• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What happened to the Romanov Family

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What Happened to the Romanov Family? A) Sources A and B are both similar and give similar accounts of the story, however does this mean that they are both reliable? Source A tells the accounts of Judge Sergeyev who would be biased as he was a supporter of the provisional government and appointed by them too. At first it seems pretty reliable and trustworthy as Sergeyev apparently had all the evidence in the Romanov case and therefore if he had that sort of information you would expect him to know the truth about the happenings. He believes that not all the people were shot in the house but that the Tsar, the family doctor, two servants and a maid were shot in the house not the others. However, a month after this report had leaked were Sergeyev claims that not all of the Romanov family were killed there, Sergeyev was sacked. This leads to a lot of speculation as to why he was sacked. It could have been that he was sacked as his report wasn't bad enough against the Bolsheviks and he stated that not everyone was killed there which decreases the extent of the damage the Bolsheviks had supposed to have done. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore that account isn't totally reliable. There are many facts that conflict both sources reliability such as Judge Sergeyev having a strong influence on both sources. Also the fact that Sergeyev got sacked a month after the report was issued combined with the fact that in Source C his successor Sokolov's account is far more gruesome and biased towards the provisional government shows that maybe Sergeyev got sacked for telling the truth and that makes his source more reliable however, Sokolov learned from his mistake and made sure his report was as bad as possible and shows how horrendous and evil the Reds were. Overall, both sources had agreed on a number of things like the number of people killed and their identities and the gruesomeness of the deaths. However, when cross referenced with other sources like Source C it shows that Source B is slightly under speculation whereas Source A could be the truth and in fact very reliable. B) The accounts in Source A and B have many differences and similarities with Source C. ...read more.

Conclusion

Sources A and B are much less gruesome in how the Royal family were killed whereas Source C goes over the top with the detail and gore just to show how awful the Bolsheviks were. Source C also says that Sergeyev had no doubt that the entire Romanov family were killed in the Ipatiev house however, in Source A Sergeyev apparently believed that only some members of the Romanov family were killed in that house and therefore that is false. Overall, it is obvious that Source C greatly differs from Source A and B as there are many things that are strongly conflicted in the sources whereas the things they agree on are limited and not that important. Source C shows that the murders were horrendous and it was carnage but there's nothing to support that in the other Sources. Source C also claims the bodies were dumped of but Source B says the family were seen alive elsewhere. All these things linked in prove that the extent of disagreement is great and Source A & B compared with Source C are very different and disagree. ?? ?? ?? ?? Saif Najeeb ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin Sources Questions

    of Russian ideology with Communism but this failed because of Krushchev's gradual De-Stalinisation of Russia. Stalin's good and bad sides are both portrayed in Source L, which makes it very useful to refer to. As Source L says, Stalin achieved great things in his 25 year reign: we now see how, in any country, advancement comes at a cost.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Husbands and wives now jointly owned the family property, where before it had belonged to the husband only. The law was very blunt: "All marriages are to be based on the free consent of men and women." Divorce was made easier to get.

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family

    journalist or reporter could have slightly changed the sequences of event, while Pavel Medvedev was unaware of what was being written exactly. Also the fact that they are notes from an interview with a white Russian shows that it would obviously turned into a biased interview and notes.

  2. Source A is a report from an American newspaper and it tells us that ...

    They also agree in that they both say the people were shot at by revolvers. Sources C and A are both biased towards whites. Sources A and B say that the Tsar and 4 others were shot in the house but the rest of the family were not.

  1. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    that he is greater then everyone else; this is certainly true as after all he had opposition. We read in the source by Bukharin that Stalin got rid of anyone that was better then him-opposition. This anyone that studied Stalin Russia would know is true.

  2. What happened to the Romanovs?

    They had to be finished off by stabbing them to death. The massacre was complete and the entire Romanov family was slaughtered. In an interview with Pavel Medvedev, these described events are supported. He was a Red Guard commander and this is the only eye-witness account from 1919.

  1. What Happened To The Romanovs

    Parts of this book were never made public. Judge Sokolov also supported the White Russians. The beginning of source C says, in Sokolov's words; "My predecessor, Sergeyev, on handing the case to me, had no doubt about the fact that the entire Romanov family had been massacred in the Ipatiev House."

  2. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    Source C has a totally different account to what was meant to have happened. This source is from a book which was written by Judge Sokolov. He has a very different opinion to what Judge Sergeyev and Sir Charles Elliot believe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work