• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the Tsar abdicate in 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the Tsar abdicate in 1917? In 1917 the Tsar of Russia was forced to abdicate for many reasons. These included the impact of the First World War; this couldn't alter the Tsar's autocratic, non-reforming ideas. The economy; Russia became a bad state and the Tsar got the blame. The army; the Tsar lost support from the army. Opposition; workers went on strike and the Tsar's closest ally, Rasputin, was murdered. Finally the Tsar himself and the upper class; the Tsar refused to share power and Resputin was also in control who wasn't very good. All of these factors lead up to the Tsar's abdication but why couldn't he keep control or find a way to gain support again? Some of these factors didn't just hinder the Tsar they also helped, but obviously not enough to keep the Tsar in power. In 1914 the war expanded certain industries for instance military weapons and armour. Military production increased by 400% due to war and the country benefited from booms and the empire ended up being the fifth largest industrial power. But to hinder the Tsar, he lost money through railroads, which were used in army and war efforts. Foreign trade went down by 80%, which means they didn't have any foreign investment and could lead to even more conflict. ...read more.

Middle

As the generals were in charge of the army and the generals also stopped supporting the Tsar, the generals could easily use one of the only powers the Tsar had against him. In 1914 there was shortage of weapons, which meant that he didn't have all the power he would need in the war. But they had a victory against Austria, which again would be a good thing but it started a war off in the end. They lost a lot of troops against Germany and in 1915 the general turned against the government. They lost an incompetent war leader and left them open to blame and criticism. There were four million casualties, the majority being original officers, which lead to a lack of leadership and had trouble defending against other countries. They did later on though, have success against Austria and the Turks. So the army did support the Tsar for a while. But this all changed in 1917 when on the 26th of February, the military took up positions and opened fire against the workers who were on strike. The Tsar still had his most powerful weapon. But when travelling back home from the front, the tsar's journey was blocked by troops and was forced to make a detour. ...read more.

Conclusion

suppressing discontent were all unavailable to the Tsar in 1917 but were in 1905,the Tsar was defeated in 1915, there were food and fuel shortages in 1916, urban discontent, professional classes, industrial workers and liberals could all be controlled in 1905, a loyal army no longer existed, no one was prepared to save the monarchy and Nicholas became weak after failure to make concessions. In conclusion I believe that the most important factors in the Tsar abdicating was the army as these were one of his most powerful weapons, not only in the war but also in controlling the various groups who were against him, and also the Tsar himself because he wanted autocracy and wouldn't listen to anyone else's views, he wanted to rule by himself in the way he wanted even if it was a mistake. I believe this is why he lost a lot of support from people. Russia was well behind the times in both military and economic terms. The war had no impact on the Tsar's intent to preserves the Tsarist system and ultimately it was Russia and the Russian people who suffered and had the Tsar realised the Russian system of government was in desperate need for reform in order to make Russia a great power once more, then the Tsar may have been saved. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why did the Tsar Abdicate after the 1917 Revolution but not after the 1905 ...

    After the loss against Japan he was shaken up so he relaxed control of the country. This allowed various working groups to join together in protest which later became known as Bloody Sunday. (More on Bld.Sun. later) WWI was a whole different matter in terms of its involvement with the population.

  2. Why did the Tsar abdicate after the 1917 revolution

    But the war revealed the weaknesses of the Tsar's regime. As the fighting was in the far east of Russia it took the Tsar some to time to get his troops there which immediately gave Japan the upper hand. The Russian Baltic Fleet was ordered to sail half way round the world to take part in the fighting.

  1. Why was the Tsar Forced to Abdicate in 1917?

    Most of society lived in squalid conditions, either as workers or peasants. There was no education in Russia, and not many peasants could read or write although they were loyal to the Tsar. This was partically because most peasants were religious, and went to church.

  2. What happened in February 1917 and why did Nicholas abdicate

    This event inflamed workers however, who saw the shooting into the crowds as an echo of Bloody Sunday, which was the catalyst for the last 'revolution'. 4) Lynch says that the revolution was between the 18th February to 4th March (according to the Julian calendar used in Russia at the time)

  1. How and why did the Bolsheviks seize power in 1917?

    The Tsar however continued to rule paying no attention whatsoever to what the Duma had to say. In 1906, Nicholas appointed Peter Stolypin as the new, talented, prime minister.

  2. The collapse of the autocracy in February 1917 signified the end product of the ...

    Faced with this shortfall Russia had to turn to her allies for assistance in providing essential wartime products. France and Britain however had their own problems and so could only offer limited assistance, and American orders ran behind schedule3. The severing of trade routes, moreover, made it tricky to get

  1. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    This source is useful because we know what is being showed in the source was actually happening in 1917, and it shows a crowd of men numerous enough to fill the photo, which would suggest that they were part of a larger crowd.

  2. Why does the Tsar abdicate in 1917?

    Whilst it is true, Russian economy was "poised precariously between painstakingly won success and occasional ruin" (Service), and for a long time economic failure was on the cards, it was the war that became a "final judgement", able to sway economic discontent to political protest.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work