• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Did It Take So Long To Control The Great Fire Of London In 1666

Extracts from this document...


Great Fire Of London Coursework Part 2: Why did it take so long to control the fire? In the early hours of Sunday 2nd Setember 1666 in Thomas Farrinor's Royal bakery on pudding lane, a deadly fire broke out from the remains of the days fire. Few people would have known that the fire would rage for four days until Thursday 6th September. The growth of the fires path of destruction from one street to 350 acres of land was caused, aided and not prevented because of many factors. Weather was in my opinion the most clinical factor in the decline of the wooden structure that was 17th century London. The previous two years had seen significant droughts and so in September 1666, London was a vulnerable place in the event of a fire. However, the reason the fire lasted so long was because of the wind. The spread of the fire from one easily flammable wooden roof to another was made effortless and uncontrollable by the East wind which also added Oxygen to the fire. This deadly wind lasted for the first three days of the fire and as soon as the wind subsided on the fourth day the fire was brought under control. ...read more.


He is often credited for orgnising an effort to stop the fire. The negligent and selfish attitudes of the people towards the fire were another reason it spread so quickly. Most people spent their time desperately salvaging personal possessions and getting them out of danger by boat or cart. Many people profited by renting out carts and boats and paying poorer people to move their goods. Renting a cart would have cost a modern equivalent of �8000. The city gates were so congested that on Monday afternoon they were ordered shut. Many people thought that fighting the fire was pointless as it was too widespread, Others however, simply refused to fight the fire as they believed it was a "punishment from God" and was too powerful and that fighting it was pointless and immoral. The general public weren't the only ones not working to put the fire out, as by Monday the authorities had already launched an investigation into the causes of the fire and were already rounding up foreigners (who they believed to be behind a plot to burn London, due to the ongoing Second Anglo-Dutch War.) Another reason that the fire wasn't stopped sooner was the lack of resources in tackling the fire. ...read more.


Some of the city's most iconic buildings such as St. Paul's Cathedral and the Royal Exchange. Around 13,500 houses were destroyed along with 87 churches, 44 company halls and three city gates. Many people, especially the poor, lost all their possessions and savings. The damages from the fire were estimated to be �10,000,000 (over �1,000,000,000 in 2005 pounds). The immediate death toll is reported to be in single figures, but this is considering that the deaths of working and middle class people were not seen as important and the amount of people who froze or starved to death living homeless on the streets in the following months and years is unknown. I feel that there are many combined factors as to why it took to long to control the Great Fire of London. Thomas Bloodworth's disobeyal of the King and reluctence to sacrifice a few houses cost the city much more than a few house reparation would have. Bloodworth however, wasn't the only person to neglect the issue and not act upon it seriously as this was the general attitude of the public and I think if the fire had been looked at more seriously, it wouldn't have caused such widespread damage. Once the fire had passed a certain stage without being dealt with, it was an impossible task considering the resourses availible and the detering factors such as the wind. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. The Gunpowder Plot

    Some think that even if the plan had succeeded, the gunpowder may not have blown up because how old it was.

  2. Reichstag Fire

    It is known that Hitler was an extremist and he bitterly hated the Communists. Source D describes the actual event of the Reich Stag fire which broke out on 27th February 1933 at 9.45pm. The writer of this extract was the Head of the Prussian police.

  1. Reichstag Fire

    However, Source C doesn't tell us when Goebbels wrote the diary entry or why Goebbels formed such a strong opinion so soon, and why he though it was the "last attempt for the communists to seize power", making this a possible exaggeration of the events, or maybe the information presented

  2. History of London - planning a series of museum exhibits to show London from ...

    After the war ended there was more than 100,000 people homeless, buildings were damaged and destroyed. The population decreased from 8.6 million to 6.7 million. There was an aftermath of the World War II in 1940s: severe winters, food shortages, and wage freezes.

  1. History Coursework - Modern World Study - The Long March

    Mao also speaks of "untold difficulties and great obstacles on the way", but he focuses more on how the Long March itself served as useful propaganda: "The Long March has sown many seeds which will yield crop in the future".

  2. Nazi Control and Hitler's Foreign Policy

    This involved Concentration/Death camps, and the public hanging's of many groups that opposed the Nazi's these were aimed to shock and scare Germans into following Nazi ideas, even if they did not believe them they would support the Nazi's out of fear.

  1. The Royal Pavilion

    He is always shown wearing a high cravat, most probably to disguise the swelling from goitre and it is highly probable that the Prince first came to Brighthelmstone in order to try the sea water cure because of his pain.

  2. A Diary of the Great Fire of London from the point of view of ...

    Margaret, and then spread to Thames Street, with its riverside warehouses and wharves filled with food for the flames: hemp, oil, tallow, hay, timber, coal and spirits along with other combustibles. I always wanted that shop gotten rid of anyway.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work