• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Were the alliances of WWI more likely to cause or to prevent war?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Were the alliances of WWI more likely to cause or to prevent war? Alliances linked nations (groups of people) together from the first tribal wars on. In the early parts of the second millennium, nations were commonly linked through marriage or relation of their leaders. This usually linked two or three nation, but never were entire continents divided into two camps of allies. This allying didn't come about until the 19th and 20th centuries, with the coming to power of the Central powers and the Allies of WWI. But were these alliances that divided a continent and drew intercontinental players more likely to have causes the hell of WWI, or to have prevented it? This question will be answered through an investigation of the alliances of from the time after the Franco Prussian war of 1870 to the outbreak of WWI. A concluding paragraph will answer the question at hand. In 1870, France, under Napoleon the 3rd, declared war on newly united Germany, under Kaiser Wilhelm the 2nd, and the military council of Otto von Bismarck. ...read more.

Middle

They also agreed to help each other in the case of Germany attacking. Germany, so strong industrially, so confident militarily, resented the close alliance between her western and eastern neighbors, France and Russia. As a counterweight, she clung to her southern neighbor Austria-Hungry, a partner in need, however cumbersome that partner might be2. With the realization of a future war on two fronts, the German chief of German General Staff Alfred von Schlieffen developed a plan for that war in 1905. It involved the bulk of the German army sweeping to France to defeat them in a quick manor, with the rest of the German army holding off the slow Russians. The Kaiser made a pilgrimage to Jerusalem, where he indicated to the Ottoman Turkish Empire, and to the whole Muslim world, that they could look at Germany as a friend. By the beginning of WWI, the alliances of Germany made up the Central Powers, which included Germany, Austria-Hungry, the Ottoman Empire, and Bulgaria. ...read more.

Conclusion

The division of Europe into two armed camps did nothing to ease the tensions and old rivalries of Europe. Countries that entered into these alliances received a somewhat false sense of security, and allowed them to be more bold with unilateral moves, knowing that they would be backed up by their allies. The two camps of Europe did recognize the power of the other one, and did realize what it would mean if they were to go to war. This mutual understanding prevented the war for some time, but left tensions that could be cut with a knife. What the connection of everyone to someone meant was that events such as the assassination of the Austria-Hungarian heir to the throne Francis Ferdinand that would normally cause a localized war drew everyone into it. The alliances may have postponed the war, but did not prevent it. They allowed for there to be, for the first time, a world war, above the scale that was ever seen before. If the alliances were not there, there probably would have been just a war in the Balkans, but it is very hard to tell what might have happened. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. The Long Fuse by Laurence Lafore - Chapter Three: The Europe of the Armed ...

    Bismarck started noticing that to try to get voters to vote for the parties they wanted to win, they had to use national traditions to lure them into voting that way. The military in France was also strong but there were disagreements whether the rights of the individual or the rights of the military were more important.

  2. Questions on World War One.

    You should take care to distinguish between the localised Balkan issue and the reasons for the wider involvement of the major Powers in a European conflict, and be clear as to how the one led to the other after Sarajevo.

  1. Causes of WWI

    The German Navy Law of 1898 increased the German battleships from nine cruisers to twelve. In 1900 Germany passed a Navy Law which doubled the German battle fleet. In the meantime, Britain produced her first Dreadnought (literally, the word means fear nothing).

  2. Compare the origins of WWI & WWII

    WWI, it rejected to take responsibility of controlling the balance of power in Europe, and thus let Germany to gain preponderance, which resulted in the outbreak of war. The majour difference between the origins of the WWI and the WWII lie on the individual level.

  1. Explain the importance of the war at sea to the final outcome of WWI

    British tactics at this point were pretty poor, although there were methods put into practice, such as decoy ships. The climax of this first submarine campaign culminated in the sinking of the passenger ship called the Lusitania. It was torpedoed south of Ireland, having started its journey in New York, claiming nearly 1200 innocent lives.

  2. Strategic alliances

    This may then lead tolower unit production costs and economies of network density result. The second explanation for the formation of strategic alliances is their possible use to limit competition in the markets. As there exist several restrictions on market and route entry, capacity and pricing in domestic and international

  1. As demonstrated by these five historians, the theories on the primary cause of WWI ...

    Serbia felt strong nationalism at the time and felt the need to bring all of Serbia together, under one national government. This brought upon the assassination of Archduke of Austria because at the time, Austria controlled Bosnia, which contained a largely Serbian population.

  2. The main cause of World War One was the alliances. How far do the ...

    On the other hand, this source also states militarism as the factor that brings about the creation of alliances, which therefore means that it ranks militarism as the major underlying factor as to why the war happened ("Austria had regarded the growing power of Serbia with concern for many years...")

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work