• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10

What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A and B give similar accounts. Does this mean they are reliable?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

GCSE HISTORY COURSEWORK: What happened to the Romanov family? (a) Study Sources A and B. Sources A and B give similar accounts. Does this mean they are reliable? Grippingly, it is true that both Sources A and B give similar accounts as they are both different perspectives of the same information which comes from Judge Sergeyev who was the first investigator appointed of the Romanov family murder case by the Whites. He was a supporter of the Provisional Government which was got rid of by the Bolscheviks. Source A is an opinionated and subjective account from an American Newspaper whereas Source B is a generalised extract from Sir Charles's report to the British government. Both nations - America and Britain were against the Bolscheviks suspected of the murder of the Russian Royal Family so the reliability of both sources can be questioned in the context of its author and purpose, tone and content as well as their origin. Clearly, source A and B agree to some extent as they both imply that the Tsarina and her five children were not shot there in the basement of the Ipatiev house where the Romanovs had been captivated but only the Tsar himself. This is evident as Source A mentions, "all the people, the Tsar, his family and those with him, were not shot there and that "the Tsar's son and the four children were not shot in that house." Meanwhile, Source B explains, "Tsar is supposed to have been shot" with "Dr Botkin, the Empress's maid and two servants". The reason for this agreement between the two sources is that the authors of both these sources have based their findings from gathering information from a main source - the same person - Judge Sergeyev. However, the extent of their reliability can be questioned by two ways. The first method is by cross-referencing them with other sources to see if their details agree with the information conveyed in other accounts. ...read more.

Middle

Furthermore, the Whites were military supporters of the Tsar and were main rivals of the Reds whom they had lost the civil war to. Source D may be distorted as it is from the interview of Pavel Medvedev by White Russians" and the fact that "he was probably tortured by the Whites" hence it can be assumed that it was exaggerated in the disfavour of the Reds with the intention of proving them guilty so the Whites could fulfil their intention of declaring the cruel murder of the whole family by the Reds to get support across Russia. This would have allowed them to degrade the Bolscheviks as many already devastated Russians and foreign governments as that of Germany's would be horrified, petrified and mortified to hear that the Royal family had been murdered by the Reds whom they had trusted and supported - people who promised to give them peace, land and food. With all factors considered, I believe although Source D is the nearest we have to an eye-witness account, it is still very unreliable to a large extent as Medvedev's version of the execution events in the Ipatiev House on 17th July contradict strongly with other sources more than they agree with them. The hidden component of fallibility in this source is further emphasised by Source E when Medvedev's own wife admits to Medvedev's blatant involvement in the execution of the Tsar and his family which he denied when he was interviewed by the White Russians as he may have felt that the Whites will pursue him if they found out he also contributed in murdering the captivated Russian Royal family whom a large number of the Whites were fanatic supporters of. (d) Study Sources F,G and H. Which one of these sources is most useful to an historian studying the deaths of the Tsar and his family? A modern historian would know from his background knowledge on the deaths of the Tsar and his family that in 1991, archaeologists found ...read more.

Conclusion

- the potential rivals of the Reds, he had probably distorted the truth to create an extremely negative impression of the Bolscheviks as callous murderers not worthy of the Russian support they had. Because at the beginning of Source C it is stated, "the entire Romanov family had been massacred", we can assume that the "bodies" it talks about being transported to the Four Brothers mine were of the each of the massacred Romanovs. This is again a contradiction to Source J which conveys us, "Two of the imperial family's five children were missing when archaeologists opened a shallow burial pit near Ekaterinburg in 1991". Moreover, Sources D and E have similar disagreements with Source J as they also indicate that all the members of the Romanovs were shot. Source D by Medvedev includes, "all the members of the Tsar's family lying on the floor" and that "The corpses" presumably the Tsars therefore "were carried out to the lorry." Likewise, Source E whose purpose is mainly to emphasise on how killed the Tsar also backs up Source D by adding, "they killed them all". Alternatively, though I believe the pictorial Sources of F,G and H don't relate to any information in Source J, I still consider them useful as they all depict the manner in which the victims of 17th July were shot in the basement of the Ipatiev house. In conclusion, I believe that Source J is not confirmed by other sources on the topic of what happened to the Tsar and his family to a very large extent although there are several similarities between Source J and other sources. Nevertheless, I still consider this source to be the most reliable because it backs up its report by extremely reliable and accurate scientific methods as that of DNA and Dental records. Therefore, as mentioned before, the element of reliability or the hint of untrustworthiness in other sources are the basis of how much they agree or disagree with Source J. Akshat Krishna 11TS ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    Bukharin was speaking in Paris, which is significant. He was Russian, and worked with Stalin so therefore should have been in Russia but Stalin expelled him from Russia, perhaps because he was paranoid that Bukharin was plotting against him. This could be why Bukharin hated him Stalin so.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    His use of "striking propaganda" at this time would have been received as "Gospel" by the Russian people because they were so afraid of Stalin that they would have believed anything that he would have said. In all truthfullness Source D is a contradiction in itself.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    The Russian workers could take power, but they could not hold onto power indefinitely: everything depended on the world revolution. Even in an advanced capitalist country, it would have been difficult at that time to have immediately introduced workers' control and management of industry and the state.

  2. Why did the Reds win the Russian civil war?

    The aim of War Communism was to keep the Bolshevik armies and the towns supplied with food and weapon, while sharing out the wealth between the Russian people. The government tried to share out the wealth by taking over production and industry, forcing peasants to hand over surplus food, making free enterprise illegal and rationing all food.

  1. Investigate the changes that took place in Horsforth between 1700 and 1900

    Hall Park 6 12 100 Chapel Green 11 11 0 Fink Hill 16 37 131.25 The idea that the increase in population is highest in the Fink Hill area is backed up the fact that high-density housing was found in the area: The reason why we conclude that it is

  2. Stalin man or monster

    Hence one could say that these two sources are honest opinions of Stalin who to an extent disagreed many of Stalin's policies. Thus I conclude that the two sources are trust worthy as Khrushchev's statements do reflect Stalin's personality and actions during that time in history, giving historical authenticity.

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    western ideas Which interpretation is best supported by the evidence in the source and your knowledge of the period? Explain your answer. The purpose and the intensions of why Mao lunched the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution is unclear. The Cultural Revolution was an attempt to bring China forward as a unite country along and with great strength of the country.

  2. What caused the Romanov Dynasty to fall? Explain the fall and decline of the ...

    By 1900, Russia had about 2 500 000 urban workers. They lived in unhygienic, poorly built, and overcrowded factory dormitories, which did not even have running water or sewerage systems. The workers gained poor wages and had no trade unions to fight for them, as this was illegal.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work