• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Stalin a Disaster For the Soviet Union?

Extracts from this document...


Stalin was called many things. Many christened him 'The gravedigger of the Revolution', saying that the entire socialist plans and ideas that were in place after the 1917 revolution were destroyed once Stalin was in power. A whole new socialist and essentially Communist society was expected in Russia but after Stalin took over the ideas never quite made it into daily life. Some call Stalin a murderer and an evil man. One who killed millions of innocent Russians for what was seen as no real reason. Stalin made it clear to his nation that he knew there was a conspiracy and the conspirers must be eliminated but there was still scepticism among Russians about the truth of Stalin's statement. Other people though look upon Stalin as a creator, a genius, who masterminded the return of Russia into the world's powers and gave birth to many great ideas such as industrialisation, the agricultural revolution and all in the space of 30 years. Such ideas about a great Russia would have been laughed at in the November of 1917, even after the revolution, but Stalin knew that he had to reach power and knew he would create a world power out of Russia again. ...read more.


Many former farmers would have been without work if it weren't for the second part of Stalin's plans, an Industrial Revolution. Stalin's 5-year plans were seen as the way for Russia to become an industrial power. Only a strong economy would be able to compete with the capitalist powers and Stalin was adamant that Communism would prevail and succeed. Stalin's idea was to carry over a large mass of peasants from the agricultural revolution and turn them into an industrial workforce. Coupled with great machines and factories Stalin felt that money and jobs would encourage peasants to be a part of the great industrial revolution that was greatly overdue in Russia. If other countries would look at Russia and wish to emulate them then Stalin would have succeeded. Stalin believed that a planned economy was the way to develop industry and it would be the State who decided what was made, how much would be made and issues about prices and wages. Many advances were made by Russia including an amazing new dam and an underground rail network. The Russian people saw these great works and this brought about great enthusiasm from the Russian people who now more than ever wanted to contribute to the Russian Dream. ...read more.


Any form of art that defied the conventions defined by Stalin fell under the category of 'bourgeois' art and the artists would be often arrested. Under such an environment without freedom of ideas it is exceedingly clear that the leader has total control. This was called the Cult of Stalin, Stalin dictator of Russia. So in my opinion was Stalin a disaster for Russia?... well firstly lets look at the meaning of disaster for it is a strong word. "A sudden great misfortune, great failure". Was Stalin a sudden great misfortune, not really. At first many people took him to heart and saw him as the right person to take the reigns off of the late Lenin and carry on with the one aim or rebuilding Russia. There was no misfortune about it and although many died it is without doubt that Russia profited from Stalin, he was not a failure. When he came to power Russia relied on simple farmers who still couldn't produce enough food to feed their own nation. Thanks to Stalin Russia was by the 1940's a strong industrial power with a workforce and many great creations to show for it. Stalin can be called many things but in my opinion, not a disaster. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    * Coal out put at Kutnesk increased greatly. * New industrial towns were built in the Urals, Siberia and the Far East. Many people were forced to move to these towns, e.g. Karaganoa, Magnitgorsk. * No unemployment. This huge increase in industrial production was achieved by the following: * Foreign experts and engineers were brought into Russia.

  2. How Successful Were Stalin's Policies During His Leadership of the Soviet Union?

    Nonetheless Stalin did prove to be a very effective military leader and was able to quickly regain initiative in the war. A crucial decision made by Stalin was for the large-scale movement of the war industry to the east as this sustained the Red Army's war machine with astonishing success.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    Even in February 1930, when the government boasted that the majority of the peasants handed over their land for collectivisation, the grain shortage problem had not been solved. The result was a famine in the cities as food production fell drastically with grain production falling from 83.5 million in 1930 to 69.6 million in 1932.

  2. Was terror the main reason why Stalin kept power in the Soviet Union?

    This was a subtle approach because Stalin was educating them in communism even though they did not know. Another thing is they could not do anything about it because they were forced to go to school and if they did not they would probably be arrested by the Secret Police.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    The main aim was to show to the people of Russia that he was great man and associate him with the achievements that he made under his leadership. This was and still is a tactic that many people in the public eye use.

  2. How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union?

    As such I think that we can conclude he was much more aware of the pressures being imposed by capitalist nations, and wanted to form nation that could compete on equal terms. I think that Comniform was essential for this because it showed how communism could spread and demonstrated Unity of the USSR.

  1. How did Stalin control Russia from 1924-1953?

    was the reason the Bolsheviks came to power after the 1917 Revolution. Stalin made himself look as if he was as important to Russia's history as Lenin was, and many pictures showed them as friends, even though they rarely met.

  2. How important was Lenin compared to Stalin in creating the Soviet Union?

    because there are more benefits for the peasant if they do that little bit extra. Evidence to support this source can be shown in the following: Bukharin speaking in 1922. He was a leading Bolshevik and a strong supporter of the NEP.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work