• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Tsarist rule in the years 1856 - 1917 and Communist rule from the death of Lenin to the death of Stalin both depended on high degrees of central power and control by the state. The similarities between the two forms of government were therefore much g...

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Tsarist rule in the years 1856 - 1917 and Communist rule from the death of Lenin to the death of Stalin both depended on high degrees of central power and control by the state. The similarities between the two forms of government were therefore much greater than were the differences. How far do you agree with this judgement? It cannot be denied that both Tsarist and Soviet government did indeed rely on a high degree of central power and state control. However, the statement incorrectly follows that "therefore" the two regimes had more similarities than differences. The fact that the period 1856 - 1917 involved the rule of Alexander II, Alexander III and Nicholas II meant three different styles of rule, and ultimately different levels of state repression. However, since both the communist and Tsarist regimes faced similar difficulties, the sheer size of Russia and the ever present problems with agriculture, for example, they both inevitably had similar aims. Both regimes wished to modernize Russia, while preserving their own position of authority and prevent Western intervention. However, the methods each regime used to do this and the results of these methods differed between them. The motives of their aims also varied - Stalin had a political motivation for isolation from the West (communism versus capitalism), whilst the Tsar wished to preserve Russian tradition and symbolism. ...read more.

Middle

This certainly does not explain the irrelevance of the Soviets during his reign, but his attitude varies with the Tsar, who probably simply resented handing any of his God-given power to other authorities. The fact that Stalin personally signed every order of execution issued during the purges outlines the level of his involvement. It should also be remembered that despite the reforms and slight de-centralisation of power that can be seen under Alexander II, 1882 84 saw counter - reforms, and after his assassination in 1881, temporary regulations gave the police extra power to crush revolutionary activity - displaying similar attitudes to Communism - that ultimately the people needed to be repressed, not encouraged in order to ensure compliance. This is seen in Stalin's reaction to the peasant's stubbornness in response to Collectivisation, for example. The Orthodox Church was undoubtedly very important for the Tsar. It almost helped legitimize his claim that the Tsar possessed a God-given right to rule the country, and justified the autocratic nature of Tsarist rule. Particularly by the peasants, the Tsar was seen as a "father figure." However, by the early twentieth century, the overall opinion of the Russian people, now becoming increasingly educated, was that this claim was no longer as legitimate as it had once been considered. ...read more.

Conclusion

The use of press censorship, the military and general oppression by both regimes are strikingly similar, despite different motives. Neither the Soviets, nor the Zemstvos had any sort of power or influence, and the fact that the regimes were running such a massive country from either Moscow or St. Petersburg itself suggests a central state control. Both the Tsar, as a result of his divine right, and Stalin, due to self interest and paranoia, totally ruled everything in Russia, and any power designated elsewhere was never a significant amount. Although Stalin ensured that the following was not the case, the role of the leader was not integral to the ideology of Marxism, unlike in Tsarism. After the fall of Khrushchev, there was collective leadership, suggesting the central control exercised by Stalin within the Communist Party was indeed a part of his cult of personality. It can also be said that overwhelmingly the similarities between the two forms of government do outweigh the differences. Differences are often subtle or arise due to a variation of motivation. However, the question focuses on the degree of dependence of central control and power by the state, thus any other differences focusing on other subjects have not been examined, and so a response to the second part of this statement can only be based on the subjects referred to in the question. Words - 2181 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    Because of the five-year plans, many new industrial options were open to Russia, allowing them to build better weapons and most importantly, tanks. The Russian tanks of World War Two proved to be quite a formidable force, especially against the German army.

  2. How did Stalin control Russia from 1924-1953?

    In conclusion, at least 20 million peasants either died or were killed due to Collectivisation. There was such extreme hardship and terrible poverty for almost the entire population of peasants. However, Stalin held onto his control by "cleansing" all the people who complained about it, like he did during the purges.

  1. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    then it would not be unreasonable to suggest that the camera could simply be brought closer and closer to the men, until they filled the entire picture. They may have wanted to do this for several reasons. Mainly, they could have shown this picture to the Tsar (via newspapers)

  2. History Force essay. A specific individual and group, Lenin and the Bolsheviks ...

    They campaigned with Lenin's slogan "Peace, bread and Land". Majority of the people in Russia supported the Bolsheviks because they campaigned for everything the PG had failed to deliver. With the return of Lenin from Finland, the Bolshevik's successfully carried out a communist influenced revolution known as the "October Revolution" in 1917.

  1. Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

    people began to walk across the river because the water was still frozen. Officers ordered troops to fire. The soldiers shot about forty people before refusing to continue to obey orders. Meanwhile, twelve Duma Deputies had formed a Provisional Committee to take over the government.

  2. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    Some people even accused others as opposition to Stalin to settle feuds and old scores. The majority of the people arrested received no proper trial; they were either immediately executed or sent to labour camps in Siberia and the Soviet Arctic.

  1. Assess the Impact Stalin Had On Russia and Its People Stalin came to ...

    The output of collectives was shared. Collectivisation brought socialism to the peasants; it was a revolution in the countryside. "Collectivisation accomplished its main aims. In the first place, the regime could now commander food from the peasants at incredibly low prices... Then it acquired the additional working force for industrialisation...

  2. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    The General continues to describe how the hospitals and the Red Cross stations were in excellent condition but the war hospitals were very disorganized to the extent that there were shortages of bandages and medical equipment. The comparison between the Red Cross and the military hospitals truly highlights how chaotic the Russian war effort was.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work