• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the Tsar abdicate in 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the Tsar abdicate in 1917? In 1917 the Tsar of Russia was forced to abdicate for many reasons. These included the impact of the First World War; this couldn't alter the Tsar's autocratic, non-reforming ideas. The economy; Russia became a bad state and the Tsar got the blame. The army; the Tsar lost support from the army. Opposition; workers went on strike and the Tsar's closest ally, Rasputin, was murdered. Finally the Tsar himself and the upper class; the Tsar refused to share power and Resputin was also in control who wasn't very good. All of these factors lead up to the Tsar's abdication but why couldn't he keep control or find a way to gain support again? Some of these factors didn't just hinder the Tsar they also helped, but obviously not enough to keep the Tsar in power. In 1914 the war expanded certain industries for instance military weapons and armour. Military production increased by 400% due to war and the country benefited from booms and the empire ended up being the fifth largest industrial power. But to hinder the Tsar, he lost money through railroads, which were used in army and war efforts. Foreign trade went down by 80%, which means they didn't have any foreign investment and could lead to even more conflict. ...read more.

Middle

As the generals were in charge of the army and the generals also stopped supporting the Tsar, the generals could easily use one of the only powers the Tsar had against him. In 1914 there was shortage of weapons, which meant that he didn't have all the power he would need in the war. But they had a victory against Austria, which again would be a good thing but it started a war off in the end. They lost a lot of troops against Germany and in 1915 the general turned against the government. They lost an incompetent war leader and left them open to blame and criticism. There were four million casualties, the majority being original officers, which lead to a lack of leadership and had trouble defending against other countries. They did later on though, have success against Austria and the Turks. So the army did support the Tsar for a while. But this all changed in 1917 when on the 26th of February, the military took up positions and opened fire against the workers who were on strike. The Tsar still had his most powerful weapon. But when travelling back home from the front, the tsar's journey was blocked by troops and was forced to make a detour. ...read more.

Conclusion

suppressing discontent were all unavailable to the Tsar in 1917 but were in 1905,the Tsar was defeated in 1915, there were food and fuel shortages in 1916, urban discontent, professional classes, industrial workers and liberals could all be controlled in 1905, a loyal army no longer existed, no one was prepared to save the monarchy and Nicholas became weak after failure to make concessions. In conclusion I believe that the most important factors in the Tsar abdicating was the army as these were one of his most powerful weapons, not only in the war but also in controlling the various groups who were against him, and also the Tsar himself because he wanted autocracy and wouldn't listen to anyone else's views, he wanted to rule by himself in the way he wanted even if it was a mistake. I believe this is why he lost a lot of support from people. Russia was well behind the times in both military and economic terms. The war had no impact on the Tsar's intent to preserves the Tsarist system and ultimately it was Russia and the Russian people who suffered and had the Tsar realised the Russian system of government was in desperate need for reform in order to make Russia a great power once more, then the Tsar may have been saved. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why was the Tsar Forced to Abdicate in 1917?

    Factory workers also faced problems, such as overcrowding, terrible food, disease and alcoholism. Working and living conditions were atrocious, and talk of a revolution soon spread through the overfull dormitories and work spaces. After this, things became progressively worse as people became more and more malcontent with the state of the country.

  2. Why did the Tsar abdicate after the 1917 revolution

    The War played a big part in both revolutions, in 1905 and in 1914. In the 1905 the war was with the Japanese over Manchuria, an area of northern China. People thought that the big heavy weight, Russia, would have little difficulty dealing with Japan.

  1. How and why did the Bolsheviks seize power in 1917?

    Ministers were dismissed and then replaced. On March 11th an order was issued sending Rasputin to Tobolsk, but the Empress ordered it to be cancelled. The concerns were so great that a group of leading aristocrats murdered Rasputin in December 1916.

  2. What happened in February 1917 and why did Nicholas abdicate

    so that the city of St.Petersburg on the 24th February had over 300,000 workers on strike. 26th February: Cossacks sent to disperse the crowds shot on them: by nightfall order seemed to have returned to the city, although they're had been a small mutiny in the Petrograd garrison.

  1. Why does the Tsar abdicate in 1917?

    Whilst it is true, Russian economy was "poised precariously between painstakingly won success and occasional ruin" (Service), and for a long time economic failure was on the cards, it was the war that became a "final judgement", able to sway economic discontent to political protest.

  2. Why Was The Tsar Forced To Abdicate?

    Because there was no elected parliament, zemstovs had to look after matters such as schools and hospitals. Nicholas dismissed any calls for an elected parliament as a "senseless dream." Nicholas' rule was enforced by the secret police call the Okhrana.

  1. Why Did Tsar Nicholas Abdicate Following the 1917 Revolution but not the 1905 Revolution?

    The peasants didn't have many rights either and this annoyed the further. But again they still wanted to keep the Tsar and only wanted things to change. The last type of people and perhaps the most important as there were more of them are the industrial workers in the cities.

  2. How far was military defeat responsible for the fall (abdication) of the Tsar in ...

    Although in the half century following emancipation the peasant lived miserable, unsuccessful lives, there were no serious peasant disturbances until around 1900 when there were widespread riots. The workers had similar problems when the industrialisation of Russia in the late nineteenth century meant that they were working longer hours, in

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work