• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the October revolution a popular uprising or a coup d(TM)tat?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was the October revolution a popular uprising or a coup d'�tat? There is one debate between historians about the October revolution in Russia in 1917, and this is whether it was a popular uprising or a coup d'�tat. A popular revolution is one that is supported, and sometimes led by the majority of the population of that country. A coup d'�tat is a quick seizure of government by a small group of people, often by using violence. It is not supported by the majority of the population, and force is used. One view of the October revolution is the Revisionist view. They 'wrote in the 1970's and were nicknamed the cold warriors'. This was because they thought that the hostile accounts of the October revolution were part of cold war tactics and that they may be biased, as they were influenced by the Vietnam War and were critical of American policies and ideas. ...read more.

Middle

This could be because they had to conform to the idolising views of the Bolshevik party, as many historians of their time had to. This means that this view may not be entirely trustworthy, as it is so biased. The predominant western view after 1945 differs greatly to the traditional Soviet view, as they viewed the October revolution as a coup d'�tat. They thought that it triggered the 'straight line' from Leninism and Bolshevism to Stalinism, which was total rule by a dictator with no civil rights or freedom to express political views or opinions. This makes the October revolution sound like it was not supported by the majority of the Russian revolution as they would have had no freedom of speech or civil rights. Unlike the traditional Soviet view, this view sees Lenin as being in complete control of the Bolshevik party, with the other members of the party being like 'puppets' to him and obeying his every command. ...read more.

Conclusion

There were definitely key figures in leading the October revolution, such as Lenin. Lenin's perseverance and ability to motivate people through his public speaking meant that the popularity of the Bolsheviks grew throughout Russia. Lenin became a recognised face with the working class and the support gained from the majority of the population due to this (from peasants, workers, soldiers and sailors). This can contribute to the argument that the October revolution was a popular uprising, as they had so much support from the Russian people. There was also an increase in radicalism throughout the population of Russia. People were beginning to want more radical things from the government, and the Bolsheviks were able to feed this new need for radicalism. This also shows that the October revolution could have been a popular uprising, as they were winning peoples support through their actions and policies. "Peace bread and land" was one of the slogans that brought popularity to the Bolsheviks, and promising land to the peasants was a radical idea (as it meant taking land off the landowners). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Account for the success of the Bolshevik revolution in

    approach to the solution of Russia's problems.'6 This conservatism and inefficiency to solving the numerous internal problems generated further popular discontent. The Provisional Government's lack of 'genuine' authority contributed to the success of the Bolshevik revolution in October, 1917. The Dual Authority exercised between the Provisional Government and the Petrograd Soviet, indeed crippled the government's integrity of rule.

  2. The Causes of the October Revolution

    Middle class support grew for the Bolsheviks because the provisional government had abolished the ownership of land with no compensation. The Bolsheviks promised to give this land back if they got into power. So there were four main groups of people: soldiers, peasants, workers and the middle class landowners.

  1. Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

    When the Tsar finally realized what was happening he set off from the Military headquarters at Mogilev in his royal train for his family home in, Tsarskoe Selo. His Train stopped at Pskov station, so that he could get help but instead he learnt that his generals would no longer support him.

  2. Why was Lenin important in bringing about the October revolution?

    They believed that the working classes would, at some point, liberate themselves from the economic and political control of the ruling classes. Once they had achieved this, a genuine socialist society based on equality could be established. In their view, this process was bound to take place, sooner or later.

  1. The Bolshevik Coup

    - The Provisional Government did a number of things, which they thought would help them prevent a Coup, however the precautions that they took weren't enough. They did the following: � Cut telephone wires to the Bolshevik Headquarters � Raised the bridges over the River Neva to stop crowds from

  2. Was the October Revolution inevitable

    Their had been considerable support (around 80,000 picketers) for this movement lead by George Gapon who witness the massacre that ensued at the hands of the Tsar and wrote 'a new chapter was opened in the book of history of our people' which signalled the 1905 revolution.

  1. Why was the Bolshevik revolution of 1917 successful

    There was also of the problems of rumours against the government becoming more popular ideas. Tsar Nicholas decided to leave and take personal command of his forces at the army headquarters 500 kilometres away. He left his wife Alexandra in charge of the government in Petrograd, who was completely under the influence of Rasputin.

  2. What Were The Causes of The1905 Revolution & TheConsequences of The Uprising?

    Alexander II did set up limited local authorities called Zemstva, which mainly concentrated on agricultural issues. This created greater awareness amongst the people and a liberal class of Intelligencia was set up. They wanted Russia to become democratic and opposed the Tsars' autocratic rule and later became known as the 'Kadets'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work