• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent were Stalins economic policies successful?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent were Stalin's economic policies successful? After Lenin's death in January 1924 there was a struggle for power within the Bolshevik party as Lenin did not specify a new leader. This left a lot of people wanting to become leader but after a struggle Stalin became undisputed ruler in 1928. Soon after this he introduced his economic policies but in order to determine how successful these policies were we have to take in to account the reasons Stalin embarked on his economic policies, the targets of the policies, what he did to achieve his objectives, the successes of the policies, the failures of the policies and the human cost of the policies. Stalin separated his policies into two which were industrialisation and collectivisation. The reasons Stalin chose to industrialise is that Russia was scared of the west. Stalin was afraid of been attacked by the capitalist west so set about making an industry so if war came Russia could produce arms fast and effectively. Stalin believed that this Western attack could happen very soon so speed was very important. Russia needed to be Self-sufficient also; this meant that it would be less dependant on other countries. Stalin aimed to catch up the 50-100 years Russia was behind everyone else in 5-10 years. ...read more.


There were two five year plans which were completed and also a third which had to be stopped. The 5 Year Plans basically set targets and helped people to realise what they were aiming for. In the countryside in order for Collectivisation to take place the State took direct control of agriculture and collectivised it. This meant that the peasants would put their lands together to form larger joint farms but they could also keep small plots for personal use. Animals and tools were also pooled together and the farms would be run by committees. Also the MTS (Motor Tractor Service) were provided by the communists to make tractors available and make farming easier. The Kolkhoz (collectivised farms) would produce 90% of their crop for the state who would then share out the profits and 10% to feed the peasants. Many peasants refused to collectives so party officials were sent out to the countryside that was called the 25,000ers (this was because there were 25,000 sent out) and forced those peasants who refused to collectivise. The officials were helped by the red army and the secret police. The main group of peasants to rebel were the Kulaks, the more prosperous peasants, and they simply refused to hand over anything and refused to becoming workers of the state so 'De-Kulakerisation' took place. ...read more.


Consumer goods were scarce and of poor quality. The working conditions on the large construction projects were appalling with many deaths and accidents. The workers were always working in dangerous conditions. Wages were also an issue. Wages fell between 1928 to 1937. Food was extremely basic also with just grain and crop being supplied. Strict discipline was also introduced in the factories which in most cases meant not many breaks and a lot of work. In the countryside over 13 million peasants died from famine, a lot of which came from the Ukraine. Also the almost all of the Kulaks were killed or sent off to labour camps where they were tortured and made to work for many hours on end. Many of the rebellious peasants were tortured or killed also. In conclusion I would say that Stalin's economic policies were a success. They achieved their main aim which was to win the next war which they did against Germany in World War 2. Stalin created a super power out a laughing stock in 10 years. But with some many people dying it is hard to call the whole thing a success. I would call Collectivisation a success and a failure as Russia managed to produce more grain than before but 13 million people died from a man made famine which is a terrible amount. Industrialisation I would call a success as Russia was now an industrial super power and it involved far less deaths than Collectivisation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. The Rebecca Riots

    could have been jealous, and that there was some sort of resentment to the rich that had everything compared to the nothing that the hardworking farmers had. There are a few weaknesses, but the origin of the source makes it stronger, because it was extracted from "The Times" in 1843,

  2. To what extent was the Irish Famine merely an excuse for Peel to repeal ...

    The fact that European corn was limited does suggest that the Corn Laws were outdated, as the additional costs on the imports were unnecessary. The Irish Famine presented a moral and economic dilemma to Peel, there were millions dying and leaving Ireland because of the lack of food.

  1. 'Law and Order in the American West'

    and economic differences, racial prejudice, lack of government intervention and various forms of competition for land, jobs and other money making opportunities often forced people to take the law into their own hands. The question 'whether the presence of vigilantes in early towns in the west made a positive or negative contribution to the problems of lawlessness and violence.'

  2. To what extent wasBritain Romanised

    Nodens was the god of hunting, while Sulis was mainly worshipped around the area of Bath. Throughout the Roman Empire, the people were allowed complete freedom of choice regarding their religious beliefs. So when the Romans came to Britain, instead of imposing their gods on the Celts, they attempted to link the Roman deities to their Celtic counterparts.

  1. How and Why Did The Rebecca Riots Develop?

    Again, we are not told why the workhouse was attacked or why these people were rioting. Another account written one week later makes the sweeping statement that people in Cardigan were 'terrorized' by a group of rioters wanting to attack the Pensarn tollgate.

  2. How was the schlieffen plan meant to work

    Because both sides had several trench lines they could easily defend their region so if either side attempted to blow up their opposition's frontline often this would make no change in their positions as their enemy could just go back to the support trenches behind and they could shoot down

  1. William was successful at Hastings because of his leadership of the Normans.(TM) To what ...

    Also William showed good leadership on the battlefield, unlike Harold Godwinsson, William fought with his men in the front, this meant that Williams men could take orders directly and more importantly, see him chopping down the English. Harold fought from the back which meant he had little control over his troops in the battle.

  2. Stoke Bruerne: Canal lives

    Although it is a still from Stoke Bruerne, the source is definitely unreliable and cannot be trusted. This is because it is a still from a film called, "Painted Boats". The still which can be seen most probably would have been edited by including extra things and removing parts to make the film as effective as possible.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work