• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which of these two sources is the more reliable as evidence about Prohibition?

Extracts from this document...


Sean B.C Coursework Question C Which of these two sources is the more reliable as evidence about Prohibition? Source E was written by John D. Rockefeller; he was a wealthy industrialist and believed strongly in Prohibition in the 1920's. Source E gives us some very reliable evidence about Prohibition, it tells us that "drinking has generally increased, many of our best citizens have openly ignored Prohibition" "and crime has increased to a level never seen before". We can also tell that the writer of this letter was for Prohibition, "when prohibition was introduced, I hoped that it would be widely supported by public opinion". The main reason for Rockefeller being supportive of Prohibition was because he was an industrialist; they liked the idea of Prohibition. ...read more.


Source F was written by John F Kramer, he was the Commissioner for Prohibition in 1920 and he enforced Prohibition. Source F talks about how the law of Prohibition will be enforced and what will happen if people do not obey the law. This source was written in 1920, right at the start of Prohibition. As the man saying these things is an officer of the law and his job is to enforce Prohibition then he will obviously say it will work and people should obey it, because if this law did not exist, he would not have a job. There is evidence that Kramer wants to convince people Prohibition will work and that he is trying to show he is a strong leader. ...read more.


I know that John D. Rockefeller had a reason for supporting Prohibition, this being he believed it would help his drunken workers get to their job on time, which meant bigger profits for him. I also know John F. Kramer has a reason for supporting Prohibition, as he is the Commissioner he will support it because it is his job to enforce this law, if there was no Prohibition then he would not have a job. The reason Kramer's evidence is not as reliable as Rockefeller's is because of the time at which he wrote it. He did not know anything about Prohibition, whether it would work or fail, unlike Rockefeller who wrote source E. Rockefeller wrote his letter after Prohibition had ended, so he has more reliable evidence about Prohibition. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. There are many contributing factors to why prohibition was introduced on 16 January 1920. ...

    This lowered public opinion of gangsters and of prohibition. This made many people to start to support getting rid of prohibition, which led to some people joining anti-prohibition groups, and voting against prohibition. This lack public support for keeping prohibition made it a very difficult law to enforce, which made the government realise that the law was impossible to enforce.

  2. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    If this happens, the family will still not have enough money. Then when he returns to work, he is likely to go to the saloon again and spend his wages and the cycle happens again. If it happens enough, the man could lose his job and then the family would be in real difficulty.

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework

    Capone bribed his way to the top and corruption was everywhere in Chicago. Capone 'owned' half of the police force and many judges openly called him 'A1'. Throughout America the law of prohibition was very unpopular and its connections with forms of entertainment such as Jazz made it extremely difficult to abolish.

  2. Prohibition 1920 Sources Question

    Both sources have very different opinions, and show the variety of thoughts during, and after prohibition. There were many opinions at this time, and that is what made it easy for the people to become convinced that prohibition was the right thing for America during that time.

  1. America: Prohibition Sources Question

    The fact that the poster was made in Germany in the 1920's is also helpful, as it gives an "outside view" of what was happening in America, at the time that it was happening. However, the source could possibly have been slightly biased against America, due to feelings left over from World War 1.

  2. Prohibition: Which of these two sources is more reliable as evidence against prohibition?

    public, makes it more reliable because the writer was not trying to convince anyone and it was his own understanding of the situation and it's his account, his experience and his beliefs of what was happening. The Source can also said to be strongly reliable because it agrees with other sources for example source A & B.

  1. Prohibition Sources Questions

    Kevin Costner not caring any longer about Prohibition and going along with the story line. The ending has Elliot Ness going away for a drink. The point that historians can argue if they watched the film is that the film is'nt intended to be made for Prohibition or historian purposes,

  2. Study sources C and D Were the artists of these two posters for ...

    Nobody lies and wants to be called na�ve so this suggests that he is not lying. Also John D. Rockefeller, Jr., wrote the letter after prohibition had ended. This means that what had to happen, happened and that he saw and felt the results of prohibition so he would have a better view of everything.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work