The people did not like this idea and began to question the tsar's policies. ...read more.

Middle

This angered the public even more and they began to protest to stop the war. This could not have gone any worse for the tsar at the moment, his extremely poor judgement was beginning to cost people lives due to starvation. This is also an important factor to the 1905 revolution starting as it backed up why they wanted a government in the first place, to stop poor decisions being made by one man. Bloody Sunday was seen as the main spark to the 1905 revolution, it began in January 1905 when tensions in st. Petersburg were very high. A priest, Father Gapon posted a petition to ask the Tsar for help with the poor conditions in St. Petersburg. In the petition his main point was to ask for freedom of speech, an 8 hour working day and an elected assembly. Many working class people signed the petition and offered to protest outside the Tsars palace in St. Petersburg. On Sunday the 22nd of January 150,000 people marched towards the Ice Palace in St Petersburg to protest peacefully. As they arrived the people were met by many Cossack soldiers, rifles began to start firing and many people died including women and children, the Cossacks thought they were a revolutionary group out of control. ...read more.

Conclusion

This promised mass change for the Russians, it promised a parliament (Duma) to be elected by the people, he also promised civil rights, uncensored newspapers and freedom of speech. The liberals and middle classes thought they had won the 10 month battle against the Tsar for change. Out of the three main causes, economical was a very important one as it was the first and the starter to a possible revolution. Despite this, I do not think it is the main cause of the revolution, I think this because even though it was not important it did not start the revolution. I think that the problems that were a result of trying to industrialise a nation too quickly and inefficiently were not big enough to start a revolution on its own, I think with out the other two causes there wouldn't have been a revolution. Without economic problems you wouldn't have given the public the idea of needing a change of government structure. Without the problems from the Russio-Japenese war there wouldn't have been the beginning of protests and violence from the people and a common programme within the people set up. Finally without the Bloody Sunday affair there would be no spark to set off the revolution and therefore be no revolution. So judging from that I do not think there is one main point I think there are 3 points that combine to cause the Russian revolution in 1905. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. "To what extent was World War One the main reason for the downfall of ...

    city, he may have returned home to try and deal with the situation, improving his reputation. The traditional monarchists and ministers in the Duma were some of the most critical of the government, especially as their powers became suppressed by the government.

  2. Stalin man or monster

    However this deception in Stalin grew to a point that he was surrounded by paranoia that other people are deceiving him and also wanted power. Stalin could have got this view from that he was unliked by the majority of high ranked communist people and there is a possibility that Kirov was murdered.

  1. Was the October Revolution inevitable

    The second the peasants were interested in land not socialism and thirdly there was no political or civil freedom in Russia. Nevertheless two key supports of Marxism were to form the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party in 1898 Martov and Lenin both held similar views with a key distinction.

  2. Was the Russian government policy towards the peasants and the workers in Russia from ...

    They could use land in exchange for labour service or "obrok" (rent). But this statute failed to be effective. Nicholas I's policy towards the State peasants was a bit different from that of the ordinary serfs because the impoverishment of the former meant a weakening of the state in turn.

  1. To what extent was Stalin's economic policy successful? In the 1920's the soviet economy ...

    Even though grain production is up livestock in the USSR had disastrously fallen to fractions of the 1928 level. These show that collectivisation had caused havoc and ravaged the soviet country side and caused chaos. Even if collectivisation was aimed at grain solely the figures do not support success there

  2. How successful were Stalin's economic policies in the 1920s and 30s?

    In order for Stalin to make significant changes in industry he needed a lot more workers in his cities. By collectivisation Stalin made more food and because the farms now state controlled more of that food was available to the workers in the cities at a faster rate and for much cheaper than before.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    By the autumn of 1917, the old right SR leaders had lost their base among the soldiers, who went over in droves to the left SRs and their Bolshevik allies. The elections to the Constituent Assembly were organised in a hurry after the revolution on the basis of electoral lists drawn up before October.

  2. To what extent was the First World War a cause of the Russian Revolution?

    village of Grushevka had lost 13% of its population - it was hard to do so. With food shortages everywhere in Russia, and the government forced to spend more money than it took in taxes, creating inflation, industrialisation hit an all time low.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work