• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What Led to the Downfall of the Tsar?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What Led to the Downfall of the Tsar? There are apparently two main trains of thought by historians as to what led to the downfall of the Tsar, Nicholas II. The first suggests that Russia was beginning to improve, and the Tsar was willing to make the changes in government required in the then near future, when the First World War began, and the Tsar was forced to make unpopular decisions, which ultimately led to his downfall. The second, which I will explore, accepts progress was made industrially, however observes that not enough of the population had felt these benefits, which kept the proletariat discontented and prone to striking up to and beyond 1914.This view accepts that the First World War acted as a catalyst to the discontent that was already rooted in the majority of the population of Russia. I believe that Tsar Nicholas II was placed in a difficult position because of the enormous size of his country, lack of a significant bourgeoisie, and the economically ravaged feudal system; however his personality, his refusal to responsibly fulfill his role in ...read more.

Middle

After 1905 when Tsar Nicholas II made concessions which became known the October Manifesto, the middle class were moderately satisfied, and began to back him again. This most likely caused Nicholas II to forget how precarious his position was, particularly since he began to overrule the new parliament known as the Duma, and drastically cut its power so that once again the country was basically run by an autocracy. Any decisions made at the Duma had to be approved by the Tsar. This of course did not please the bourgeoisie, however, one must remember that the middle class does not particularly care for bloody scenes or lawlessness. It would appear that they took a figurative 'step back' in political affairs. The middle class almost always originates from poverty. Thus one could conclude that a small middle class meant a large peasant/working class population. Although I do not believe that peasants are ever solely responsible for the overthrowing of an ancien regime or a revolution, I do believe they played a significant part in the revolutions in Russia. ...read more.

Conclusion

Newspapers and cartoonists of the day also insinuated an extramarital affair between them, heightening the sense of dissatisfaction already rife among the people of Russia. By this stage, any move the Tsar could have would have been the wrong decision, and the loss at the Front with him in charge caused people to hold him personally responsible, be it fair or not. His decision to order his soldiers to fire at protesters in Petrograd was a point of no return, now he was clearly an enemy the people could unite against, and this they did. The downfall of the Tsar was inevitable, I believe, as soon as he made it clear that he was not interested in any form of government other than an autocracy. However, many factors contributed towards the actual onset of the 'overthrow', one of the main ones being the First World War and the way he handled it. Ultimately, downfall was inevitable in any ancien regime that did not move forward in the 'natural progression' (according to Karl Marx) of things, as was seen in France, and later on, Russia. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

    5 star(s)

    "I visited the station there I saw 18,000 wounded men lying on the ground". Later in spring 1915 the Germans invaded and advanced over three hundred miles. This was when Nicholas decided to dismiss his chief minister and take the role on himself this was a mistake as now the Russian people blamed him not the ministers.

  2. "To what extent was World War One the main reason for the downfall of ...

    However, although opposition groups existed before the war they only really developed their true strength in this period. The Menshevik's became influential, as did the Bolsheviks. However, even with the influence of the war the revolutionary groups only really had a big influence in the major cities of Russia, as

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    The weak and embattled workers' state was compelled to defend itself arms in hand, or else surrender to the tender mercies of the White armies, which, in common with all counter-revolutionary armies in world history, used the most bestial and bloodthirsty methods to terrorise the workers and peasants.

  2. Describe how events in Russia1914-17 led to the downfall of the Tsar Nicholas II

    Hoping reform would come from above. In reaction, guards fired into the unarmed crowd; when news of one hundred dead and hundreds more wounded escaped, public opinion almost universally turned against the old regime. People believed it was the Tsar who gave the orders and the "Little Father" image was completely destroyed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work