• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of March 1917?" In the 1905 revolution, the Russian Population was not seeking to overthrow

Extracts from this document...


Nicolas Baumann History Essay January 2006 "Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of March 1917?" In the 1905 revolution, the Russian Population was not seeking to overthrow the Tsarist autocracy, but was rather demanding social and economic reforms, a representative government and elections. However in the February 1917 revolution, the workers and the soldiers massed together with only one idea in their heads; overthrow Tsar Nicholas II and put an end to Russia's autocratic system. The February revolution of 1917 had successfully overthrown Tsar Nicholas II, Nicholas II abdicated on the 2nd of March 1917. The Tsar was not overthrown in the 1905 revolution because nobody imperatively wanted him to be overthrown, they rather wanted him to change the way he ruled the country, this made him instore the Duma and create the October Manifesto which addressed the unrest in Russia and promised to grant civil liberties such as Freedom of Speech. The various land, social and economic reforms instituted by Tsar Nicholas II from 1905 to his end in 1917 created a stage for the 1917 revolution. Those reforms meant that Russia was modernizing and industrializing at a fast rate, this meant that peasants were moving to the cities, and due to this urbanization, the low-class population was brought closer together and was able to create a class-awareness which created the stage for the February 1917 revolution. ...read more.


The Tsar decided to give in. Count Sergei Witte encouraged the Tsar to create the October Manifesto; the manifesto was issued on the 30th of October 1905. The October manifesto basically pledged to grant civil liberties and promised the Duma where people could be elected and represent their groups and interests, much like a parliament. The Tsar also promised to put an end to press censorship and gave people the right to form political parties. This was the start of the Downfall of the Tsar, now that he created the Duma, it gave his opponents a chance to meet and share their views about the Tsar and communicate between each other much better, one of the reasons why he wasn't overthrown in 1905 was due to the fact that his different opponents were not organized and could not cooperate properly, for example, in1905 the railway workers did not go on strike which meant that troops could be brought in to control the situation. With the Duma, although the Tsar did not grant it much power, his opponents now had a place to meet and exchange views and opinions. Also the end of press censorship meant that newspapers could now release anything they wanted, when this was added to formation of political parties and to the fact that people were now able to say what they wanted to say, resulted in the Tsar and his autocracy being greatly harmed by the manifesto and opposition grew stronger and more organized. ...read more.


crowds below."4 On the 2nd of March 1917, Tsar Nicholas II "abdicated for himself and his sick son in favour of his brothers Michael; but Michael, realizing the extent of the antimonarchical feeling, refused and the Romanov dynasty came to a swift end. The Duma committee set about forming a new Government." This was the definite end of the Russian Autocracy and of the Tsar. In the 1905 revolution, the urban population was still "young", there was no class-awareness and there were no organized groups and committees. The 1905 revolution could be seen as a rehearsal for the February 1917 revolution. After being pressured in 1905, the Tsar was making mistakes upon mistakes, one of which was his decision to lead the army in World War One and to put his wife, Alexandra, in charge of the autocracy, this tarnished the image of the Tsar and created an even bigger feel that the government was incompetent. Russia, however, had made some progress in modernization and in agriculture and industrialization; but these 3 factors did not rhyme with autocracy, at least not with the Tsar's autocracy. It brought low-class people closer together from the countryside and created this "class-awareness". The Tsar did not want to make sacrifices for a large gain so he could safely stay in power; instead he continued to impose his crude autocratic regime on the people of Russia which resulted in the end of him and of the Romanov dynasty. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    Still, there were demonstrations and violence throughout 1902 and 1903. The most pathetic fact of all the facts was that there was going to be no change about the peasants and workers. One main reason for that was that the Tsar simply did not know about the real life in Russia.

  2. The Russian Revolution 1917

    It is actually arguable that if the Tsar had listened to Rasputin, the Russian Empire would have had many glorious victories and the Tsar would have been hailed as a great military commander, possibly delaying or even completely preventing the revolution from taking place.

  1. Many causes could lead to a revolution. In 1917, there were two distinct Revolutions ...

    her circle, in which the peasant monk Grigory Yefimovich Rasputin was the dominant influence. When the Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, protested against the inefficient conduct of the war and the arbitrary policies of the imperial government, the czar Nicholas II and his ministers simply brushed it aside.


    In addition they received extremely poor wages The peasants had to pay very high taxes on grain and also on items such as alcohol and salt. The peasant farmers not working in the factories suffered two very poor harvests and it came to a point when they could barely survive.

  1. Use source A and your knowledge of the period to explain why some people ...

    at the time because it was written years later and the writer has gathered up more information so this meant that he has a good idea of what happened. Study sources F and G Q5. Why do you think that these two sources give such different accounts of how women's lives changed?

  2. What were the causes of the 1905 Revolution in Russia?

    This was a key short-term factor in explaining the 1905 Revolution. To sum up, the revolution in Russia in January 1905 was essentially due to long-term factors that had been deep rooted for some time before the uprising actually took place.

  1. Examine the importance of Russian weaknesses in WW1 in explaining the start of Revolution ...

    He believed in 'suppression first, and then, and only then reform', he wanted to work out how to feed the growing population of Russia. Peasants were very conservative and the form of farming they did was called strip farming which was were they farm for their needs no one else's,

  2. Russia's involvement in WW1 was the main reason for the March 1917 revolution - ...

    There were some peasants who worked for the wealthy receiving a small wage. The other peasants had to struggle with their small amount of land and were again refused land from the rich. The affluent did not care for the lower classes and dwelled in their wealth and power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work