• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent were Stalins economic policies successful?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent were Stalin's economic policies successful? After Lenin's death in January 1924 there was a struggle for power within the Bolshevik party as Lenin did not specify a new leader. This left a lot of people wanting to become leader but after a struggle Stalin became undisputed ruler in 1928. Soon after this he introduced his economic policies but in order to determine how successful these policies were we have to take in to account the reasons Stalin embarked on his economic policies, the targets of the policies, what he did to achieve his objectives, the successes of the policies, the failures of the policies and the human cost of the policies. Stalin separated his policies into two which were industrialisation and collectivisation. The reasons Stalin chose to industrialise is that Russia was scared of the west. Stalin was afraid of been attacked by the capitalist west so set about making an industry so if war came Russia could produce arms fast and effectively. Stalin believed that this Western attack could happen very soon so speed was very important. Russia needed to be Self-sufficient also; this meant that it would be less dependant on other countries. Stalin aimed to catch up the 50-100 years Russia was behind everyone else in 5-10 years. ...read more.

Middle

There were two five year plans which were completed and also a third which had to be stopped. The 5 Year Plans basically set targets and helped people to realise what they were aiming for. In the countryside in order for Collectivisation to take place the State took direct control of agriculture and collectivised it. This meant that the peasants would put their lands together to form larger joint farms but they could also keep small plots for personal use. Animals and tools were also pooled together and the farms would be run by committees. Also the MTS (Motor Tractor Service) were provided by the communists to make tractors available and make farming easier. The Kolkhoz (collectivised farms) would produce 90% of their crop for the state who would then share out the profits and 10% to feed the peasants. Many peasants refused to collectives so party officials were sent out to the countryside that was called the 25,000ers (this was because there were 25,000 sent out) and forced those peasants who refused to collectivise. The officials were helped by the red army and the secret police. The main group of peasants to rebel were the Kulaks, the more prosperous peasants, and they simply refused to hand over anything and refused to becoming workers of the state so 'De-Kulakerisation' took place. ...read more.

Conclusion

Consumer goods were scarce and of poor quality. The working conditions on the large construction projects were appalling with many deaths and accidents. The workers were always working in dangerous conditions. Wages were also an issue. Wages fell between 1928 to 1937. Food was extremely basic also with just grain and crop being supplied. Strict discipline was also introduced in the factories which in most cases meant not many breaks and a lot of work. In the countryside over 13 million peasants died from famine, a lot of which came from the Ukraine. Also the almost all of the Kulaks were killed or sent off to labour camps where they were tortured and made to work for many hours on end. Many of the rebellious peasants were tortured or killed also. In conclusion I would say that Stalin's economic policies were a success. They achieved their main aim which was to win the next war which they did against Germany in World War 2. Stalin created a super power out a laughing stock in 10 years. But with some many people dying it is hard to call the whole thing a success. I would call Collectivisation a success and a failure as Russia managed to produce more grain than before but 13 million people died from a man made famine which is a terrible amount. Industrialisation I would call a success as Russia was now an industrial super power and it involved far less deaths than Collectivisation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. William was successful at Hastings because of his leadership of the Normans.(TM) To what ...

    They had been organised for months and each man knew what he had to do before the battle. Williams army was also very large after a huge propaganda campaign had made men from all over France join him to defeat the oath breaker Harold.

  2. The Rebecca Riots

    It purely explains that tollgates were put up - there's no opinion from him about the tollgates, and whether he's against them being erected or not. It's not a weak source whatsoever; it's just pure fact. It's purpose was purely to explain that land owners had begun to build tollgates

  1. 'Law and Order in the American West'

    Eventually a vigilante committee was formed which put an end to these robberies by exposing the sheriff and then lynching him in 1865. Source I: An artist's impression of a James-Younger Gang bank raid in Northfield, Minnesota, in 1876.

  2. To what extent is Al Queda a terrorist organisation?

    Some Muslims even believe that these States are worse than Christians and Jews, because at least they pretend to be nothing else, whereas apostolic states betray the very principles of Islam. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are examples of these states.

  1. The Great Famine

    Most of the early migrants were from Ulster as well as Leitrim and Sligo. From 1815 to 1845 approximately 250,000 left Ireland for North America.

  2. Henry FOrd

    Immigrants highly helped America; they did any job and smoothed over any cracks in business. This made them more powerful and created a lot more money. More workers, means more produces and profit; therefore was a key part of driving America into success in the 1920's.

  1. How and Why Did The Rebecca Riots Develop?

    It gives very specific details, including a precise time and the number of horsemen that led the rioters. The source reiterates what has been said in other sources about the rioters' dress - faces painted black and wearing women's clothing.

  2. Stoke Bruerne: Canal lives

    And because of these reasons the museum evidence was better than Source C. Looking at Source D, this shows a still from the film "painted boats" made on location at Stoke Bruerne and Blisworth in 1944. Looking at the source, the still shows a narrowbaot, with children playing alongside it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work