• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Tsarist rule in the years 1856 - 1917 and Communist rule from the death of Lenin to the death of Stalin both depended on high degrees of central power and control by the state. The similarities between the two forms of government were therefore much g...

Extracts from this document...


Tsarist rule in the years 1856 - 1917 and Communist rule from the death of Lenin to the death of Stalin both depended on high degrees of central power and control by the state. The similarities between the two forms of government were therefore much greater than were the differences. How far do you agree with this judgement? It cannot be denied that both Tsarist and Soviet government did indeed rely on a high degree of central power and state control. However, the statement incorrectly follows that "therefore" the two regimes had more similarities than differences. The fact that the period 1856 - 1917 involved the rule of Alexander II, Alexander III and Nicholas II meant three different styles of rule, and ultimately different levels of state repression. However, since both the communist and Tsarist regimes faced similar difficulties, the sheer size of Russia and the ever present problems with agriculture, for example, they both inevitably had similar aims. Both regimes wished to modernize Russia, while preserving their own position of authority and prevent Western intervention. However, the methods each regime used to do this and the results of these methods differed between them. The motives of their aims also varied - Stalin had a political motivation for isolation from the West (communism versus capitalism), whilst the Tsar wished to preserve Russian tradition and symbolism. ...read more.


This certainly does not explain the irrelevance of the Soviets during his reign, but his attitude varies with the Tsar, who probably simply resented handing any of his God-given power to other authorities. The fact that Stalin personally signed every order of execution issued during the purges outlines the level of his involvement. It should also be remembered that despite the reforms and slight de-centralisation of power that can be seen under Alexander II, 1882 84 saw counter - reforms, and after his assassination in 1881, temporary regulations gave the police extra power to crush revolutionary activity - displaying similar attitudes to Communism - that ultimately the people needed to be repressed, not encouraged in order to ensure compliance. This is seen in Stalin's reaction to the peasant's stubbornness in response to Collectivisation, for example. The Orthodox Church was undoubtedly very important for the Tsar. It almost helped legitimize his claim that the Tsar possessed a God-given right to rule the country, and justified the autocratic nature of Tsarist rule. Particularly by the peasants, the Tsar was seen as a "father figure." However, by the early twentieth century, the overall opinion of the Russian people, now becoming increasingly educated, was that this claim was no longer as legitimate as it had once been considered. ...read more.


The use of press censorship, the military and general oppression by both regimes are strikingly similar, despite different motives. Neither the Soviets, nor the Zemstvos had any sort of power or influence, and the fact that the regimes were running such a massive country from either Moscow or St. Petersburg itself suggests a central state control. Both the Tsar, as a result of his divine right, and Stalin, due to self interest and paranoia, totally ruled everything in Russia, and any power designated elsewhere was never a significant amount. Although Stalin ensured that the following was not the case, the role of the leader was not integral to the ideology of Marxism, unlike in Tsarism. After the fall of Khrushchev, there was collective leadership, suggesting the central control exercised by Stalin within the Communist Party was indeed a part of his cult of personality. It can also be said that overwhelmingly the similarities between the two forms of government do outweigh the differences. Differences are often subtle or arise due to a variation of motivation. However, the question focuses on the degree of dependence of central control and power by the state, thus any other differences focusing on other subjects have not been examined, and so a response to the second part of this statement can only be based on the subjects referred to in the question. Words - 2181 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    Stalin encouraged women to work but wanted their family lives to be traditional. The amount of women workers rose from 3 to 13 million. This increase in workers certainly contributed to the five-year plans success. Most women had traditionally 'female jobs', for example in the textile industry.

  2. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    In Source G, General Ruzsky suggested that the best course of action would have been to call a congress of the heads of the Zemstvos and request for their co-operation. Should the Tsar fail to use the Zemstvos to organise the war effort then it could be seen that the

  1. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    then it would not be unreasonable to suggest that the camera could simply be brought closer and closer to the men, until they filled the entire picture. They may have wanted to do this for several reasons. Mainly, they could have shown this picture to the Tsar (via newspapers)

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    Rationing was abolished in 1936, as the rationing of bread and meat was scrapped in 1935. Consequently due to Industrialisation unemployment levels fell also some reports do suggest that the workers were satisfied with the working conditions. Unfortunately for workers Stalin changed their working days by revealing that instead of

  1. Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

    The workers, soldiers and sailors of St. Petersburg formed a Soviet to watch over them. This shows that the people of Russia have totally lost confidence in Nicholas and now they are trying to plot against him to rule their country.

  2. How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union?

    As such, I think that Lenin was very important in the creation of the Soviet Union because of the risk that he took to establish it. Similarly to Lenin, Stalin also acted decisively to achieve his goals. After he took control of the USSR, Stalin instigated a series of Purges,


    Russia's rural population also doubled in the period 1861-1913 (74 million to 164 million), which further increased the problems. The looked to solve the problems with the economy by providing credit to keep the system afloat. They founded a Nobles' Land Bank in 1882 and a peasants' Land Bank 1885, however these did little to alleviate the pressure.

  2. How did Stalin control Russia from 1924-1953?

    convince them that they were working to build a better, more able, Russia. In 1935, a man named Andrew Stakhanov famously dug 102 tonnes of coal in one shift. This was 14 times the average amount, and although he had two helpers to help with his shift, Stalin used him

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work