• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Use sources F, G, and your own knowledge to explain how the police tried to catch Jack the Ripper.

Extracts from this document...


4) Use sources F, G, and your own knowledge to explain how the police tried to catch Jack the Ripper. In the 1880s, the police were very different from the police of today. Their main propose was crime prevention and their methods their methods were very primitive Source F is a police leaflet, which was published after the murders of Elizabeth Stride and Kate Eddowes; it was written to aid the police in their investigation it was also written in a factual tone, it suggests that the police were appealing for any information regarding suspicious characters. Because of the timing of this leaflet shows the desperation faced by the police but for because of the many defects reasons the leaflet was not successful: The first being that they did not offer any description of the murderer at all, 'person to whom suspicion was attached'. ...read more.


The leaflet also suggests that the police had run out of all possible leads and were using this leaflet as a last attempt. To sum up source F shows us that that the police methods were very much reliant on witnesses and help from the public. Source G is part of a letter from the Home Secretary to the mile End Vigilance Committee dated 17th September, after the murder of Annie Chapman, and comments on the issue surrounding the reward. As it is from the home secretary, it may be slightly bias towards the not giving the reward; but still, inferring from it, it can be seen that the public was loosing faith in the police force as they had set up their own Vigilance Committee. The letter justifies why there was no reward given out, in fact it states, "Experience showed that such offers of rewards tended to produce more harm than good". ...read more.


hope they would bump into the killer in the act, so to improve this chance they increased their patrols greatly during the height of the murders, in some cases bodies were stumbled on while they were still warm. An other thing the police did in order to catch the killer was asking witnesses and carrying out doing door to door enquires. Because they did not have and forensics this was the main things, they relied upon this a lot In conclusion, the police used many techniques in order to catch the killer they carried out: door-to-door inquiries, they put out notices to the public, and they had police officers under cover and they increased there police presence in the white Chapple area very greatly, despite all of these attempts the public still lost faith in the police force. This was reflected in the forming of the mile end vigilant committee. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. How far was the monarchy responsible for its own downfall in September 1792? Explain ...

    Louis stated that he was in favour of the constitution and would uphold it, however due to his previous actions people did not believe him; he had not only lost control of France but over his own person.

  2. Studying sources F, G, H and I and using my own knowledge I will ...

    Supplementary evidence that this piece of writing is against the workhouse system is he states that poverty is a crime. This shows that the paupers were treated like criminals just for being poor.

  1. Use Sources F and G and your own knowledge, to explain how the police ...

    Source G also suggests that the government's attitude towards prostitutes was extremely low. They seemed to care little about trying to find the killer, which suggests that they do not see prostitutes as very important. Source G is a reliable source because it is a primary source and has a date of when written.

  2. Using the sources and my own knowledge explain if I agree with this assessment ...

    The buildings themselves were stark, undecorated, prison-like structures. There were no curves in the buildings, only sharp corners. There was no architectural decoration. High walls surrounded the whole workhouse, cutting off the view of the outside world from the inmates.

  1. Theory of knowledge

    The only way they can do this is by using their own thought processes. Historians recognize that to portray history is impossible. They cannot really be sure of the motives of the writers of the archive documents. "The past can only be seen through the eyes of the present".

  2. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    took place in 1988-49 years after the war, which means the source is secondary. The purpose of this source is to find out a person's point of view on evacuation, however it is only one persons view and opinion and as it is so many years after, memories can fade

  1. Use sources F and G, and your own knowledge, to explain how the police ...

    This resulted in "leather Apron" being arrested, among with other suspicious characters that were arrested and released as a result of poor informant information. This wasted a lot of police time as there were actually few police. They needed the police to be out on the streets of White Chapel instead of interviewing informants with poor information.

  2. History Sources Question : Murder in the East End

    It has been written to sell and it has been sensationalised in order to appeal to the buying public. Also, the authors of sources B and C had seen the bodies of the victims, whereas the reporter that wrote source A had probably not seen the body of Polly Nicholls (or Martha Tabram).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work