• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9

Why has it been difficult to obtain peace in Northern Ireland?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why has it been difficult to obtain peace in Northern Ireland? There is a large variety of social, political and religious reasons why it has been hard to obtain peace in Northern Ireland; there have also been many events that occurred in Northern Ireland that seriously hindered peace progress talks. These are four events that seriously effect peace in Northern Ireland right up to the current day, the Civil Rights Movement, Bloody Sunday, Hunger Strikes and Peace Movements. All these events will be described in my piece of work, I will identify why they happened and who was involved. I will also explain how a power sharing agreement took so long to be put into place because of the impact these events had on the prejudice between Catholic Nationalists and Protestant Unionists. The Civil Rights Movement was a series of Nationalist Catholic marches held between 1967 and 1972 in Northern Ireland, these marches were organised to protest against the discrimination Catholics faced at that time. This discrimination came in many forms for example Catholics found it harder to get houses and some families were on the waiting list for years while single Protestants were placed in homes before them. They also found it hard to get their children good education, or even get themselves a job because many employers would only take on Protestants. It even effected voting as not every Catholic was aloud to take part in the election campaign. So the Nationalist Catholics organised many marches demanding equal rights and to stop prejudice against them. Though these marches were organised with peaceful intent they often turned into mass riots and conflict between Catholic and Protestant civilians. ...read more.

Middle

A while before the hunger strikes were put into place members of the IRA in the jail went on a thing known as the 'Dirty Protest' this is were prisoners would cover the walls of there cell with their own excrement, though it caused extra work for the prison workers and made the jail generally filthy it did not have a large effect on the outside world. It did not bring much attention to the prisoner's situation and it was clear a larger demonstration would have to come to place to have a big enough impact to affect the outside world, the prisoners felt hunger strikes were the best way to achieve their goal. The leader of the very first hunger strikes was called Brendan Hughes, but he was not seen as a good leader at the time and made a vital mistake by calling the strike of when he thought the British Government would give in to their demands but they did not. So weeks after the first attempt at a hunger strike Bobby Sands took over as the leader and developed a plan were a new person would go on strike every week, this was so there would be roughly a death a week if the British Government did not give up to their demands, a death a week would have the ultimate shock factor on the public. Even when the hunger strikes began and Bobby Sands, who opted to be the first strikers, was about to die Margaret Thatcher refused to intervene, she did not want to admit to the situation in Northern Ireland as being a war and that meant not allowing the prisoners on strike to ...read more.

Conclusion

Throughout the first three years of the agreement, Unionists said the Government and major Nationalist parties were failing to live back up the rule for decommissioning of arms, as many paramilitaries such as the IRA were simply not handing over their guns. Moreover, Sinn Fein said the British Government did not demilitarise quickly enough, they stated they could not force anyone to give up arms and that the agreement only stated that the parties should use all their power to make paramilitary's give up their guns, they had discovered a bit of a loophole and arguments quickly started. Eventually after much debating a power sharing agreement has been signed recently in 2007 that the Republic and Northern Ireland are both happy to consent to, it took so long to come to a power sharing agreement that all parties are happy with because of all the complications along the way, a lot of these from the 'battles' Unionists and Nationalist have fort with one another down the years, this caused a lot of hate and prejudice between Catholics and Protestants which lead to events such as Bloody Sunday and the hunger strikes that represented what the Irish people stood for at the time and there pure passion for what they believed in. All these events left such an aftermath that people would not consent to any peace agreements or power sharing until the situation had cooled down, we can only hope that the 2007 agreement brings peace to a troubled Northern Ireland and the civilians that live there. But will the peace last, and will all the political parties and paramilitaries be able to keep peace and settle down, we can only wait and see what the future holds for Northern Ireland. By Callum Newbury ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Ireland coursework-Part AIreland has had a lot of trouble over the years for many ...

    Gerry Adams does not want to become Yasser Arafat." This shows that the US is highly unfavourable of Sinn Fein and is threatening they might have to do something about them soon, they are saying that Sinn Fein have terrorist links with the IRA. Whilst in America Martin Maguinness of Sinn Fein warned the family to back off and

  2. “Why has it proved so difficult to reach agreement about what happened on Bloody ...

    Source C, along with source B, can seem to prove that A, the army statement, is wrong. Source B seems to imply that the marchers were too busy running to be concerned with returning fire, whilst Source C, somewhat boldly, says "I saw no one shooting at troops."

  1. Northern Ireland - The Good Friday Agreement was created in April 1998, and then ...

    The more moderate Ulster Unionists were prepared to consider the document. Party leader James Molyneaux, who had been consulted in the talks, insisted the declaration was merely a statement of principles and it posed no threat to the union because any change required the support of the majority of people in Northern Ireland.

  2. Conflict in Northern Ireland

    Around fifteen thousand people took part in a civil rights march to protest against the detention policy in the city. The Unionist knew abut this march and so British troops were stationed across the city and barriers were put up with the intention of minimizing the amount of violence.

  1. Conflict in Ireland

    The events of Bloody Sunday are still to this day undecided. The British Army have always said that they were fired upon first and say "When we're fired at, we must protect ourselves". This opposes the Marchers opinions that claimed that they were shot at first and only returned fire in response.

  2. The History of Conflict in Ireland.

    strategy based on fashionable Marxist tendencies at the time in the rest of the world. The Catholic community was too impatient, too uninterested in these tendencies. It wanted protection, the traditionalists, that is the Provisional movement, took control automatically. The Provisionals, and the title itself is interesting, because the title

  1. How realistic is a United Ireland in the context of past and present events? ...

    The main principles of the agreement are: 1) Change in the status of Northern Ireland can only come about with the consent of a majority of its people, and if that situation changes, there is a binding obligation on both governments to comply with the wishes expressed by the people of the North.

  2. To what extent does the "Good Friday Agreement" represent a turning point for the ...

    In July, violence erupted in Drumcree as Catholic residents objected to an Orange Order march through their neighbourhood. The loyalist ceasefire, however, held and in June the elections to the Northern Ireland Forum took place without violent incidents in Northern Ireland.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work