• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Were the peace treaties of 1919 - 1923 fair?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Were the peace treaties of 1919 - 1923 fair? Introduction After World War I various peace treaties were made, the most important and well known being the Treaty of Versailles. At the Treaty of Versailles there was disagreement, France wanted Germany to be punished as severely as possible whereas Britain and the USA realized that punishing Germany too harshly would only cause far worse problems later on. Britain and France both wanted to capitalize on World War I and gain German and Turkish colonies, the USA was against this and considered this kind of behaviour imperialistic however a compromise was reached and the colonies were divided among the winning powers and ran on behalf of the League of Nations. Meanwhile in Eastern Europe various other treaties were being signed - The Treaty of Neuilly, The Treaty of Trianon, The Treaty of Saint-Germain, The Treaty of S�vres and finally the Treaty of Lausanne. Although none of these treaties were as important as Versailles they would all affect peace in Europe in the years following the First World War. ...read more.

Middle

Germany had absolutely no right to Belgium. Argument stating that the peace treaties of 1919 - 1923 were unfair: The Treaty of Versailles was extremely unfair. Germany was used as a scapegoat and made to take almost entire blame for a war, which was only partially Germany's fault. Germany suffered huge losses herself in the war and had suffered hugely; Germany was forced to pay ridiculously high reparations - basically for just losing the war. The reparations Germany was forced to pay were enormously high, the German economy had suffered hugely during the war. The huge reparations would only worsen the German economy and cause extreme poverty throughout Germany. Argument stating that the peace treaties of 1919 - 1923 were fair: The Treaty of Saint-Germain was fair and just, Austria was forbidden from ever seeking unification with Germany and her army was limited to 30,000 men. Austria-Hungry was a danger to future peace in Europe and quite rightly a large chunk of Austria was divided into 3 new states - Czechoslovakia, Poland and Yugoslavia. ...read more.

Conclusion

Turkey was also forced to pay large reparations, which it could not afford. Whilst Turkey had lost much of her empire Britain and France were adding to theirs by taking Syria, Israel, Jordan and Iraq - Turkey will have been annoyed at this too. The Treaty of S�vres gave Turkey a very bad deal. The Treaty of Trianon was unfair on Hungry, two thirds of Hungary's territory was lost - this reduced Hungary's population to just 7 million from 18 million. Conclusion Some of the treaties made after WWI probably were unfair however the Treaty of Versailles was not unfair. Germany lost little territory and any punishment that they did receive was probably deserved. Millions of allied soldiers - British and French as well as American soldiers lost their lives fighting a bloody battle that could have been averted had Germany not gone to war. Some of the other European treaties were unfair but to make treaties that left everyone happy and everyone thinking that they were fair would have been impossible. It was difficult enough for three allies - Britain, USA and France to agree on a treaty. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a strong response that offers a good range of reasons and is balanced by considering both sides of the argument. The sub headings are unnecessary as the author's structure is clear enough and the points are valid but evidence is a little thin in places. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 01/12/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why Did The First World War Break Out in 1914?

    5 star(s)

    help each other if either of them was attacked by the Triple Alliance because France was worried about Germany attacking them whereas Russia was worried about Austria attacking them and then Germany joining in because of their alliance system. * Although France had always been Britain's main competitor, in 1904

  2. Germany was to blame for causing World War One.

    This only caused more tension between countries. The disputes originally started over colonies and who wanted where. They ran out of places to make their colonies so they fought over each others colonies.

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    Given below are some of the conditions of the treaty and statistics on the war In world war one 8.5 million people were killed and 21 million were wounded. Below are the figures for each country, Britain: 750,000 soldiers killed; 1,500,000 wounded France: 1,400,000 soldiers killed; 2,500,000 wounded Belgium: 50,000

  2. The main cause for WW1 was naval Rivalry. To what extent do you agree ...

    alliances: The triple Alliance, which consisted of Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy, formed in 1882 and the Triple Entente consisting of Britain, France and Russia, formed in 1907. The alliance system was started by Bismarck (the German chancellor) from 1871-1890. Bismarck organised a system of alliances designed to maintain Germany's hegemony on the European continent.

  1. To what extent was Hitler to blame for WW2?

    Another reason Hitler wanted to expand Germany's territory into Eastern Europe was to provide "Lebensraum" (living space) for the growing German population. This is an excellent example of self-interest on his part. Hitler's aggressive nationalism (for he was prepared to use force to regain these territories)

  2. Was the Treaty of Versailles unfair to Germany?

    there decide by having a plebiscite, I think this was a good decision. The only problem with taking all the land away was that the Germans became very annoyed about this and it could aggregate them in the future. In the process of land being taken away they lost a

  1. Summary of John Maynard Keynes' "The Economic Consequences of the Peace".

    Therefore, the danger would be the speeding economic depression that might lead to the starvation for a part of the European population; a problem already existing in Russia and approximately Austria. "Men will not always die quietly", Keynes says; starvation will lead to a despair that might cause hysterias amongst

  2. World War 1 - How Two Bullets Caused 20 Million Deaths

    The members of the Black Hand Gang gathered up and were worried because if Nedelko Cabrinovic how was in police custody revealed their identity they would get caught but he didn?t. After their fail attempt Gavrilo Princip was famished so he went to a restaurant on Franz Josef Street to get a sandwich.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work