• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Stalin a Disaster For the Soviet Union?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Stalin was called many things. Many christened him 'The gravedigger of the Revolution', saying that the entire socialist plans and ideas that were in place after the 1917 revolution were destroyed once Stalin was in power. A whole new socialist and essentially Communist society was expected in Russia but after Stalin took over the ideas never quite made it into daily life. Some call Stalin a murderer and an evil man. One who killed millions of innocent Russians for what was seen as no real reason. Stalin made it clear to his nation that he knew there was a conspiracy and the conspirers must be eliminated but there was still scepticism among Russians about the truth of Stalin's statement. Other people though look upon Stalin as a creator, a genius, who masterminded the return of Russia into the world's powers and gave birth to many great ideas such as industrialisation, the agricultural revolution and all in the space of 30 years. Such ideas about a great Russia would have been laughed at in the November of 1917, even after the revolution, but Stalin knew that he had to reach power and knew he would create a world power out of Russia again. ...read more.

Middle

Many former farmers would have been without work if it weren't for the second part of Stalin's plans, an Industrial Revolution. Stalin's 5-year plans were seen as the way for Russia to become an industrial power. Only a strong economy would be able to compete with the capitalist powers and Stalin was adamant that Communism would prevail and succeed. Stalin's idea was to carry over a large mass of peasants from the agricultural revolution and turn them into an industrial workforce. Coupled with great machines and factories Stalin felt that money and jobs would encourage peasants to be a part of the great industrial revolution that was greatly overdue in Russia. If other countries would look at Russia and wish to emulate them then Stalin would have succeeded. Stalin believed that a planned economy was the way to develop industry and it would be the State who decided what was made, how much would be made and issues about prices and wages. Many advances were made by Russia including an amazing new dam and an underground rail network. The Russian people saw these great works and this brought about great enthusiasm from the Russian people who now more than ever wanted to contribute to the Russian Dream. ...read more.

Conclusion

Any form of art that defied the conventions defined by Stalin fell under the category of 'bourgeois' art and the artists would be often arrested. Under such an environment without freedom of ideas it is exceedingly clear that the leader has total control. This was called the Cult of Stalin, Stalin dictator of Russia. So in my opinion was Stalin a disaster for Russia?... well firstly lets look at the meaning of disaster for it is a strong word. "A sudden great misfortune, great failure". Was Stalin a sudden great misfortune, not really. At first many people took him to heart and saw him as the right person to take the reigns off of the late Lenin and carry on with the one aim or rebuilding Russia. There was no misfortune about it and although many died it is without doubt that Russia profited from Stalin, he was not a failure. When he came to power Russia relied on simple farmers who still couldn't produce enough food to feed their own nation. Thanks to Stalin Russia was by the 1940's a strong industrial power with a workforce and many great creations to show for it. Stalin can be called many things but in my opinion, not a disaster. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How Successful Were Stalin's Policies During His Leadership of the Soviet Union?

    In the post-war period it could be argued that Stalin mismanaged his country's relations with its former allies and that his policies united Europe and America in a solid anti-Soviet bloc. Stalin again feared the threat of an invasion from the west and therefore between 1945 and 1948 he created

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    However, over a short period Stalin found out that this measure was not sufficient. In 1929 Stalin declared that there was to be a more fundamental resolution to sort out the dilemma, this was called, collectivisation. Those who were against Collectivisation kept quiet due to fear of imprisonment.

  1. How did Stalin control Russia from 1924-1953?

    And because, in the end, Russia was successful over Germany in WWII, this showed that although collectivisation had been tough, it had gotten results. This helped Stalin keep his hold on Russia, when it could have slipped through his fingers.

  2. Russia 1905-1945 Stalin - man or monster - source based questions

    In conclusion, from the information and reliability of some sources and my own knowledge I totally agree that Stalin could have acted with sense toknow that killing people or missing a comrade is state of worry, but the behaviour towards both as a politician and to the people he acted

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    Stalin also represented the ideas of 'Socialism in one country' as opposed to 'continuous revolution' and this had a greater appeal. Stalin was also seen as a great man by some people, he improved science in Russia tremendously. Although no great theoretical contributions were made from Stalin's linguistics, neither were there any apparent mistakes in Stalin's understanding in linguistics.

  2. Was terror the main reason why Stalin kept power in the Soviet Union?

    Stalin also used other methods to terrorise the people. Stalin staged trials after he had arrested people and accused them of things they could not have possibly done. These were called the "Show Trials". Stalin could have just put the accused in prison or executed them without the trials but

  1. Stalin man or monster

    frantic, this could reflect the torture they had undergone which lead to the convicts loosing a grip of reality and admitting anything. The effect of this sarcastic manner is that it reflects the absurdity of these crimes they are being accused off and that they were forced to confess.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    Moving on, this started a series of relieves for Stalin as it allowed the thriving USSR to prepare for defence in case of a dreaded foreign capitalist invasion and also enabled the USSR to compete with the industrial counties of the West who according to Stalin had always crushed Russia

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work