• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Were the peace treaties of 1919 - 1923 fair?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Were the peace treaties of 1919 - 1923 fair? Introduction After World War I various peace treaties were made, the most important and well known being the Treaty of Versailles. At the Treaty of Versailles there was disagreement, France wanted Germany to be punished as severely as possible whereas Britain and the USA realized that punishing Germany too harshly would only cause far worse problems later on. Britain and France both wanted to capitalize on World War I and gain German and Turkish colonies, the USA was against this and considered this kind of behaviour imperialistic however a compromise was reached and the colonies were divided among the winning powers and ran on behalf of the League of Nations. Meanwhile in Eastern Europe various other treaties were being signed - The Treaty of Neuilly, The Treaty of Trianon, The Treaty of Saint-Germain, The Treaty of S�vres and finally the Treaty of Lausanne. Although none of these treaties were as important as Versailles they would all affect peace in Europe in the years following the First World War. ...read more.

Middle

Germany had absolutely no right to Belgium. Argument stating that the peace treaties of 1919 - 1923 were unfair: The Treaty of Versailles was extremely unfair. Germany was used as a scapegoat and made to take almost entire blame for a war, which was only partially Germany's fault. Germany suffered huge losses herself in the war and had suffered hugely; Germany was forced to pay ridiculously high reparations - basically for just losing the war. The reparations Germany was forced to pay were enormously high, the German economy had suffered hugely during the war. The huge reparations would only worsen the German economy and cause extreme poverty throughout Germany. Argument stating that the peace treaties of 1919 - 1923 were fair: The Treaty of Saint-Germain was fair and just, Austria was forbidden from ever seeking unification with Germany and her army was limited to 30,000 men. Austria-Hungry was a danger to future peace in Europe and quite rightly a large chunk of Austria was divided into 3 new states - Czechoslovakia, Poland and Yugoslavia. ...read more.

Conclusion

Turkey was also forced to pay large reparations, which it could not afford. Whilst Turkey had lost much of her empire Britain and France were adding to theirs by taking Syria, Israel, Jordan and Iraq - Turkey will have been annoyed at this too. The Treaty of S�vres gave Turkey a very bad deal. The Treaty of Trianon was unfair on Hungry, two thirds of Hungary's territory was lost - this reduced Hungary's population to just 7 million from 18 million. Conclusion Some of the treaties made after WWI probably were unfair however the Treaty of Versailles was not unfair. Germany lost little territory and any punishment that they did receive was probably deserved. Millions of allied soldiers - British and French as well as American soldiers lost their lives fighting a bloody battle that could have been averted had Germany not gone to war. Some of the other European treaties were unfair but to make treaties that left everyone happy and everyone thinking that they were fair would have been impossible. It was difficult enough for three allies - Britain, USA and France to agree on a treaty. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a strong response that offers a good range of reasons and is balanced by considering both sides of the argument. The sub headings are unnecessary as the author's structure is clear enough and the points are valid but evidence is a little thin in places. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 01/12/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Why did war break out in Europe in 1939

    taken power in 1933 and France was more concerned about this than Italy invading and Britain wasn't prepared to act without French support. Both Britain and France wanted to make Italy an ally so they had protection against Germany. After this crisis and the Manchurian crisis Hitler had no reason

  2. How fair was the treaty of Versailles?

    The French people were fully behind their leader. However it should also have remembered that the war had been extremely expensive and that by the end of it Britain and France had large debts to repay. In addition, France especially had suffered extensive and damage to large parts of the country that would cost a great deal to put right.

  1. Trench warfare. Trench warfare was created to help hold your position and fend ...

    In trenches there wasn't really away to get supplies other then the ones brought to you by you comrades so there was never really any supplies for the soldiers. Food was late or cold more then often, therefore soldiers normally ate their food they brought with them.

  2. Why was the Treaty of Versailles so Controversial?

    For Woodrow Wilson, President of the United States, the most important goal was the establishment of a League of Nations that would mediate all future conflicts between nations and make war as a means of politics unnecessary.

  1. History Essay - Why did war break out in Europe in 1939

    Great Britain and France were unwilling to risk another war so soon after World War I. The two powers knew they would bear the burden of any fighting. Hitler prepared to strike again soon after Germany acquired Austria in March 1938.

  2. To what extent was the Treaty of Versailles justifiable?

    But the old liberal ideas could not be kept in the twentieth century as the situations changes and liberal ideas could not keep up with the modern world. The treaty of Versailles could be seen as too liberal and this was the ultimate failure as the moral justification lay on

  1. Summary of John Maynard Keynes' "The Economic Consequences of the Peace".

    the population and a collapse of the organization that Europe was based upon, not to mention the obscuration and the hiding of the civilization to desperately satisfy the immense need of the despaired individual. On the 13th of May 1919, Count Brockdorff-Rantzau addressed to the Peace Conference of the Allied and Associated Powers the Report of the German Economic commission.

  2. Why did war break out in Europe in 1939?

    land it lost at the end of First World War and Germany receiving the west of Poland including Danzig and the Polish Corridor. This pact benefited both Hitler and Stalin because it meant that Hitler attack on Poland was inevitable and he was prevented two danger of wars on two

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work